Lidocaine 4% / Tetracaine 0.5% / Adrenaline (base) 0.1% gel

(1) Background: Systemic mastocytosis is a rare, non-curable disease with potential life-threatening complications in patients receiving cardiac surgery. (2) Methods: This systematic review of the literature was prompted by the case of a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction during cardiac surgery related to systemic mastocytosis. The search of all types of studies, using several databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science), was conducted through September 2022 to identify the relevant studies. (3) Results: Twelve studies were included describing cases of patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were diagnosed with systemic mastocytosis. An adverse effect, namely anaphylaxis, has happened in three cases. Different strategies of premedication, intraoperative and postoperative management were used. In our case, the patient was admitted for elective biological aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis. Intraoperatively, the patient developed an anaphylactic shock during the administration of protamine after separation from the cardiopulmonary bypass. This anaphylaxis reaction was a complication of the pre-existing systemic mastocytosis and could be successfully managed by the administration of epinephrine, antihistamines and corticosteroids. (4) Conclusions: This systematic literature search and case report highlight the importance of careful preoperative planning, as well as coordination between cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and hemato-oncological specialists, in patients with rare but complication-prone diseases such as systemic mastocytosis.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Pediatric facial lacerations are common injuries that carry important cosmetic and psychosocial implications. Prompt, evidence-based management focusing on optimal wound closure, early wound care, and scar prevention is essential to achieving favorable long-term outcomes. This review summarizes findings from a comprehensive literature review conducted from 2010 to 2025, drawing from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines addressing pediatric facial laceration repair, wound care practices, scar prevention, and caregiver involvement. Practical interventions accessible over the counter (OTC) were emphasized. Evidence supports the use of topical anesthetics such as lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine (LET) gel to reduce procedural pain, copious irrigation with potable water, and wound closure methods tailored to the injury's characteristics, including tissue adhesives and absorbable sutures. Routine systemic antibiotics are not indicated for clean facial wounds. Early moist wound care with petrolatum promotes faster healing, while scar prevention measures such as silicone therapy, sun protection, scar massage, and tension offloading techniques significantly improve cosmetic outcomes. Over-the-counter products such as onion extract and vitamin E offer minimal benefit compared to silicone-based therapies. Parental education on wound care, emotional reassurance, and scar management plays a pivotal role in optimizing healing and minimizing the psychosocial impact of facial scars in children. Through collaboration between clinicians and caregivers, excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes can be achieved, helping children heal both physically and emotionally.

Abstract licence: CC BY

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assist clinicians in determining the optimal patient-specific method of analgesia during radial artery puncture by comparing radial artery puncture procedural pain. We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the prophylactic efficacy of local anesthesia for radial artery puncture-associated pain. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online in January 2023, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in January 2023, the Excerpta Medica Database in December 2022, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal in January 2023, and ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2023. We synthesized the pain scores (0-100 scale) using the frequentist random-effects NMA model. We evaluated the confidence in each outcome using the CINeMA tool (https://cinema.ispm.unibe.ch/). We conducted an NMA of 1,619 patients across 14 studies on pain scores during radial artery puncture-related procedures for 12 interventions. Compared with placebo, mepivacaine infiltration and lidocaine spray probably reduce pain (mean difference (MD): -47.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): -61.45 to -33.89, confidence rating (CR): moderate; MD: -27.38, 95% CI: -37.53 to -17.22, CR: moderate). Of the 32 studies included, none reported systemic adverse events, such as anaphylaxis or local anesthetic systemic toxicity, or severe local adverse events. In conclusion, mepivacaine infiltration and lidocaine spray probably reduce the pain associated with radial artery puncture more than other local anesthesia.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundTopical local analgesic and anaesthetic agents have been used both pre- and immediately post-harvest on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site wounds (DSW). There is no systematic review of their effectiveness in providing post-harvest analgesia, or of the possible toxic effects of systemic absorption. This study is designed to address the question of which agent, if any, is favoured over the others and whether there are any safety data regarding their use.MethodsSystematic literature review of randomised controlled trials of topical agents applied to STSG DSWs, with a view to providing analgesia. Studies identified via search of Cochrane and EBSCO databases. No restrictions on language or publication year. Primary outcomes: pain at the time of (awake) STSG, and post-harvest pain (up to first dressing change). Secondary outcome was serum medication levels relative to published data on toxic doses. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool utilised in assessment of included studies. At least 2 reviewers screened and reviewed included studies. A narrative review is presented.ResultsThere were 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Overall methodological quality and patient numbers were low. Topical eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine pre-harvest affords good local anaesthesia in awake STSG harvesting. Topical bupivacaine (5 studies) or lidocaine (1 study) gave significantly better post-harvest anaesthesia/analgesia than placebo. Topical morphine performs no better than placebo. Topical local anaesthetic agents at reported doses were all well below toxic serum levels.ConclusionsTopical local anaesthetics (lidocaine or bupivacaine) provide good analgesia, both during and after STSG harvest, at well below toxic serum levels, but there are no good data determining the best local anaesthetic agent to use. There is no evidence morphine performs better than placebo.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Study objectiveDigital nerve blocks (DNBs) provide local anesthesia for minor procedures of the digits. Several DNB techniques have been described, but it is unclear which technique provides adequate anesthesia with the least pain. DNB techniques can be grouped into a dorsal approach, which requires 2 injections, versus 3 different types of volar approaches, which require a single injection. We performed a meta-analysis to compare DNB techniques with respect to time to anesthesia (TTA), duration of anesthesia (DOA), and pain of injection. We also reviewed data on degree and distribution of anesthesia and discuss the techniques preferred by study participants and clinicians performing injections.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases with terms "digital block," "digital nerve block," "local anesthetic," "local anesthesia," "lidocaine," and/or "bupivacaine."Study selectionRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) were prioritized, though high-quality prospective cohort studies were also eligible. All included studies evaluated DNB techniques or anesthetics. There were 23 papers (21 RCTs, 2 prospective descriptive studies) included.Data extractionDNBs studied included dorsal ring block, traditional dorsal block, transthecal block, modified transthecal block, and volar subcutaneous digital blocks. Outcomes measured included TTA, DOA, pain of injection scores, and degree of anesthesia.ResultsOverall, mean TTA was 4.5 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5, 5.6), mean DOA was 187 minutes (95% CI 104.3, 269.7), and mean pain score was 2.1 out of 10 (95% CI 1.3, 2.8) without significant differences between studies or techniques.ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in the outcomes of TTA, DOA, and pain of injection between different DNB techniques. Single-injection volar approaches may be preferred by participants and clinicians over dorsal approaches that require 2 injections, particularly with respect to pain. However, 2-injection dorsal approaches may have better coverage of the proximal dorsal surface based on degree and distribution of anesthesia.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

