Cabotegravir 600mg/3ml prolonged-release suspension for injection vials

BACKGROUND: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis has been introduced in more than 70 countries, including many in sub-Saharan Africa, but women experience considerable barriers to daily pill-taking, such as stigma, judgement, and the fear of violence. Safe and effective long-acting agents for HIV prevention are needed for women. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of injectable cabotegravir compared with daily oral tenofovir diphosphate plus emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) for HIV prevention in HIV-uninfected women. METHODS: HPTN 084 was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, superiority trial in 20 clinical research sites in seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Participants were eligible for enrolment if they were assigned female sex at birth, were aged 18-45 years, reported at least two episodes of vaginal intercourse in the previous 30 days, were at risk of HIV infection based on an HIV risk score, and agreed to use a long-acting reversible contraceptive method. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either active cabotegravir with TDF-FTC placebo (cabotegravir group) or active TDF-FTC with cabotegravir placebo (TDF-FTC group). Study staff and participants were masked to study group allocation, with the exception of the site pharmacist who was responsible for study product preparation. Participants were prescribed 5 weeks of daily oral product followed by intramuscular injections every 8 weeks after an initial 4-week interval load, alongside daily oral pills. Participants who discontinued injections were offered open-label daily TDF-FTC for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints of the study were incident HIV infection in the intention-to-treat population, and clinical and laboratory events that were grade 2 or higher in all women who had received at least one dose of study product. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03164564. FINDINGS: From Nov 27, 2017, to Nov 4, 2020, we enrolled 3224 participants (1614 in the cabotegravir group and 1610 in the TDF-FTC group). Median age was 25 years (IQR 22-30); 1755 (54·7%) of 3209 had two or more partners in the preceding month. 40 incident infections were observed over 3898 person-years (HIV incidence 1·0% [95% CI 0·73-1·40]); four in the cabotegravir group (HIV incidence 0·2 cases per 100 person-years [0·06-0·52]) and 36 in the TDF-FTC group (1·85 cases per 100 person-years [1·3-2·57]; hazard ratio 0·12 [0·05-0·31]; p<0·0001; risk difference -1·6% [-1·0% to -2·3%]. In a random subset of 405 TDF-FTC participants, 812 (42·1%) of 1929 plasma samples had tenofovir concentrations consistent with daily use. Injection coverage was 93% of the total number of person-years. Adverse event rates were similar across both groups, apart from injection site reactions, which were more frequent in the cabotegravir group than in the TDF-FTC group (577 [38·0%] of 1519 vs 162 [10·7%] of 1516]) but did not result in injection discontinuation. Confirmed pregnancy incidence was 1·3 per 100 person-years (0·9-1·7); no congenital birth anomalies were reported. INTERPRETATION: Although both products for HIV prevention were generally safe, well tolerated, and effective, cabotegravir was superior to TDF-FTC in preventing HIV infection in women. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, ViiV Healthcare, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Additional support was provided through the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences provided pharmaceutical support.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: In 2023, there were 39.9 million people living with HIV (PLWH) worldwide and 630 000 deaths related to HIV. New strategies are needed, and long-acting antiretrovirals (LAAs) are now widely considered to have great potential to help end the HIV epidemic. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the safety and efficacy of LAA versus standard oral treatment (SOT) for HIV. METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature, were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting efficacy and/or safety of LAA versus SOT for PLWH until June 2024 were included. Efficacy (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) and HIV RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL, adverse events (AEs), treatment discontinuation, CD4 count, metabolic parameters and drug resistance were assessed. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion, involving 2829 participants. LAA was non-inferior to SOT in suppressing HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL [Risk Difference (RD), -0.00; 95% CI, -0.03-0.02; P = 0.83; I2 = 51%; high quality of evidence (QoE)]. LAA was associated with higher drug resistance (percentage pooled estimate, 57%; 95% CI, 33%-78% versus 9%; 95% CI, 2%-30%; moderate QoE) and risk of grade 1-4 AEs than SOT [Risk Ratio (RR), 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; P < 0.001; I2 = 62%; moderate QoE]. CONCLUSIONS: LAA has non-inferior efficacy compared to SOT. However, participants receiving LAA were at a higher risk of developing drug resistance, cross-resistance and AEs.

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: Randomized controlled trial evidence suggests that long-acting injectable (LA-I) cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) has similar virological failure (VF) rates to daily oral therapy, but clinical practice evidence is lacking. Integrase inhibitor (INI) resistance may limit future therapy. The optimal regimen is uncertain. METHODS: We synthesized evidence from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and conference abstract databases through 18 November 2024, to identify observational cohort studies (OCS) that reported on VF events in virally suppressed individuals who switched to LA-I CAB+RPV. We extracted data on VF, resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at VF, post-VF regimen choice and re-suppression. We assessed the risk of bias using a modified Downs and Black tool. RESULTS: VF definitions differed considerably among OCS, with 172 individuals experiencing VF across 79 cohorts that included 13 899 individuals. Twenty-eight cohorts (n = 7987) reported genotypic information at VF. Out of the 80 VF events with genotypic information available at the time of the VF event, NNRTI mutations were identified in 45 cases, INIs in 40 cases, and dual-class resistance in 33 cases. Notably, 28 VF events were not accompanied by resistance. Post-VF regimen choices were reported for 92 VF events. Regimens used were protease inhibitor (PI)-based, oral INI-based and some physicians continued LA-I CAB+RPV post-VF. Re-suppression occurred in 87.8% (65/74) of VF events in which it was described. CONCLUSIONS: In OCS, VF was a very uncommon occurrence and comparable with clinical trials. However, when it did occur, it was frequently accompanied by resistance. Post-VF regimens used to achieve suppression varied, including LA-I CAB+RPV maintenance and were highly successful.

