Nystatin 100,000units/g / Chlorhexidine hydrochloride 1% cream

IntroductionA higher prevalence of oral problems has been observed in the elderly population. One of the treatment options for some of these pathologies is the administration of mouthwashes combined with mechanical removal techniques. Besides, each type of oral rinse treats certain oral diseases, and it should be selected for each specific situation.ObjectiveTo determine the use and efficacy of mouthwashes in the elderly as a treatment for various pathologies, to indicate the most common kinds of mouth-rinses used, the diseases treated with them, their efficacy in each treatment, and their effectiveness when they are combined with other treatments.Material and methodsThe review has been carried out following the PRISMA 2020 Statement. Individualized bibliographic searches were performed in five databases. Randomized clinical trials are included in patients over 60 years old where mouthwashes were administered to treat or prevent specific diseases. The PICO question aimed to assess what type of mouthwashes elderly patients use, what they use them for, and their efficacy. Study selection, data extraction, and quality analysis were achieved using the RoB-2 guide.ResultsThirteen articles were chosen to perform the qualitative analysis. The bibliometric analysis was carried out. We have eleven randomized controlled clinical trials and two uncontrolled. The mouthwash more used was chlorhexidine, followed by essential oils and fluorides. The most studied pathologies were a periodontal disease, caries, candidiasis, denture stomatitis, and xerostomia. Chlorhexidine used weekly is effective as antiplaque and antigingivitis. Fluorides effectively prevent and reverse caries; nystatin and essential oils to treat candidiasis; and pilocarpine rinse to manage xerostomia.ConclusionsThe included studies show that mouthwashes are widely extended in the elderly population, and each sort is specifically designed for treating a particular condition.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Candida auris possesses distinctive features that facilitate its persistence and transmission in healthcare settings, causing outbreaks of infection that are difficult to treat. So, emphasis has been placed on implementing measures for controlling, eliminating, and preventing fungal transmission, such as environmental disinfection and patient decolonization. This review aimed to understand and analyze the agents for environmental disinfection and patient decolonization reported in the last 5 years. The PubMed database was reviewed, using the terms "Candida auris", "disinfection", and "decolonization". Only original papers, published between 2020-2025, in English or Spanish, that included relevant information on the topic, were selected. After the selection process, 52 articles were chosen to analyze the agents for environmental disinfection and decolonization of C. auris. Natural and synthetic disinfectants and ultraviolet radiation were reported for the environmental disinfection, with variable efficacy, depending on factors such as concentration and exposure time. Natural and synthetic antiseptics were also reported for decolonization, with varying efficacy. For example, 2% chlorhexidine shows a 0.5 log reduction, while at concentrations >10% it is >4 log. However, most have only been tested in animal models. Based on the review, Far-UV-C radiation (222 nm) is safe and appropriate to mitigate (up to 1 log reduction) the spread of C. auris in the hospital setting. However, it is important to consider that the cost and limited availability of the device present a barrier to its implementation. Patient decolonization is still challenging nowadays due to the absence of agents with proven high efficacy in humans.

Abstract licence: CC BY