Gonadorelin 100microgram powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Gonadorelin is another name for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH).
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Gonadorelin
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Gonadorelin
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Gonadorelin on the MHRA register
HRF 100microgram powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Gonadorelin 100microgram powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 16 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 1 · 2023–2026
Showing all 16 studies, sorted by most relevant.
F. Torrini, S. Scarano, P. Palladino, et al.
Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2023
- Peptide Hormones
- Molecular Imprinting
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
In the last twenty years, we have witnessed an important evolution of bioanalytical approaches moving from conventional lab bench instrumentation to simpler, easy-to-use techniques to deliver analytical responses on-site, with reduced analysis times and costs. In this frame, affinity reagents production has also jointly advanced from natural receptors to biomimetic, abiotic receptors, animal-free produced. Among biomimetic ones, aptamers, and molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) play a leading role. Herein, our motivation is to provide insights into the evolution of conventional and innovative analytical approaches based on chromatography, immunochemistry, and affinity sensing referred to as peptide hormones. Indeed, the analysis of peptide hormones represents a current challenge for biomedical, pharmaceutical, and anti-doping analysis. Specifically, as a paradigmatic example, we report the case of gonadorelin, a neuropeptide that in recent years has drawn a lot of attention as a therapeutic drug misused in doping practices during sports competitions.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Kim YJ, Hwangbo J, Park KH, et al.
2024
PURPOSE: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test is the gold standard for diagnosing central precocious puberty (CPP). Gonadorelin (Relefact) is used for the test but is not always readily available; triptorelin is used as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the triptorelin test compared with the GnRH test in the diagnosis of CPP in girls. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 girls with premature thelarche (PT) who underwent a hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis evaluation. In the overall group, 50 girls were tested with intravenous gonadorelin (Relefact) and 50 girls were tested with subcutaneous triptorelin acetate (Decapeptyl). Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were measured at baseline and 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after gonadorelin injection or 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after triptorelin injection. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics of age, height, weight, body mass index, and bone age were similar between the 2 groups. The highest LH level was reached 60 minutes after stimulation in both groups. Approximately 20% of the gonadorelin group and 24% of the triptorelin group were diagnosed with CPP (P=0.52). Among those diagnosed with CPP, the mean peak LH concentrations were 8.15 mIU/mL and 9.73 mIU/mL in the gonadorelin and triptorelin groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The triptorelin test showed similar trends of LH elevation and diagnostic rate compared with the traditional GnRH test for diagnosing CPP. This suggests that the triptorelin test may be a valid alternative to the GnRH test for differentiating CPP from self-limiting PT. Our study also demonstrated that a triptorelin stimulation test for up to 120 minutes was sufficient to diagnose CPP.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