Abstract licence: CC BY

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated rates of treatment-emergent resistance-associated mutations (TE-RAMs) and discontinuation due to adverse events (DC-AEs) across integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based single-tablet regimens and injectable cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB + RPV) in virologically suppressed people with HIV. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted for phase 2-4 randomized controlled trials with ≥48 weeks of follow-up involving virologically suppressed people with HIV aged ≥12 years and published January 2003-March 2024. A random-effects network meta-analysis estimated comparative rates of TE-RAMs and DC-AEs among regimens at 48 weeks. Risk of bias and strength of evidence were assessed using Cochrane RoB and CINeMA, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen (7509 participants) and nine (4656 participants) studies were included in the TE-RAMs and DC-AEs analyses, respectively. No significant differences in rates of TE-RAMs were observed; risk ratios (RRs) for TE-RAMs for bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) and CAB + RPV every 4 weeks (Q4W) versus CAB + RPV every 8 weeks (Q8W) were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.02-2.04), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.00-19.85) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.14-1.09). Compared with CAB + RPV Q4W and Q8W, DC-AEs were significantly lower with B/F/TAF (RR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.03-0.75] and RR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.67], respectively) and DTG/ABC/3TC (RR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.48] and RR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.46], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In virologically suppressed people with HIV, switching to CAB + RPV Q8W yielded a non-significant increased risk of TE-RAMs compared with INSTI-based 2- and 3-drug regimens and CAB + RPV Q4W. Both CAB + RPV Q4W and Q8W had significantly higher risks of DC-AEs than B/F/TAF and DTG/ABC/3TC. Findings highlight the importance of considering both resistance and tolerability when switching regimens.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BACKGROUND: HIV infections are ongoing globally despite efficacious biomedical prevention options. We sought to determine whether an HIV prevention package providing choice of daily pills or long-acting injectable cabotegravir and opportunities to change prevention options could increase biomedical prevention coverage and reduce new HIV infections. METHODS: This study was an extension of three randomised trials that used SEARCH dynamic choice HIV prevention to recruit adults (aged ≥15 years) at risk for HIV from antenatal, outpatient, and community settings in rural Uganda and Kenya. In this 48-week open-label extension, participants maintained their original (1:1) randomisation group; the option to choose cabotegravir long-acting injectable was added for intervention participants. Inclusion criteria for the extension were previous enrolment in a SEARCH dynamic choice HIV prevention trial, negative HIV rapid test, and residence in study region. The intervention provided person-centred choice of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or post-exposure HIV prophylaxis (PEP) or cabotegravir long-acting injectable, with the option to switch according to participant preference. The control provided standard-of-care access to oral PrEP and PEP, but not cabotegravir long-acting injectable. Biomedical prevention coverage (proportion of follow-up covered by oral PrEP, PEP, or cabotegravir long-acting injectable; primary outcome) and HIV incidence (secondary outcome) were compared between groups using targeted minimum loss-based estimation. The trial (NCT05549726) is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Of 1534 participants initially randomly assigned (from April 15, 2021 to Sept 29, 2022), 984 (487 in the intervention group and 497 in the standard-of-care group) reconsented to the extension (from Jan 2 to March 3, 2023). The mean proportion of follow-up covered by biomedical HIV prevention was 69·7% (95% CI 64·9-74·5) in the intervention group versus 13·3% (10·2-16·3) in the standard-of-care group, corresponding to an absolute difference of 56·4 percentage points (95% CI 50·8-62·1; p<0·0001). The intervention significantly improved coverage across prespecified subgroups (sex and age groups). During the study, 274 (56%) of 485 intervention participants used cabotegravir long-acting injectable, 255 (53%) used oral PrEP, and ten (2%) used PEP. Among cabotegravir long-acting injectable initiators, 118 (43%) of 274 were not previously using oral PrEP or PEP. There were seven incident HIV infections in 390 person-years of follow-up in the standard-of-care group and no infections in 400 person-years of follow-up in the intervention group (incidence rate difference per 100 person-years 1·8, 95% CI 0·4-3·2; p=0·014). INTERPRETATION: Offering people the choice of HIV biomedical prevention options including cabotegravir long-acting injectable in a flexible model can increase prevention coverage and reduce incident HIV infections. HIV programmes should support dynamic choice HIV prevention programmes that include effective oral and injectable long-acting products. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.

Abstract licence: CC BY

The use of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (LA CAB/RPV) is a novel approach to manage human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This injectable regimen offers benefits such as an improved quality of life, reduced stigma and enhanced treatment satisfaction by minimising the need for daily medication adherence. This review summarises the findings of clinical trials and real-world studies on the safety, tolerability and metabolic effects of LA CAB/RPV, which are areas that have received less extensive coverage in previous reviews. Clinical trial data suggest that LA CAB/RPV is generally safe and well tolerated. The most common side effects were injection site reactions, affecting 70-97% of participants. However, these were typically mild and short lived, rarely leading to treatment discontinuation in fewer than 2-3% of cases. Systemic side effects were minimal and comparable to those observed with traditional oral antiretroviral therapy. Real-world studies corroborated these findings, reporting low discontinuation rates due to adverse events. Regarding metabolic impact, clinical trials showed minimal weight gain (an average increase of 1-2 kg over 48-96 weeks) with no significant differences or impact on lipid and glucose levels. Although real-world data are still emerging, they suggest similar trends, including a possible improvement in lipid profiles. Overall, LA CAB/RPV appears to be a safe, well-tolerated and effective treatment option, although longer-term follow-up is needed.

Abstract licence: CC BY