TICE strain Bacillus of Calmette-Guerin 12.5mg powder for reconstitution for instillation vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Vaccine primarily used against tuberculosis
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for TICE strain Bacillus of Calmette-Guerin on the MHRA register
OncoTICE 12.5mg powder for reconstitution for instillation vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
1.8 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 28 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 5 · Randomised trials: 1 · 1974–2025
Showing all 28 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Del Giudice F, Asero V, Bologna E, et al.
2023
BACKGROUND: In an era of Bacillus of Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortages, the comparative efficacy from different adjuvant intravesical BCG strains in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has not been clearly elucidated. We aim to compare, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the cumulative BC recurrence rates and the best efficacy profile of worldwide available BCG strains over the last forty years. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1982 up to 2022. A meta-analysis of pooled BC recurrence rates was stratified for studies with ≤3-y vs. >3-y recurrence-free survival (RFS) endpoints and the strain of BCG. Sensitivity analysis, sub-group analysis, and meta-regression were implemented to investigate the contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. A random-effect network meta-analysis was performed to compare BCG strains on a multi-treatment level. RESULTS: In total, n = 62 series with n = 15,412 patients in n = 100 study arms and n = 10 different BCG strains were reviewed. BCG Tokyo 172 exhibited the lowest pooled BC recurrence rate among studies with ≤3-y RFS (0.22 (95%CI 0.16-0.28). No clinically relevant difference was noted among strains at >3-y RFS outcomes. Sub-group and meta-regression analyses highlighted the influence of NMIBC risk-group classification and previous intravesical treated categories. Out of the n = 11 studies with n = 7 BCG strains included in the network, BCG RIVM, Tice, and Tokyo 172 presented with the best-predicted probability for efficacy, yet no single strain was significantly superior to another in preventing BC recurrence risk. CONCLUSION: We did not identify a BCG stain providing a clinically significant lower BC recurrence rate. While these findings might discourage investment in future head-to-head randomized comparison, we were, however, able to highlight some potential enhanced benefits from the genetically different BCG RIVM, Tice, and Tokyo 172. This evidence would support the use of such strains for future BCG trials in NMIBCs.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Oh C, Bourlotos G, O'Callaghan M, et al.
2025
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- BCG Vaccine
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
ABSTRACT Background Most patients with localized bladder cancer are initially managed with endoscopic resection. For high‐grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guerin (BCG) therapy is the gold standard adjuvant treatment. However, 30%–40% of patients fail BCG treatment with lack of response or disease relapse. An understudied area of treatment failure is BCG intolerance, where patients drop out of treatment due to adverse effects. Objectives To examine the incidence and underlying reasons for BCG intolerance among adult patients with NMIBC. Methods We conducted a search on Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies from January 1, 1974 to January 10, 2023, retrieving 3340 articles. Two authors independently conducted screening and data extraction with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria include English‐language studies reporting dropout rates and reasons for discontinuation of BCG therapy in NMIBC patients. Results BCG dropout rates reported among the 28 included studies varied widely from 0% to 52% (estimated summary proportion 12.8%, 95% CI 9%–17%). There was significant heterogeneity in study design. Subgroup analyses show a dose‐dependent effect on dropout rates (3.3% vs. 20%, X 2 = 83.6, p = < 2.2 × 10 −16 ). Dropout rates vary with BCG strains: the Connaught strain had the highest at 21.1%, while the Pasteur strain had 2%. Clinical outcomes for BCG intolerance are not widely reported. Conclusions Dropout rates due to BCG intolerance average 12.8%. As cessation of treatment could lead to an increased risk in progression or recurrence of disease, strategies to mitigate BCG intolerance would be valuable.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
R. Svatek, C. Tangen, S. Delacroix, et al.
European urology focus, 2018
- BCG Vaccine
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
- Progression-Free Survival
M. Horwitz, G. Harth, B. Dillon, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000
- BCG Vaccine
- Disease Models, Animal
- Guinea Pigs
Tuberculosis (TB) continues to ravage humanity, causing 2 million deaths per year. A vaccine against TB more potent than the current live vaccine, bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), is desperately needed. Using two commercially available strains of BCG as host strains, BCG Connaught and Tice, we have constructed two recombinant BCG vaccines stably expressing and secreting the 30-kDa major secretory protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb.), the primary causative agent of TB. We have tested the efficacy of the two strains in the highly susceptible guinea pig model of pulmonary TB, a model noteworthy for its close resemblance to human TB. Animals immunized with the recombinant BCG vaccines and challenged by aerosol with a highly virulent strain of M. tb. had 0.5 logs fewer M. tb. bacilli in their lungs and 1 log fewer bacilli in their spleens on average than animals immunized with their parental conventional BCG vaccine counterparts. Statistically, these differences were highly significant. Paralleling these results, at necropsy, animals immunized with the recombinant BCG vaccines had fewer and smaller lesions in the lung, spleen, and liver and significantly less lung pathology than animals immunized with the parental BCG vaccines. The recombinant vaccines are the first vaccines against TB more potent than the current commercially available BCG vaccines, which were developed nearly a century ago.
Abstract licence: CC BY
S. Brosman
The Journal of urology, 1982
- BCG Vaccine
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
- Carcinoma in Situ
C. Rentsch, Frédéric D. Birkhäuser, Claire Biot, et al.
European urology, 2014
- Administration, Intravesical
- BCG Vaccine
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
S. Brosman
The Journal of urology, 1985
- BCG Vaccine
- Carcinoma in Situ
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Llano A, Chan A, Kuk C, et al.
2024
Introduction: Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy is the standard of care for high-risk and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) as well as for Carcinoma in situ (CIS). Evidence supports that the different BCG strains, despite genetic variability, are equally effective clinically for preventing the recurrence and progression of papillary NMIBC. The available evidence regarding possible differences in clinical efficacy between various BCG strains in CIS is lacking. Methods: We reviewed the literature on the efficacy of different BCG strains in patients with CIS (whether primary, secondary, concomitant, or unifocal/multifocal), including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), phase II/prospective trials, and retrospective studies with complete response rates (CRR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), or progression-free survival (PFS) as endpoints. Results: In most studies, being RCTs, phase II prospective trials, or retrospective studies, genetic differences between BCG strains did not translate into meaningful differences in clinical efficacy against CIS, regardless of the CIS subset (primary, secondary, or concurrent) or CIS focality (unifocal or multifocal). CRR, RFS, and PFS were not statistically different between various BCG strains. None of these trials were designed as head-to-head comparisons between BCG strains focusing specifically on CIS. Limitations include the small sample size of many studies and most comparisons between strains being indirect rather than head-to-head. Conclusions: This review suggests that the clinical efficacy of the various BCG strains appears similar, irrespective of CIS characteristics. However, based on the weak level of evidence available and underpowered studies, randomized studies in this space should be encouraged as no definitive conclusion can be drawn at this stage.
Abstract licence: CC BY
K. Peters, A. Diokno, B. Steinert, et al.
The Journal of urology, 1997
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- BCG Vaccine
- Quality of Life
W. Vogler, Y. Chan
Lancet, 1974
- BCG Vaccine
- Cyclophosphamide
- Cytarabine
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Molecular structure

Linked open data from Wikidata (Q798309), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. Molecular structure images from Wikimedia Commons.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.