Glatiramer acetate 20mg powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Glatiramer
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Glatiramer
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Glatiramer
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
20 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(12)
Beta interferons and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis (TA527)
Teriflunomide for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA303)
Ocrelizumab for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA533)
Dimethyl fumarate for treating relapsing‑remitting multiple sclerosis (TA320)
Natalizumab for treating rapidly evolving severe relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA127)
Peginterferon beta-1a for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA624)
Fingolimod for the treatment of highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA254)
Ozanimod for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA706)
Cladribine for treating active relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (TA1053)
Alemtuzumab for treating highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA312)
Ofatumumab for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis (TA699)
Ponesimod for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (TA767)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 31 · Randomised trials: 9 · 2001–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
R. Voskuhl, He-jing Wang, T. C. Wu, et al.
The Lancet. Neurology, 2016
G. Comi, V. Martinelli, M. Rodegher, et al.
Lancet, 2009
D. Mikol, F. Barkhof, P. Chang, et al.
The Lancet. Neurology, 2008
De Keersmaecker AV, van Doninck E, Wens I, et al.
2025
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Remyelination
BackgroundRegenerative strategies in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) pose a significant unmet need. Combining immunomodulatory treatment with remyelinating interventions to target the complex underlying pathogenesis appeals as the next frontier in MS therapeutic developments. Therefore, it is important to identify which disease-modifying treatments (DMT) with proremyelinating properties are most promising for future use in combination treatments. This systematic review provides an overview of preclinical and clinical research on remyelination, focusing on the effects of currently available FDA and EMA-approved DMT.MethodsThe search was conducted in accordance with the "Synthesis without meta-analysis" (SWiM) reporting guideline. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO prior to the search.ResultsFifty-seven articles on preclinical research, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 29 non-randomized clinical studies, and eight reviews were included. Preclinical research suggested neuroprotective properties of various DMT. However, convincing evidence of true remyelination, either by influencing oligodendrocyte lineage cells in cell cultures or histological analysis in vivo, could only be found in studies investigating glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, Fingolimod, Siponimod, Ponesimod, and alemtuzumab. Clinical trials using surrogate markers of myelin repair, such as advanced imaging and electrophysiological techniques, demonstrated promising results with glatiramer acetate, Fingolimod, Siponimod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab. However, we found insufficient proof to claim that changes in these surrogate markers can be explained by remyelination alone.ConclusionsFuture proof-of-concept clinical trials investigating remyelinating agents in MS should consider combining outcome measures into composite endpoints. Furthermore, research efforts should be dedicated to novel biomarkers to assess repair mechanisms in MS.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Corona A, Clarelli F, Pääkkönen K, et al.
2026
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
- Interferon-beta
- Immunosuppressive Agents
Sandro Ciprian, S. Lava, G. Milani, et al.
Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2021
A. Chan, G. Cutter, R. Fox, et al.
Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2017
Ingrid Brænne, Lingyao Zeng, C. Willenborg, et al.
PLoS ONE, 2017
Gavoille A, Nourredine M, Rollot F, et al.
2026
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Registries
BackgroundTarget trial emulation (TTE) offers a formal framework for causal inference using observational data, but its validity must be evaluated in each research domain by replicating randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We aimed to replicate eight RCTs evaluating the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using French registry data.MethodsThis multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted using data extracted in December 2023 from the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) database. For each emulated trial, patients were included when they initiated one of the DMT evaluated in the corresponding RCT and met its inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were the annualised relapse rate and 3-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression. Radiological outcomes were new/enlarged T2-lesions and new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions on a brain MRI. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator was used to estimate the treatment effect adjusted for confounding factors between groups and corrected for censoring and missing outcome assessment.Results14 111 patients were included in eight emulated trials: ASSESS (fingolimod vs glatiramer acetate), BEYOND (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), CONFIRM (dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs glatiramer acetate), OPERA (ocrelizumab vs interferon beta), REGARD (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), RIFUND-MS (rituximab vs DMF), TENERE (teriflunomide vs interferon beta) and TRANSFORMS (fingolimod vs interferon beta). Treatment effects estimated in emulated trials were concordant with RCT findings in seven of eight trials for relapse rate, and in all six trials assessing disability progression. Radiological outcomes were more challenging to replicate; concordance was achieved in three of five trials for new T2-lesions, and one of four trials for new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions.ConclusionThe combined use of a TTE methodology and high-quality registry data is a valid tool to evaluate treatment effectiveness in MS.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Miller A, Cohen JA, Karni A, et al.
2026
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Glatiramer Acetate
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
The mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate has not been fully elucidated; how…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
60 mg
[L41940]
…
Half-life
Protein binding
[A248875]
Volume of distribution
Metabolism
[A248875][L41940]
Elimination
[A248875]
Clearance
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
[L41940]
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 359 interactions
[L41940]
In vitro studies suggest that glatiramer acetate is non-mutagenic. No adverse effects were observed on reproductive or developmental parameters during in vivo studies.
[L41940]
Overdose information regarding glatiramer acetate is not readily available.
Patients experiencing an overdose are at an increased risk of severe adverse effects such as hepatic injury, lipoatrophy and skin necrosis at the injection site.
[L41940]
Symptomatic and supportive measures are recommended.
Several mechanisms of action have been proposed. For instance, glatiramer acetate binds strongly to several major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules on MBP-specific antigen-presenting cells, preventing MBP from stimulating these cells.[A3316][A248865] Glatiramer acetate also has the ability to shift the immune system from a pro-inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory pattern. It inhibits the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-12, IFNγ, TNF) released by T helper 1 (Th1) cells, and induces T helper 2 (Th2) suppressor cells that are able to cross the blood-brain barrier and produce anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-10, TGF-β).[A248875][A248865] It has also been suggested that glatiramer acetate induces the production of T-regulatory cells associated with the suppression of MS, such as CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+CD25+ cells.[A3315][A248865]
Some of the patients treated with glatiramer acetate (approximately 16%) have developed immediate post-injection reactions. Most of these cases are transient and do not require treatment, but there have been reports of patients requiring emergency medical care.[L41940] Patients taking glatiramer acetate may also experience chest pain, injection site side effects such as localized lipoatrophy and skin necrosis, and hepatic injury.[L41940] Since glatiramer acetate modifies immune response, it may interfere with immune function.[L41940]
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
[L41940]
In 7 out of 9 healthy volunteers that received 60 mg of glatiramer acetate subcutaneously, the Cmax ranged from 69 to 126 ng/mL, while the other two subjects showed significantly higher values (605 and 301 ng/mL).
[L41945]
AUC values showed great variability, ranging from 1,644 to 67,532 min⋅ng/mL.
[L41945]
The Tmax of glatiramer acetate went from 15 to 30 min, and in all subjects, glatiramer acetate levels returned to baseline after 30-60 min.
[A248870][L41945]
In healthy volunteers given 60 mg of glatiramer acetate subcutaneously, immunorecognizable fragments were no longer detected after 24 hours.
[A248875][L41945]
The systemic bioavailability of glatiramer acetate is considered to be minimal.
[A248870]
The pharmacokinetic parameters of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have not been determined.
[A248870]
[A248875]
[A248875][L41940]
[A248875]
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
ATC L03AX13
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Glatiramer
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72