Raltegravir 100mg chewable tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Raltegravir is an antiretroviral drug produced by Merck & Co., used to treat HIV infection.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Raltegravir
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Raltegravir
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Raltegravir
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Raltegravir on the MHRA register
Isentress 100mg chewable tablets
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
800 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 10 · Randomised trials: 17 · 2008–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
F. Raffi, H. Jaeger, E. Quiros-Roldan, et al.
The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2013
J. Lennox, E. Dejesus, A. Lazzarin, et al.
Lancet, 2009
F. Raffi, A. Babiker, L. Richert, et al.
Lancet, 2014
Zhang Y, Wu W, Yang M, et al.
2025
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
- HIV Infections
- HIV Integrase Inhibitors
Pebolo PF, Bongomin F, Morgan B, et al.
2026
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
- HIV Infections
- HIV Integrase Inhibitors
IntroductionHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed infants face elevated risks of neonatal sepsis, influenced by maternal antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens. Dolutegravir (DTG), a widely used integrase transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and the preferred first line drugs for management of HIV in pregnancy, has shown potential adverse effects such as hyperglycaemia, which may impact neonatal outcomes including risk of neonatal sepsis. We estimated the pooled incidence of neonatal sepsis among neonates exposed to INSTIs in utero compared to non-INSTIs-based ART regimens.Methods and analysisA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following written as per the PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Global Health and Global Index Medicus were searched for studies published between January 2013 and September 2025. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies comparing INSTI-based ART regimens with non-INSTI regimens among pregnant women living with HIV. Data were extracted using Covidence software, Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assessed for quality of randomised clinical trials and observational studies, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading, Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.ResultsA total of 714 studies were identified and screened based on their titles and abstracts, of which 63 articles underwent full-text review. Ultimately, four studies, comprising 7,636 participants, met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for neonatal sepsis among infants exposed to INSTIs was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-1.30, p = 0.137). The test for subgroup difference was not significant (p = 0.358): the pooled OR for dolutegravir was 0.27 (95% CI 0.06-1.23, p = 0.090) and for the single raltegravir study was 0.73 (95% CI 0.16-3.30, p = 0.681).ConclusionINSTI-based ART was not associated with a significant difference in neonatal sepsis risk compared with non-INSTI regimens. However, the low number of events limited the precision of the estimates, highlighting the need for further research.RegistrationThis review has been registered with the PROSPERO at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251178411 , registration number CRD420251178411.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
R. Quercia, Jeremy N Roberts, Louise Martin-Carpenter, et al.
Clinical Drug Investigation, 2015
Koethe JR, Lake JE, Kantor A, et al.
2026
- HIV Infections
- Obesity
- Triazoles
BackgroundIntegrase inhibitors (INSTI) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) have been associated with greater weight gain compared to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), but the effects of an antiretroviral regimen switch on weight are unclear.MethodsThis 48-week, 3-parallel group, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT04636437) in people with HIV and obesity on an INSTI (bictegravir, dolutegravir, or raltegravir) with TAF/emtricitabine (FTC) assessed whether switching to the NNRTI doravirine (DOR) with TAF/FTC or TDF/FTC results in weight loss or stabilization. Treatment effects were estimated using linear regression adjusted for sex, race, and entry weight.ResultsOf the 147 participants randomized, 145 initiated their assigned treatment. At entry, median age was 49 years; body mass index was 34.9 kg/m2, and time on INSTI + TAF/FTC was 3.4 years; 49% were female and 53% Black. After 48 weeks, the estimated mean change in weight was -0.47% (95% CI: -2.09, 1.14) for the DOR + TAF/FTC arm, -2.73% (-4.22, -1.23) for DOR + TDF/FTC, and -1.84% (-3.37, -0.30) for INSTI + TAF/FTC. The estimated mean difference in weight change at 48 weeks for DOR versus INSTI (both with TAF/FTC) was 1.36 percentage points (97.5% CI: -1.20, 3.92) and -0.89 percentage points (-3.34, 1.57) for DOR + TDF/FTC versus INSTI + TAF/FTC. There was no evidence of variation by sex or race, nor of treatment differences for changes in fasting lipids, insulin resistance, fat mass, or bone mineral density.ConclusionsIn people with HIV and obesity, switching from an INSTI + TAF/FTC regimen to DOR/FTC with either TAF or TDF did not produce clinically meaningful differences in weight change or metabolic health after 48 weeks.
Abstract licence: CC BY
J. Hakim, Jennifer A Thompson, C. Kityo, et al.
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 2018
E. Joao, R. L. Morrison, David E. Shapiro, et al.
The lancet. HIV, 2020
J. Bernardino, A. Mocroft, P. Mallon, et al.
The lancet. HIV, 2015
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
90 found
Half-life
9 hours
Mechanism
Raltegravir inhibits HIV integrase to prevent the viral genome being incorporated into the human genome.
Food interactions
1 warning
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Half-life
9 hours
Protein binding
83%
Volume of distribution
83%
Metabolism
Elimination
Clearance
9%
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 240 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
ATC J05AR16
ATC J05AJ01
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Raltegravir
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
20173
ChemSpider
16445111
BindingDB
25351
PDB
RLT
ZINC
ZINC000013831130
UniProt Accession
Q7ZJM1_HV1
GenBank Gene Database
M15654
GenBank Protein Database
326388
UniProt Accession
POL_HV1B1
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:12530
GeneCards
UGT1A1
GenBank Gene Database
M57899
GenBank Protein Database
184473
Guide to Pharmacology
2990
UniProt Accession
UD11_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72