Bupivacaine liposomal 266mg/20ml prolonged-release dispersion for injection vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Bupivacaine liposomal
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 28 · Randomised trials: 22 · 2016–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
N. Hussain, Jarod Speer, F. Abdallah
Anesthesiology, 2024
Alexandre Nguyen, S. Grape, M. Gobbetti, et al.
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2023
M. Fares, M. Daher, P. Boufadel, et al.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2025
Longyi Zhang, Shun Yang, Xian-Chun Liu, et al.
Frontiers in Medicine, 2025
Machado GF, Mokhtar J, Romão VT, et al.
2026
Bo Jiao, Xiaolin Xu, Caiyi Yan, et al.
BMJ Open, 2025
Rahul Muchintala, Nathaniel Kern, Gaston Davis, et al.
SurgiColl, 2024
Jin H, Wang B
2026
BackgroundThoracoscopic surgery has become the standard approach for many thoracic conditions. Despite its advantages, postoperative pain remains a significant cause of complications. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), an extended-release local analgesic, has been introduced to enhance recovery. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compares the efficacy of LB vs. non-liposomal local anesthetics in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for RCTs published from the inception of each database to November 2025. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 (RoB 1) tool, and the quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE system. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hours, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption at 48 hours, 72 hours, and during total hospitalization; pain scores assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and over the entire hospitalization period; length of hospital stay (LOS); and time to first ambulation. Data were synthesized using Review Manager (RevMan; version 5.4).ResultsNine RCTs involving 915 patients were included. Compared to the control group, LB significantly reduced opioid consumption at 24 hours [mean difference (MD) =-1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.42, -1.24; PConclusionsLB provides superior short-term analgesia but does not improve functional recovery outcomes compared to non-liposomal local anesthetics.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Hu J, Zhang K, Ma Z, et al.
Journal of Pain Research, 2026
Qian Cao, Rong-Mu Lin, Yan Liu, et al.
Frontiers in Medicine, 2026
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.