Piperaquine phosphate 320mg / Artenimol 40mg tablets
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 9 · Randomised trials: 37 · 2004–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
R. W. van der Pluijm, M. Imwong, Chau Hoang Nguyen, et al.
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 2019
Muthoka EN, Usmael K, Embaye SM, et al.
2023
- Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic
- Malaria
- Antimalarials
M. Roh, Julie R. Gutman, Maxwell Murphy, et al.
eClinicalMedicine, 2025
K. Marwa, A. Kapesa, V. Baraka, et al.
PLoS ONE, 2022
Bohissou FET, Nassa GJW, Sondo P, et al.
2025
- Malaria
- Malaria, Falciparum
- Artemisinins
BackgroundArtemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) has contributed to the reduction of malaria burden in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the number of global cases has risen since 2015. Resistances to artemisinin reported from Southeast Asia and recently emerged in sub-Saharan Africa might threaten ACT efficacy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on ACT efficacy trends in sub-Saharan Africa from January 2010 to December 2024.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed/Medline and Scopus for studies published between 2010 and 2024 that met the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria for therapeutic efficacy studies. Two reviewers have independently assessed the eligibility criteria and extracted data. ACT efficacy was measured using the PCR-corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) at day 28 or 42. Meta-analysis was conducted using R.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 116 studies with a total of 17,341 participants for artemether-lumefantrine (AL), 8,855 for artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ), 5,544 for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ), and 346 for artesunate-pyronaridine (AS-PY). Over the period under review, from 2010 to 2024, the PCR-corrected ACPR for AS-AQ, DHA-PPQ, and AS-PY remained above 90% across sub-Saharan Africa. For AL, the PCR-corrected ACPR remained high between 2010 and 2014, consistently exceeding 90% (range: 91-100%). However, from 2015 to 2024, the efficacy showed greater variability, with PCR-corrected ACPR values ranging from 74% to 100%. Notably, this efficacy dropped below the 90% threshold in several countries, including Kenya (2017), Burkina Faso (2018), Uganda (2019), and Nigeria (2020).ConclusionsWhile AS-AQ, DHA-PPQ, and AS-PY have maintained high efficacy over time in sub-Saharan Africa, there is a concern about the declining efficacy of AL in some West and East African countries. Our findings suggest that AS-PY could be a promising candidate for inclusion in first-line malaria treatments to address the declining efficacy of AL. Continuous monitoring of ACT efficacy, innovative and efficient control strategies are crucial to prevent the spread of antimalarial drug resistance.RegistrationPROSPERO number CRD42023432718.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Madanitsa M, Barsosio HC, Minja DTR, et al.
2023
- Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic
- Quinolines
- Antimalarials
I. Sagara, A. Beavogui, I. Zongo, et al.
Lancet (London, England), 2018
Simanjuntak AMT, Wijayanto FPS, Nugraha RTH, et al.
2026
- Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic
- Malaria
- Sulfadoxine
F. Rahmasari, M. Imwong, Irfanul Chakim, et al.
Bali Medical Journal, 2023
R. Kajubi, Teddy Ochieng, A. Kakuru, et al.
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2019
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.