Menotrophin 1,200unit powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Menotropins contains follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) purified from the urine of postmenopausal women.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Menotrophin
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Menotrophin
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Menotrophin
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Part of the Meriofert brand family (generic: Menotrophin)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Menotrophin on the MHRA register
Menopur 1,200unit powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
75 unit
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 1 · Trials: 29 · 1987–2025
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Wex J, Abou-Setta AM
2013
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-analog type, fertilization method, and number of embryos available for cryopreservation should be incorporated into economic evaluations of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH), as they may affect treatment costs. We searched for randomized trials and meta-analyses comparing HP-hMG and r-hFSH. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in live births (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.01), but a greater number of oocytes with r-hFSH (mean difference [MD] 1.96, 95% CI 1.02-2.90). Using a cost-minimization model for Sweden, accounting for embryo availability, survival following thawing, and patient dropout, we simulated patients individually for up to three cycles. R-hFSH was found to be cost-saving, at 2,767 kr (95% CI 1,580-4,057) per patient (€315 or $411); baseline savings were 6.43% of the total HP-hMG cost. In fresh cycles only, the savings for r-hFSH were 1,752 kr (95% CI 48-3,658) per patient (€200 or $260). In univariate sensitivity analyses, savings were obtained until the price of r-hFSH increased by 30% or the dosage of HP-hMG decreased by 38%-62% of baseline value. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, r-hFSH was cost-saving in 100% of the simulated cohort per patient and in 85% per live birth; the respective percentages for fresh cycles only were 97.3% and 73.1%. In conclusion, a greater number of oocytes with r-hFSH allows for more frozen embryo transfers, thereby reducing overall treatment cost.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
M. Filicori, G. Cognigni, P. Pocognoli, et al.
Human reproduction, 2002
- Ovarian Follicle
- Testosterone
- Progesterone
James Brader, Robin Ramphul
Cureus, 2025
A woman in her 20s developed IgA vasculitis with nephritis (IgAVN), which started four days after oocyte donation (for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) and transfer to another recipient). Prior to oocyte retrieval, the patient received a course of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with menotrophin, ganirelix acetate and choriogonadotropin alfa. Four days after COS, she developed a painful purpuric rash alongside knee pain and swelling. Prednisolone was started for presumed IgA vasculitis. Soon after, she developed de novo mononeuritis multiplex and renal dysfunction characterised by haematoproteinuria and nephrotic syndrome. A kidney biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of IgAVN. Symptoms improved over time; however, there remained questions about the possible trigger. The induced sex hormone changes associated with COS may have had an immunomodulatory effect, leading to disease development.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Caixia Liu
Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 2024
Peter Platteau, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Adam Balen, et al.
Human Reproduction, 2006
- Ovarian Follicle
- Anovulation
- Infertility, Female
Richard Fleming, C. C. Chung, R. Yates, et al.
Human reproduction, 1996
University Hospital, Ghent
2025
Trial registration — a registered study, not a published result.
In current treatments for In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), the creation of multiple embryos is a common practice. The decision to transfer an embryo is traditionally based on the morphological assessment by an embryologist, which, due to its nature, must be considered subjective. In certain regions, invasive embryo biopsy techniques, such as Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A), are used to detect chromosomal abnormalities and support decision-making regarding embryo transfer. However, there is a medical need to improve the outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles through non-invasive and objective methods. As an academic center, our goal is to investigate promising innovative methods that, if successful, can be integrated into standard care. The aim of the Aurora blastocyst study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Aurora test in selecting five-day-old embryos for fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Additionally, the study assesses whether the use of the Aurora test results in an increase in clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates. The Aurora test is a non-invasive test for evaluating oocyte competence and subsequently the embryo obtained in an ICSI cycle (In Vitro Fertilization). This test is performed on cumulus cells (CC) surrounding the oocyte and uses mRNA expression profiles to evaluate the developmental potential of the oocytes. The test has been developed and validated for patients stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropins (HP-hMG), an ovulatory dose of hCG, and a single embryo transfer on day 3. The test will be performed by Fertiga nv, upon receiving patients cumulus cells. At our center, based on earlier research, the standard care involves a single embryo transfer on day 5. In this study, embryo selection based on morphology is compared with embryo selection based on morphology and the Aurora test. Finally, this study aims to evaluate the impact of the Aurora test score on the embryologist's selection decision for transferring a five-day-old embryo for single embryo transfer, by assessing parameters such as pregnancy rates and live birth rates. Conditions: Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology. Interventions: Aurora-Blasto.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (public domain)
Granata Bio Corporation
2025
Trial registration — a registered study, not a published result.