PurposeThe aim was to investigate the time for intubation, adverse events and the comfort score of ultrasound-guided internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve block in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) undergoing awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation.MethodsSixty patients with COPD who needed awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation were randomly and evenly divided into the ultrasound-guided internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve block group (group S) and the control group (group C). All patients received procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine and adequate topical anaesthesia of the upper respiratory tract. Then, bilateral block was performed (with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine or the same volume of saline) followed by fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation. The primary outcomes were time for intubation, adverse reactions and comfort score. The secondary outcomes were haemodynamic changes and serum norepinephrine (NE) and adrenaline (AD) concentrations immediately before intubation (T0); immediately after intubation to the laryngopharynx (T1); and immediately (T2), 5 min (T3) and 10 min (T4) after intubation between the groups.ResultsCompared with group C, the time for intubation, the incidence of adverse reactions and the comfort score in group S were significantly lower (PPP>0.05). MAP, HR, NE and AD at T1-T4 were significantly lower in group S than in group C (PConclusionUltrasound-guided internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve block can effectively shorten the time for intubation, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, improve comfort score, maintain considerable haemodynamic stability and inhibit stress response in patients with severe COPD undergoing awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BackgroundThe injection of local anesthetics, an extremely painful procedure, leads to a reduction of patients' acceptance.ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of 4% tetracaine gel (TG) and lidocaine-prilocaine cream (LPC) on reducing the local anesthetic injection pain for upper eyelid blepharoplasty.MethodsSixty participants were equally divided into three groups. Each patient in two treatment groups was assigned a pair of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and 4% TG, and the blank control group did not receive any topical anesthetic. The primary outcome was the pain score associated with anesthetic injection. The secondary outcomes included the local cutaneous reactions and eyelid edema in 24 h postoperatively.ResultsThe NRS score in the control group was 6.65 ± 1.60, in the 4% TG and EMLA sides of 5.75 ± 1.62 and 6.25 ± 1.48 in group A, without statistically significant (p = 0.334, 0.067, respectively). While in group B, the injection pain scores in 4% TG and EMLA sides were 4.65 ± 1.66 and 5.5 ± 1.73 (p ConclusionIn comparison to LPC, 4% TG showed a stronger anesthetic effect on reducing injection pain after 60-minute application. It also generally presented a higher frequency of cutaneous reactions but didn't affect the eyelid edema 24 h postoperatively.Trial registrationThis study was registered at chictr.org (the first registration date is 03/04/2023, and the registration number is ChiCTR2300070153).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundThis study compared topical anesthesia to a combination of topical anesthesia and subconjunctival anesthesia for phacoemulsification.MethodsThis double-blinded parallel placebo-controlled randomized trial involved senile cataract patients scheduled for phacoemulsification between May and December 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either topical anesthesia with 0.5% tetracaine hydrochloride and subconjunctival balanced salt solution injection (Control group) or topical anesthesia and subconjunctival injection with 2% lidocaine (Lidocaine group). Baseline parameters, cataract grades, and various outcomes were recorded, including pain scores at specific time points, patient cooperation scores, requests for additional anesthesia, and complications. Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, the t-test, ordinal logistic regression, and linear regression with robust standard errors.ResultsIn total, 176 patients were included in the study after excluding 33 patients. A significant reduction in immediate postoperative pain was achieved in the Lidocaine group (p ConclusionsThe addition of subconjunctival lidocaine injection to topical anesthesia reduced postoperative pain and improved patient cooperation during phacoemulsification. However, the lidocaine injection was painful, and it carried a higher risk of spontaneous-relief subconjunctival hemorrhage.Trial registrationTrial Registration Number: TCTR20220804003, date of registration August 4, 2022, retrospectively registered.

Abstract licence: CC BY