Molgramostim 150microgram powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Molgramostim has been used in trials studying the treatment of Bronchiectasis, Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, and Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Molgramostim
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Molgramostim on the MHRA register
Leucomax 150microgram powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
350 microgram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · Randomised trials: 9 · Trials: 3 · 1994–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
B. C. Trapnell, Y. Inoue, F. Bonella, et al.
ILD/DPLD of known origin, 2024
Susanne Herold, Tobias Welte, Kai Zacharowski, et al.
ERJ Open Research, 2026
Background Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) enhances pulmonary host defence and promotes re-establishment of alveolar barrier function. We investigated the safety, feasibility and efficacy of nebulised recombinant human (rh)GM-CSF (molgramostim) in pneumonia-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated phase 2a trial, patients were randomised to receive nebulised low-dose (150 μg) or high-dose (450 μg) rhGM-CSF or placebo for 3 days. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed before the first dose and after dosing. The primary outcome parameter was the composite GI-HOPE score, representing expression changes of CD80, CD86, CD206 and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR on alveolar macrophages after dosing compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and clinical end-points at day 28. Results 46 participants were randomised, 43 completed treatment (n=15 placebo, n=16 low dose and n=12 high dose), and BAL was performed on 38 participants before and after treatment. Although the composite biological GI-HOPE score did not reach significance (p>0.05), high-dose treatment caused upregulation of HLA-DR and CD206 on alveolar macrophages, indicating deposition in the alveolar compartment and beneficial macrophage activation (HLA-DR: p=0.0406 versus low dose, p=0.1841 versus placebo; CD206: p=0.009 versus low dose, p=0.0179 versus placebo). High-dose rhGM-CSF treatment revealed a favourable profile of oxygenation at the end of analysis compared to time-points before inhalation (p=0.095 and p=0.0175) or compared to the low-dose and placebo groups (p=0.0063 and p=0.0198; visit 13), and was associated with decreased SOFA scores in the high-dose group over time (p=0.0013 and p=0.00023 compared to low dose and placebo). Importantly, inhaled rhGM-CSF did not increase alveolar or systemic inflammation. Conclusion Inhalation of 450 μg rhGM-CSF was safe, and promoted a favourable profile regarding alveolar macrophage activation, oxygenation and SOFA scores over time; however, it did not lead to differences in the GI-HOPE score.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
H. Orozco, J. Arch, H. Medina-Franco, et al.
Archives of surgery, 2006
- Sepsis
- Peritonitis
- Ceftriaxone
B. Kopf, U. de Giorgi, B. Vertogen, et al.
Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2006
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization
- Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
- Neoplasms
M Sbracia, F Scarpellini
Human Reproduction, 2022
B.C. Trapnell, Y. Inoue, F. Bonella, et al.
B16. ILD THERAPY II, 2020
Francesco Bonella, Yoshikazu Inoue, Inge Tarnow, et al.
1.5 Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease, 2016
Bruce C. Trapnell, Yoshikazu Inoue, Francesco Bonella, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Oxygen
Francesco Recchia, Sandro De Filippis, Pierfederico Torchio, et al.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Neoplasms
- Cyclophosphamide
- Carboplatin
A. Kumar
Yearbook of Critical Care Medicine, 2007
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Investigational
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Not available
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 38 of 38 interactions
ATC L03AA03
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Molgramostim
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72