The goal of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial is toto evaluate the efficacy and safety of a human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in the development of multiple follicles, pregnancy, and cumulative live birth as part of an Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) cycle in in women with a diagnosis of infertility. Conditions: Infertility (IVF Patients). Interventions: hMG subcutaneous injection, Placebo.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (public domain)
ART Fertility Clinics LLC
2025
Trial registration — a registered study, not a published result.
Gonal-F® (follitropin alfa) is a recombinant FSH without LH activity, while Menopur® contains both LH and hCG. The MEGASET trial compared Menopur® and Gonal-F® in GnRH antagonist cycles with SET, showing similar efficacy. A subsequent study (MEGASET-HR) in high responders found ongoing pregnancy rates of 35.5% for Menopur® and 30.7% for Gonal-F®, with a lower early pregnancy loss for Menopur® (14.5% vs 25.5%). Telomere length (TL) in oocyte cumulus cells (CC) correlates with oocyte quality and embryo outcomes. This study aims to assess whether stimulation type (hMG vs. Gonal-F) affects TL in CC and subsequent blastocyst development. A randomized, open-label, cross-over study in normo-responders will analyze telomere length, embryo quality, and hormonal markers. Conditions: OVARIAN STIMULATION, Telomere Length, Telomere Length, Mean Leukocyte.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (public domain)
Huo Y, Yan ZQ, Yuan P, et al.
2020
- Oocytes
- Blastocyst
- Mice, Inbred C57BL
BackgroundEpigenetic abnormalities caused by superovulation have recently attracted increasing attention. Superovulation with exogenous hormones may prevent oocytes from establishing an appropriate epigenetic state, and this effect may extend to the methylation programming in preimplantation embryos, as de novo DNA methylation is a function of developmental stage of follicles and oocyte size. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) are common gonadotropins used for superovulation, and appropriate concentrations of these gonadotropins might be necessary. However, no systematic study on the effects of DNA methylation alterations in oocytes associated with superovulation with different dosages of FSH/hMG at the single-cell level has yet been reported. In the current study, different dosages of FSH/hMG combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) were used in female mice to generate experimental groups, while naturally matured oocytes and oocytes superovulated with only hCG were respectively used as controls. Single-cell level DNA methylation sequencing was carried out on all these matured oocytes.ResultsIn this study, we revealed that the genome-wide methylation pattern and CG methylation level of the maternal imprinting control regions of all mature oocytes were globally conserved and stable. However, methylation alterations associated with superovulation were found at a specific set of loci, and the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) mainly occurred in regions other than promoters. Furthermore, some of the annotated genes in the DMRs were involved in biological processes such as glucose metabolism, nervous system development, cell cycle, cell proliferation, and embryo implantation and were altered in all dosages of FSH/hMG group (for example, Gfod2 and SYF2). Other genes were impaired only after high gonadotropin dosages (for instance, Sox17 and Phactr4).ConclusionsIn conclusion, the current study addressed the effects of superovulation on DNA methylation from the perspective of different dosages of gonadotropins at the single-cell level. We found that the genome-wide DNA methylation landscape was globally preserved irrespective of superovulation or of the kind and dosage of gonadotropins used, whereas the methylation alterations associated with superovulation occurred at a specific set of loci. These observed effects reflect that superovulation recruits oocytes that would not normally be ovulated or that have not undergone complete epigenetic maturation. Our results provide an important reference for the safety assessment of superovulation with different dosages of gonadotropins. However, it should be noted that this study has some limitations, as the sample number and library coverage of analyzed oocytes were relatively low. Future studies with larger sample sizes and high-coverage libraries that examine the effects of superovulation on embryo development and offspring health as well as the underlying mechanisms are still needed.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Being a combination drug, Menotropins bind to the follicle stimulating hormone r…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
2 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:11847099 PMID:24058690 PMID:24692546
Through cAMP production activates the downstream PI3K-AKT and ERK1/ERK2 signaling pathways PMID:24058690
PMID:11847099
The activity of this receptor is mediated by G proteins which activate adenylate cyclase PMID:11847099
ATC G03GA02
ATC G03GA03
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Menotropins
Matched from: Menotrophin
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
7369
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:3969
GenAtlas
FSHR
GeneCards
FSHR
GenBank Gene Database
M65085
GenBank Protein Database
182771
Guide to Pharmacology
253
UniProt Accession
FSHR_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:6585
GenAtlas
LHCGR
GeneCards
LHCGR
GenBank Gene Database
M73746
GenBank Protein Database
903746
Guide to Pharmacology
254
UniProt Accession
LSHR_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72