D. Melo, W. Coelho, T. C. Marques, et al.
Journal of dairy science, 2024
- Estrus Synchronization
- Insemination, Artificial
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
The initial ovulatory response during synchronization programs is often low in dairy heifers, largely due to follicular dynamics and hormonal dynamics. Specifically, the progesterone concentration (P4) at the time of the first GnRH treatment in a breeding program can influence the LH response, often resulting in a suboptimal ovulatory response. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the highest label dose 200 μg (100 μg vs. 200 μg) of GnRH (50 μg gonadorelin hydrochloride per mL; Factrel®; Zoetis Inc. Madison, NJ) at the first GnRH of a 6-d CoSynch plus P4 device program on ovulatory response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in first service in Holstein heifers. A total of 1308 Holstein heifers were randomly allocated at the beginning of a 6-d CIDR-Synch program, Day 0, to receive either i.m. treatment of 100 μg (2CC, n = 655) or 200 μg (4CC, n = 653) of GnRH. Also, at Day 0, heifers received an intravaginal insert with 1.38 g of P4 (Eazi-Breed CIDR® Cattle Insert; Zoetis Inc., Madison, NJ). On Day 6, the insert was removed, and i.m. treatment of 25 mg of PGF2α (12.5 mg dinoprost tromethamine/mL; Lutalyse® HighCon Injection Zoetis) was administered. On Day 7, a second i.m. treatment of 25 mg of PGF2α was given, followed on Day 9 by concurrent i.m. treatment of 100 μg of GnRH and timed AI (TAI). A subset of 396 heifers had their ovaries scanned to evaluate ovulatory response, and blood samples were collected to measure the serum concentration of P4 at Day 0 and Day 6 of the study. The P4 concentrations at Day 0 were categorized as Low (≤3ng/mL) or High (>3ng/mL). The ovulatory response was greater for heifers receiving 4CC than 2CC at Day 0 (54.7% vs. 42.8%). The ovulatory response was greater for Low P4 than High P4 at Day 0 (54.3% vs. 37.8%). However, there was not an interaction between treatment and P4 concentrations (Low P4 2CC = 48.6% vs. High P4 2CC = 30.0%; Low P4 4CC = 60.0% vs. High P4 4CC = 45.5%). The ROC curve analysis indicates that P4 concentrations at Day 0 treatment could predict the ovulatory response, although the area under the curve was only 0.6. As expected, heifers that ovulated had increased P/AI (No = 55.6% vs. Yes = 67.7%); however, there was no effect of treatment on P/AI (2CC = 63.3% vs. 4CC = 59.6%), nor interactions between treatment and ovulation and treatment and P4 (HIGH vs LOW) for pregnancy outcomes. In summary, P4 concentration and increasing the dose of GnRH at Day 0 positively impacted ovulatory response in Holstein heifers. However, there was no interaction between treatment and P4 on ovulation and no subsequent impact of GnRH dose on P/AI.
Abstract licence: CC BY
T. Valdés-Arciniega, I. Leão, E. Anta-Galván, et al.
Journal of dairy science, 2023
- Lactation
- Progesterone
- Cattle
, ∼32 h later GnRH [G2], and ∼16 h later timed artificial insemination [TAI]) for first service, randomly received either 100 μg or 200 μg of GnRH (gonadorelin hydrochloride) at G1 (primiparous, 64-75 DIM; multiparous, 59-70 DIM). Ovulation was determined by ultrasound 2 d after G1 (n = 1,294) and 2 d after G2 (n = 1,020). Blood samples were collected at G1 and at PG1 d to evaluate serum progesterone (P4) concentrations. Conventional (n = 314, Angus; n = 1,084, Holstein) and Holstein sexed semen (n = 276) were used. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32, 46, 88, and 200 post-TAI. The high dose of GnRH (200 μg) increased overall ovulatory response to G1 compared with 100 μg (81.3% vs. 65.1%), being similar between parities (primiparous, 72.2%; multiparous, 73.9%). Mean serum P4 concentrations at PG1 did not differ between treatments (100 µg: 9.59 ± 0.15 ng/mL vs. 200 µg: 9.43 ± 0.15 ng/mL). Cows with no ovulation to G1 had higher serum P4 concentrations at G1 than cows with ovulation to G1 (6.27 ± 0.19 ng/mL vs. 4.66 ± 0.07 ng/mL). At PG1, the proportion of cows with functional corpus luteum (98.7% vs. 89.7%) and serum P4 concentrations (9.68 ± 0.12 ng/mL vs. 9.14 ± 0.22 ng/mL) were greater in cows that ovulated to G1 compared with cows that did not ovulate. Also, cows that ovulated to G1 had a greater increase in serum P4 concentrations from G1 to PG1 than cows with no ovulation (5.26 ± 0.12 ng/mL vs. 3.32 ± 0.25 ng/mL). The high dose of GnRH improved overall P/AI at 32 d post-TAI in cows inseminated with conventional semen (54.6% vs. 48.2%) and tended to improve P/AI on 46 (48.8% vs. 44.9%), 88 (47.6% vs. 43.4%), and 200 (45.3% vs. 41.2%) d post-TAI. Primiparous cows inseminated with conventional semen had better P/AI than multiparous cows at d 32 (58.2% vs. 49.4%), 46 (55.1% vs. 44.4%), 88 (53.2% vs. 43.2%) and 200 (51.6% vs. 40.7%) post-TAI. Primiparous cows treated with 200 µg GnRH had lower P/AI on d 32, 46, 88, and 200 post-TAI when inseminated with sexed semen than with conventional semen. In summary, the higher dose of GnRH at G1 improved ovulatory response and P/AI at d 32 post-TAI and tended to improve P/AI at d 46, 88, and 200 post-TAI in cows inseminated with conventional semen. Moreover, the effect of treatment on P/AI in primiparous cows depended on semen type (conventional vs. sexed semen).
