Piperaquine phosphate 320mg / Artenimol 40mg tablets

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of daily co-trimoxazole, an antifolate used for malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women living with HIV, is threatened by cross-resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the antifolate sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. We assessed whether addition of monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to daily co-trimoxazole is more effective at preventing malaria infection than monthly placebo plus daily co-trimoxazole in pregnant women living with HIV. METHODS: We did an individually randomised, two-arm, placebo-controlled trial in areas with high-grade sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in Kenya and Malawi. Pregnant women living with HIV on dolutegravir-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) who had singleton pregnancies between 16 weeks' and 28 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation, stratified by site and HIV status (known positive vs newly diagnosed), to daily co-trimoxazole plus monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (three tablets of 40 mg dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine given daily for 3 days) or daily co-trimoxazole plus monthly placebo. Daily co-trimoxazole consisted of one tablet of 160 mg sulfamethoxazole and 800 mg trimethoprim. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Plasmodium infection detected in the peripheral (maternal) or placental (maternal) blood or tissue by PCR, microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, or placental histology (active infection) from 2 weeks after the first dose of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or placebo to delivery. Log-binomial regression was used for binary outcomes, and Poisson regression for count outcomes. The primary analysis was by modified intention to treat, consisting of all randomised eligible participants with primary endpoint data. The safety analysis included all women who received at least one dose of study drug. All investigators, laboratory staff, data analysts, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04158713. FINDINGS: From Nov 11, 2019, to Aug 3, 2021, 904 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=448) or co-trimoxazole plus placebo (n=456), of whom 895 (99%) contributed to the primary analysis (co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, n=443; co-trimoxazole plus placebo, n=452). The cumulative risk of any malaria infection during pregnancy or delivery was lower in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group than in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group (31 [7%] of 443 women vs 70 [15%] of 452 women, risk ratio 0·45, 95% CI 0·30-0·67; p=0·0001). The incidence of any malaria infection during pregnancy or delivery was 25·4 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group versus 77·3 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group (incidence rate ratio 0·32, 95% CI 0·22-0·47, p<0·0001). The number needed to treat to avert one malaria infection per pregnancy was 7 (95% CI 5-10). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between groups in mothers (17·7 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group [23 events] vs 17·8 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole group [25 events]) and infants (45·4 per 100 person-years [23 events] vs 40·2 per 100 person-years [21 events]). Nausea within the first 4 days after the start of treatment was reported by 29 (7%) of 446 women in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group versus 12 (3%) of 445 women in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Addition of monthly intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to the standard of care with daily unsupervised co-trimoxazole in areas of high antifolate resistance substantially improves malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women living with HIV on dolutegravir-based cART and should be considered for policy. FUNDING: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2; UK Joint Global Health Trials Scheme (UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health Research; Wellcome); and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: Arthropod vectors feeding on the blood of individuals treated with ivermectin have substantially increased mortality. Whether this effect will translate into a useful tool for reducing malaria burden at scale is not clear. Our trial aimed to assess whether using ivermectin as an adjunct to mass drug administration (MDA) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine would further reduce malaria prevalence. METHODS: MATAMAL was a quadruple-blinded, cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled trial, conducted on the Bijagos Archipelago, Guinea-Bissau, an area of seasonal malaria transmission. All residents were invited to participate, with exclusions for drug safety. 24 clusters were randomised in a 1:1 ratio, using restriction randomisation, to either MDA with three daily oral doses of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and ivermectin (300 μg/kg per day) in three sequential months during the transmission season in 2021 and 2022, or MDA with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and placebo in the same schedule. The primary outcome was quantitative PCR prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia in all age groups, during peak transmission, after the second year of intervention. The primary entomological outcome was anopheline parity rate. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04844905). FINDINGS: Participants were recruited between June 7, 2021 and Sept 21, 2022. The baseline population was 25 882 (12 634 [50·6%] were female individuals and 12 317 [49·4%] were male individuals): 13 832 were in the intervention group and 12 050 in the control group. Cluster-level coverage for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine ranged from 60·4% to 78·7%, and for ivermectin or ivermectin-placebo from 58·1 to 77·1%. Following the intervention, the prevalence of P falciparum infection was 118 (5·05%) of 2300 in the control group and 141 (6·64%) of 2083 in the intervention group. The adjusted risk difference was 1·67% (95% CI -1·44 to 4·78; p=0·28). There were 124 adverse events in the control group (1·0% of participants) and 267 in the intervention group (1·9% of participants). Two serious adverse events were reported, neither related to the intervention, and no treatment-related deaths. The anopheline parity rate was 1679 (67·8%) of 2475 in control clusters and 1740 (72·3%) of 2414 in intervention clusters. The adjusted risk difference was -1·32 (95% CI -14·77 to 12·12; p=0·84). INTERPRETATION: Adding ivermectin to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine MDA had no additional effect on reducing malaria prevalence or vector parity in this setting. The intervention was well tolerated. To our knowledge, this trial is the first to be designed to assess whether ivermectin has an additive effect on malaria when coadministered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine MDA. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council, Wellcome, and Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: To mitigate adverse consequences of malaria in pregnancy, the World Health Organization recommends intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. However, the effectiveness of IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has been threatened by widespread Plasmodium falciparum resistance, especially in East and Southern Africa. For IPTp, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine has shown superior antimalarial effects compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, but sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has been associated with improved birth outcomes compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. We hypothesized that a combination of both dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine would provide superior birth outcomes compared to either drug alone. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 2,757 pregnant women in Uganda, where resistance of malaria parasites to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is widespread. Women were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to monthly IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The primary outcome was the risk of a composite adverse birth outcome defined as any of the following: spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, low birthweight (LBW, < 2,500 g), preterm delivery (<37 weeks), small-for-gestational age, or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included specific individual adverse birth outcomes, measures of malaria during pregnancy, and safety/tolerability. Combining dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine did not reduce the risk of a composite adverse birth outcome compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (30.0% versus 30.9%, relative risk (RR) 0.97 [95% CI 0.84-1.12]; p = 0.70) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (30.0% versus 26.4%, RR 1.14 [95% CI 0.98-1.33]; p = 0.10). The risk of a composite adverse birth outcome was higher with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (30.9% versus 26.4%, RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01-1.36]; p = 0.04). Considering individual adverse birth outcomes, combining dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with a higher risk of small-for-gestational age (23.4% versus 18.7%, RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.04-1.51]; p = 0.02) and low birthweight (8.6% versus 5.8%, RR 1.48 [95 CI 1.04-2.12]; p = 0.03) compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and a higher risk of preterm delivery (5.3% versus 3.1%, RR 1.73 [95% CI 1.07-2.79]; p = 0.03) compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. During pregnancy, compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was associated with a 94% reduction in the incidence of symptomatic malaria (0.46 versus 0.03 episodes per person-year, incidence rate ratio 0.06 [95% CI 0.03-0.12]; p < 0.001) and a 97% reduction in the risk of microscopic parasitemia (17.7% versus 0.6%, RR 0.03 [95% CI 0.02-0.05]; p < 0.001), but dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was not associated with improved malaria outcomes over dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone. There were no significant differences in the incidence of any grade 3-4 adverse events between the treatment arms. As this study was conducted in an area of high transmission intensity with widespread resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, findings may not be generalizable to other settings. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the superior antimalarial activity of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone was associated with improved birth outcomes. Combining dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for IPTp did not improve birth outcomes compared to either sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04336189; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04336189).

