Sodium stibogluconate 10g/100ml solution for injection vials
Sodium stibogluconate is a medicine used to treat leishmaniasis and is only available for administration by injection.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Sodium stibogluconate
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
850 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · Randomised trials: 16 · 1980–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
A. Musa, E. Khalil, A. Hailu, et al.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2012
- Leishmaniasis, Visceral
- Antimony Sodium Gluconate
- Paromomycin
J. Seaman, D. Pryce, H. Sondorp, et al.
The Journal of infectious diseases, 1993
B. Herwaldt, J. Berman
The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 1992
M. Wasunna, S. Njenga, M. Balasegaram, et al.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2016
- Leishmania donovani
- Leishmaniasis, Visceral
- Phosphorylcholine
N. Aronson, G. Wortmann, W. Byrne, et al.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2010
C.P. Thakur, T.P. Kanyok, A.K. Pandey, et al.
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000
Doni SN, Mohammed FS, Mohammed AB, et al.
2026
- Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous
- Antiprotozoal Agents
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
BackgroundCutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a major public health concern, particularly in Ethiopia, where about 40 000 new cases occur annually, predominantly caused by Leishmania aethiopica. Clinical phenotypes include localized CL (LCL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) and diffuse CL (DCL). Despite the high disease burden, treatment options and high-quality data on treatment outcomes are limited.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of standard treatments in Ethiopia to inform future clinical trials.MethodsWe conducted an observational cohort study of patients with parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis at two specialized dermatology referral hospitals. Clinical- and patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline and at standardized times during follow-up. The primary clinical outcome measure ('cure') was complete re-epithelialization or flattening of the index lesion at day 90. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using skin-specific and general quality-of-life scores.ResultsWe enrolled 666 participants from April 2022 to October 2023. Median patient age was 20 years (interquartile range 14-35) and 405 patients were male (60.8%). More than half (n = 372; 55.9%) had previously received traditional treatment for CL. Most participants had LCL (n = 390; 58.6%) or MCL (n = 261; 39.1%). Intramuscular sodium stibogluconate 20 mg kg-1 daily was the most frequently used systemic therapy, either alone or in combination with lesion-directed therapy (cryotherapy or intralesional sodium stibogluconate). At day 90, 28.3% (n = 83/293) of participants with LCL, 23.5% (v = 47/200) with MCL and 8% (n = 1/12) with DCL were deemed cured. By day 90, all patient-reported outcomes of skin health improved for those with LCL or MCL, but skin and CL-related quality-of-life scores did not improve for those with DCL. Most participants (n = 522/641; 81.4%) experienced at least one clinical adverse event and 7.2% (n = 46/641) had abnormal laboratory findings during treatment.ConclusionsCurrent treatment strategies have low cure rates in Ethiopia. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to improve management of CL caused by L. aethiopica.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Tian Q, Liu X, Peng Z, et al.
2026
BackgroundTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol sodium combined with 0.1% fluorometholone for postoperative dry eye in pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 82 pterygium patients (82 eyes) with preoperative tear deficiency who underwent pterygium excision combined with limbal stem cell transplantation. Patients were divided into an observation group (diquafosol + fluorometholone, n = 42) and a control group (sodium hyaluronate + fluorometholone, n = 40). Tear break-up time (BUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Schirmer I test (SIt), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed preoperatively and at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. Adverse events and complications were recorded.ResultsEighty patients completed follow-up (41 in observation group, 39 in control group). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the observation group showed significantly longer BUT, lower CFS and OSDI scores, and higher SIt values compared to the control group (all p ConclusionIn this pilot study, the combination of 3% diquafosol sodium and 0.1% fluorometholone showed preliminary evidence of improving tear film stability, repairing ocular surface damage, and alleviating dry eye symptoms in pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency, without significantly affecting IOP. Its efficacy appeared superior to sodium hyaluronate combined with fluorometholone. These findings support further investigation in larger, longer-term randomized controlled trials.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Wu Y, Ma X, Li M, et al.
2026
BackgroundTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of okra eyelid patch versus sodium hyaluronate combined with ofloxacin eye drop in the treatment of patients suffering from meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).Methods40 patients included were randomly divided into 2 groups: okra eyelid patch group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20). Before treatment, on the 14th and 28th day of treatment, the following ophthalmic examinations were performed: symptoms and signs score, Schirmer I test (SIT), tear film break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), optical quality analysis system (OQAS II) and ocular surface interferometer examination. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire score and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) were performed before treatment and on the 28th day of treatment. Adverse effects were reported during the treatment period. Results were analyzed by SPSS 25.0 software. p ResultsOn day 28, okra eyelid patch group had a better curative effect in symptoms score, signs score, total score, OSDI questionnaire score, TBUT, and CFS score, lipid layer thickness and MASD compared with control group (p 0.05).ConclusionsOkra eyelid patch has a more significant effect on MGD, especially in improving symptoms and signs, increasing lipid layer thickness, improving tear film stability, maintaining corneal epithelial integrity, and improving the quality of meibomian gland acini compared with artificial tears combining ofloxacin eye drops. It has few side effects, and provides a new therapeutic option for MGD associated with dry eye.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
van Liefland M, van Tilborg PJ, Szmukala M, et al.
2026
- Cluster Headache
- Sodium Oxybate
- Multicenter Studies as Topic
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Sodium stibogluconate directly inhibits DNA topoisomerase I leading to inhibitio…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
The free DNA strand then rotates around the intact phosphodiester bond on the opposing strand, thus removing DNA supercoils. Finally, in the religation step, the DNA 5'-OH attacks the covalent intermediate to expel the active-site tyrosine and restore the DNA phosphodiester backbone (By similarity). Regulates the alternative splicing of tissue factor (F3) pre-mRNA in endothelial cells.
Involved in the circadian transcription of the core circadian clock component BMAL1 by altering the chromatin structure around the ROR response elements (ROREs) on the BMAL1 promoter
ATC P01CB02
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Sodium stibogluconate
Additional database identifiers
ChemSpider
27471272
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:11986
GenAtlas
TOP1
GeneCards
TOP1
GenBank Gene Database
J03250
GenBank Protein Database
339806
UniProt Accession
TOP1_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72