Abstract licence: CC BY
I. Leão, M. E. El Azzi, E. Anta-Galván, et al.
Journal of dairy science, 2023
- Estrus Synchronization
- Lactation
- Cattle
Our objective was to determine the effect of a 200 µg dose of gonadorelin hydrochloride 25 d after previous artificial insemination (AI) in a Resynch-25 resynchronization program on ovulatory response, circulating progesterone (P4) concentrations before and after treatment, and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) compared with a 100 µg dose in lactating Holstein cows. Experimental d 0 was considered the day of the previous AI. Lactating dairy cows (n = 3,240) with an average of 126 d in milk (DIM) and between 1 to 6 services were randomly assigned to receive 100 µg or 200 µg of gonadorelin hydrochloride on d 25 (GnRH25). On d 32 post-AI, cows diagnosed nonpregnant with the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) detected by ultrasound (n = 1,249) received PGF2α treatments on d 32 and 33, followed by a GnRH 32 h later and AI 16 h after this last GnRH. Blood samples were collected on d 25, 32, and 34 to evaluate serum P4 concentrations. Transrectal ultrasonographic examination was performed on d 25 and 27 to assess ovulatory response to GnRH25. Cows were checked for pregnancy on d 32, 46, and 88 after AI. The larger dose of GnRH increased the overall proportion of cows that ovulated to the GnRH25 (100 µg: 25.0% vs. 200 µg: 32.5%). However, when cows were evaluated separately according to the pregnancy status on d 32 post-AI, there was no treatment effect within cows pregnant and nonpregnant. Even though treatment increased the proportion of cows with serum P4 ≤ 0.42 ng/mL at G2 (100µg: 86.2% vs. 200µg: 93.0%), it did not affect P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88. Furthermore, a greater proportion of cows without a functional CL at GnRH25 had circulating P4 concentrations ≥1.00 ng/mL on d 32 and lower than 0.42 ng/mL on G2. These cows also had a greater P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88. In summary, the larger dose of GnRH on d 25 post-AI did not increase the ovulatory response in nonpregnant cows and P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88 after AI after the Resynch-25 program. Additionally, nonpregnant cows without a functional CL at GnRH25 were better synchronized after the Resynch-25 protocol and had greater P/AI on d 32, 46, and 88 after timed-AI.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Md. Monirul Islam, Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Talukder, Nazmun Naher, et al.