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: High-level resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine threatens the efficacy of WHO-recommended intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with single-dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to prevent malaria. Monthly IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, a 3-day regimen, is an emerging alternative, but this regimen poses potential implementation and adherence challenges. We aimed to assess adherence to a multiday IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine regimen and its delivery effectiveness in routine antenatal care settings in western Kenya. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, three-armed, open-label, cluster-randomised trial in antenatal clinics in 18 health-care facilities (six facilities per group) in Kisumu County and Homa Bay County in western Kenya. Clusters were facilities offering routine antenatal care services provided by trained Ministry of Health staff with 100 or more antenatal clinic attendances per month between July, 2018, and June, 2019. Private or mission hospitals, dispensaries, referral hospitals, and trial sites were excluded. Individuals in their first trimester, living with HIV, or who were not attending a scheduled antenatal clinic visit were excluded. The 18 antenatal clinics were grouped into matched triplets stratified by location and clinics in each matched triplet were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups (1:1:1). Masking was not possible. Two groups were given IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (one group with a targeted information transfer intervention and one group without any additional interventions) and one group was given the standard of care (ie, IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine). The primary endpoint, adherence, was defined as the proportion of participants completing their most recent 3-day IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine regimen. This completion was verified by pill counts during home visits no more than 2 days after participants' 3-day regimens ended. The secondary endpoint, delivery effectiveness, was defined as the proportion of participants who received the correct number of IPTp tablets and correctly repeated dosing instructions (ie, correctly recalled the instructions they received about self-administered dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine doses and the number of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine tablets they had received) at their exit from the antenatal clinic. Individuals receiving treatment for malaria, visiting a clinic for registration only, or interviewed during IPTp drug stock-outs were excluded from analyses. We used generalised linear mixed models to compare endpoints among the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine groups. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04160026, and is complete. FINDINGS: 15 facilities (five per group) completed the trial, with 1189 participants having exit interviews (377 in the IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group, 408 in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine only group, and 404 in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus targeted information transfer intervention group) and 586 participants having home visits (267 in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine only group and 319 in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus targeted information transfer intervention group) from Sept 8 to Dec 10, 2020. Relative to the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine only group, adherence was 16% higher in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus targeted information transfer intervention group (266 [83%] of 319 participants vs 196 [73%] of 267 participants; adjusted relative risk [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 1·03-1·31; p=0·0140). Delivery effectiveness in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus targeted information transfer intervention group was not significantly different from that in the IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (352 [87%] of 403 participants vs 335 [89%] of 375 participants; adjusted RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·90-1·05; p=0·4810). However, delivery effectiveness in the IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine only group was significantly lower than in the IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group (300 [74%] of 404 participants vs 335 [89%] of 375 participants; 0·84, 0·75-0·95; p=0·0030). INTERPRETATION: Targeted information transfer interventions to health-care providers and pregnant individuals boost antenatal care delivery adherence to a multiday regimen with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. FUNDING: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2, UK Joint Global Health Trials Scheme of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health and Care Research, and Wellcome Trust; and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) is being recommended in Africa for the management of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and for chemoprevention strategies, based on the ability of piperaquine to delay re-infections. Although therapeutic resistance to piperaquine has been linked to increased copy number in plasmepsin-coding parasite genes (pfpm), their effect on the duration of the post-treatment prophylactic period remains unclear. Here, we retrospectively analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial, where patients received either DHA-PPQ or artesunate-amodiaquine for recurrent malaria episodes over two years. We observed an increase in the relative risk of re-infection among patients receiving DHA-PPQ compared to artesunate-amodiaquine after the first malaria season. This was driven by shorter average times to reinfection and coincided with an increased frequency of infections comprising pfpm3 multi-copy parasites. The decline in post-treatment protection of DHA-PPQ upon repeated use in a high transmission setting raises concerns for its wider use for chemopreventive strategies in Africa.

Abstract licence: CC BY