Tenofovir alafenamide 25mg tablets

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend maternal tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy accompanied by infant immunoprophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) in highly viremic mothers. However, pooled analyses for tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) effects and comparisons between the 2 regimens are lacking. DESIGN: In this meta-analysis, pairs of independent reviewers performed multiple database searches from inception to 31 March 2024 and extracted data from cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in highly viremic mothers. The outcomes of interest were the reduction of MTCT and safety in the TDF-treated, TAF-treated, and control groups. RESULTS: We included 31 studies with 2588 highly viremic mothers receiving TDF, 280 receiving TAF, and 1600 receiving no treatment. Compared to the control, TDF therapy reduced the MTCT rate in infants aged 6-12 months (risk ratio: 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] .07-.16). Pairwise meta-analysis between TAF and TDF revealed similar effects on reducing MTCT (risk ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval .16-7.61). Network meta-analysis showed equal efficacy of the 2 regimens in reducing MTCT (risk ratio: 1.09, 95% CI .15-7.65). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve revealed TDF as the best regimen compared with TAF (probability ranking: .77 vs .72), while receiving a placebo during pregnancy had the lowest efficacy (probability ranking 0.01). There were no safety concerns for mothers and infants in all regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo or no treatment, maternal TDF and TAF prophylaxis are equally effective and without safety concerns in reducing MTCT in highly viremic mothers.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: Doravirine/islatravir is an investigational regimen that is being studied for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) treatment. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04233879), previously untreated adults with HIV-1 were randomized (1:1) and stratified by HIV-1 RNA (≤/>100 000 copies/mL) and CD4 count (</≥200 cells/µL) to doravirine/islatravir (100/0.75 mg) or bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (50/200/25 mg) orally once-daily (primary endpoint: percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot, 10% noninferiority margin). RESULTS: Overall, 597 participants were treated; enrollment stopped early due to decreases in CD4 and lymphocyte counts observed in other islatravir studies. Doravirine/islatravir was noninferior to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: 265 of 298 (88.9%) versus 264 of 299 (88.3%) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference, 0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.7, 5.6). Mean change from baseline in CD4 count was +182 and +234 cells/µL (difference, -50; 95% CI: -79, -21) with doravirine/islatravir versus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide. Mean change in lymphocyte count was 0.01 and 0.21 × 109/L (difference, -0.20; 95% CI: -0.30, -0.10). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 90.6% and 87.3% of participants, with coronavirus disease 2019 being most common (14.1%, 16.4%). Treatment-related AEs were similar (28.9%, 25.8%). AEs that led to discontinuations were higher with doravirine/islatravir (8.7%, 3.7%) due to protocol-specified criteria that required discontinuation for decreased CD4 and lymphocyte counts. CONCLUSIONS: Doravirine/islatravir (100/0.75 mg) once-daily was noninferior to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide through week 48 for initial HIV-1 treatment. Due to decreases in CD4 and lymphocyte counts, development of this dose of doravirine/islatravir was stopped. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04233879.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Background: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has good viral suppression efficacy and less adverse effect than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).Real-world studies on the antiviral efficacy and safety of switching from TDF to TAF in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are limited.Methods: This retrospective study included 167 nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive patients with CHB.All the patients received TDF at least 12 months before switching and TAF at least 12 months after switching at a single medical center.The Friedman test with Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc tests and repeatedmeasures analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of complete viral suppression, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level normalization, renal function changes, body weight, and body mass index in the periods before and after switching. Results:The mean age and TDF treatment duration were 52 ± 11 years and 2.8 years (interquartile range, 1.51-5.15years), respectively.The complete viral suppression rate was similar between the time of switching and 48 weeks after switching to TAF (77.8% vs 76%, P = 1.000).The percentage of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization increased from 26.3% at TDF start to 81.4% (P < 0.001) at time of switching and 89.2% at 48 weeks after switching to TAF (P = 0.428).The median estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from 100.09 mL/min/1.73m² at TDF start to 91.97 mL/min/1.73m² (P < 0.001) at the time of switching and stabilized at 48 weeks after switching to TAF ((93.47 mL/min/1.73m²,P = 1.000).The body weight decreased from 69.2 ± 12.2 kg at TDF start to 67.4 ± 12.1 kg (P < 0.001) at the time of switching to TAF and returned to 68.7 ± 12.7 kg (P < 0.001) 48 weeks thereafter.The body mass index (BMI) decreased from 25 ± 3.3 kg/m² at TDF start to 24.5 ± 3.3 kg/m² (P = 0.002) at the time of switching to TAF and returned to 25.1 ± 3.6 kg/m² (P < 0.001) 48 weeks thereafter. Conclusions:Our study showed that switching to TAF from TDF had good antiviral effectiveness and stabilized renal function.The body weight and BMI decreased during TDF therapy and regained after switching to TAF.

Abstract licence: CC BY