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 2025
<b>Objective:</b> Embryo vitrification facilitates multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) application in the sheep industry through the storage and transfer of genetically superior embryos. This study assessed the survival rate of vitrified embryos following direct transfer under field conditions. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Thirty-five donors and 46 recipient ewes were synchronized for estrus using two injections of Cloprostenol. Superovulation was induced with 25 mg porcine follicle- stimulating hormone per donor twice daily for 4 days. Recipients were treated with 250 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin during the second injection of cloprostenol to ensure ovulation. Estrus donors were mated with rams. Embryos were collected on day 6 post-mating using a modified inguinal laparotomy and graded. Grade 1 embryos were vitrified in a medium containing tissue culture medium 199, 10% ethylene glycol, 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, and 0.5M sucrose and stored in liquid nitrogen. Following thawing, embryos were directly transferred to recipients through an open-pulled straw following an inguinal laparotomy. Sixteen recipients were treated with 20 μg Gonadorelin immediately after embryo transfer. <b>Results:</b> Onset and duration of estrus in donor and recipient ewes were 30.2 ± 0.8, 27.9 ± 0.6, and 33.7 ± 0.4, 27.50 ± 0.42 h, respectively. Corpora lutea number and recovered embryos/donor were 8.47 ± 0.68 and 6.93 ± 0.57, respectively. 85.7% of donors responded to superovulation treatment, and the embryo recovery rate was 82.5%. Grade 1 embryos per donor (5.5 ± 0.8) were significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than all other grades. Pregnancy rates in recipients treated with Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (<i>GnRH</i>) and without <i>GnRH</i> treatment were 62.5% and 56.6%, respectively. The respective lambing rates were 80% and 76.5%. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings indicate the potential on-farm application of direct transfer of vitrified embryos in facilitating a MOET program for genetic improvement of sheep in Bangladesh.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Pablo Garcia-Acero, Ismael Henarejos-Castillo, Francisco Jose Sanz, et al.
Pharmaceutics, 2025
Background: Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) may occur when two or more drugs are taken together, leading to undesired side effects or potential synergistic effects. Most clinical effects of drug combinations have not been assessed in clinical trials. Therefore, predicting DDIs can provide better patient management, avoid drug combinations that can negatively affect patient care, and exploit potential synergistic combinations to improve current therapies in women’s healthcare. Methods: A DDI prediction model was built to describe relevant drug combinations affecting reproductive treatments. Approved drug features (chemical structure of drugs, side effects, targets, enzymes, carriers and transporters, pathways, protein–protein interactions, and interaction profile fingerprints) were obtained. A unified predictive score revealed unknown DDIs between reproductive and commonly used drugs and their associated clinical effects on reproductive health. The performance of the prediction model was validated using known DDIs. Results: This prediction model accurately predicted known interactions (AUROC = 0.9876) and identified 2991 new DDIs between 192 drugs used in different female reproductive conditions and other drugs used to treat unrelated conditions. These DDIs included 836 between drugs used for in vitro fertilization. Most new DDIs involved estradiol, acetaminophen, bupivacaine, risperidone, and follitropin. Follitropin, bupivacaine, and gonadorelin had the highest discovery rate (42%, 32%, and 25%, respectively). Some were expected to improve current therapies (n = 23), while others would cause harmful effects (n = 11). We also predicted twelve DDIs between oral contraceptives and HIV drugs that could compromise their efficacy. Conclusions: These results show the importance of DDI studies aimed at identifying those that might compromise or improve their efficacy, which could lead to personalizing female reproductive therapies.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Jungmin Ahn, Youngin Lee, Seongmin Gim, et al.
Children, 2023
Background: The gold standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test uses the response to intravenously injected gonadorelin to diagnose central precocious puberty (CPP). However, gonadorelin is not always readily available. Objective: This study investigated the diagnostic efficacy of the subcutaneous triptorelin test and the optimal blood sampling time for diagnosis of CPP. Methods: This study retrospectively examined the medical records of 220 girls who had undergone either the triptorelin or gonadorelin test and compared their clinical characteristics. We retrospectively compared clinical parameters between girls diagnosed with CPP (n = 111) and idiopathic premature thelarche (IPT) (n = 109) using three different diagnostic methods: the gonadorelin, triptorelin 120 min, and triptorelin 180 min tests. The diagnostic ability of the stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration in the triptorelin test for CPP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The CPP group exhibited higher basal and peak gonadotropin levels, more advanced bone age, and a lower body mass index standard deviation score than the IPT group. In the gonadorelin test group, all girls with CPP exhibited a peak LH response 30–60 min after intravenous gonadorelin injection. In the triptorelin test group, most girls with CPP exhibited a peak LH response 60–180 min after subcutaneous triptorelin injection (n = 68). On the ROC curve, a peak LH concentration of ≥ 4.52 IU/L at 120 min had the highest CPP diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 95.83%, respectively.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sakshi Gautam, Anamika Thakur, Akanksha Rajput, et al.
Viruses, 2023
- Dengue Virus
- Drug Repositioning
- Machine Learning
Dengue outbreaks persist in global tropical regions, lacking approved antivirals, necessitating critical therapeutic development against the virus. In this context, we developed the “Anti-Dengue” algorithm that predicts dengue virus inhibitors using a quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and MLTs. Using the “DrugRepV” database, we extracted chemicals (small molecules) and repurposed drugs targeting the dengue virus with their corresponding IC50 values. Then, molecular descriptors and fingerprints were computed for these molecules using PaDEL software. Further, these molecules were split into training/testing and independent validation datasets. We developed regression-based predictive models employing 10-fold cross-validation using a variety of machine learning approaches, including SVM, ANN, kNN, and RF. The best predictive model yielded a PCC of 0.71 on the training/testing dataset and 0.81 on the independent validation dataset. The created model’s reliability and robustness were assessed using William’s plot, scatter plot, decoy set, and chemical clustering analyses. Predictive models were utilized to identify possible drug candidates that could be repurposed. We identified goserelin, gonadorelin, and nafarelin as potential repurposed drugs with high pIC50 values. “Anti-Dengue” may be beneficial in accelerating antiviral drug development against the dengue virus.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Lluis Ferré-Dolcet, Matteo Bordogna, Barbara Contiero, et al.
Animals, 2023
Background: Deslorelin implant use in cats is a medical alternative to surgical sterilization, and due to its prolonged efficacy, its use has shown growing interest in the veterinary community. In the case of breeding facilities, its removal is often requested for the early restoration of testicular function. As anti-Müllerian hormones (AMH) in males is dependent of testosterone secretion, its assay may determine the restoration of testicular steroid secretion. An average of 3 weeks has been already described for tomcats’ testicular function resumption after implant removal, but information about AMH concentrations in deslorelin-treated tomcats is lacking. Methods: Fourteen tomcats were treated for temporary suppression of fertility with a 4.7 mg deslorelin implant, which was surgically removed after 3, 6 or 9 months (n = 6, 4 and 4 tomcats, respectively). A general clinical and reproductive check with a gonadorelin stimulation test for testosterone determination was performed before deslorelin implant administration. After implant removal, tomcats’ testicles were ultrasonographically checked for volume determination every 1-2 weeks with observation of the glans penis (presence or absence of spikes) and blood collection to assay both testosterone and AMH concentrations. Results: AMH concentrations increased significantly during the deslorelin treatment from 20.95 ± 4.97 ng/mL to 82.41 ± 14.59 ng/mL (p < 0.05). Following implant removal, AMH concentrations progressively decreased to pre-treatment levels, with a value of 28.42 ± 7.98 ng/mL on the third week post-removal where testosterone secretion was again detected. Conclusions: Even if a big variability of AMH concentrations exists between male individuals, resumption of tomcats’ testicular function following a deslorelin treatment can be determined by AMH assay.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
2 to 10 minutes
Mechanism
Systemic - Like naturally occurring gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), gonad…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
2 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Half-life
2 to 10 minutes
Metabolism
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 3 of 3 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
ATC V04CM01
ATC H01CA01
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Gonadorelin
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
7330
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
11313
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
7361
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
7362
ChemSpider
33562
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:4421
GenAtlas
GNRHR
GeneCards
GNRHR
GenBank Gene Database
L03380
GenBank Protein Database
183422
Guide to Pharmacology
256
UniProt Accession
GNRHR_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:16341
GenAtlas
GNRHR2
GeneCards
GNRHR2
GenBank Gene Database
AF403014
GenBank Protein Database
16589056
UniProt Accession
GNRR2_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q20817116), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.