Fremanezumab 225mg/1.5ml solution for injection pre-filled disposable devices

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is an established preventive therapy for chronic migraines; however, uncertainty remains regarding its comparative efficacy and safety. Thus, we aimed to summarize current evidence from high-quality systematic reviews of the therapeutic effects of BoNT-A in migraine management. An umbrella review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. High-quality systematic reviews with meta-analysis evaluating BoNT-A efficacy were identified through five databases up to August 2024. Primary outcomes included monthly headache frequency and severity. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the umbrella review checklist. Fourteen articles were included. Overall, quantitative evidence indicated favorable effects of BoNT-A compared with placebo for chronic migraines, across headache frequency, headache severity, and acute medication use, but less efficacy than topiramate and the CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) galcanezumab and fremanezumab. Though the adverse events were frequent, BoNT-A was generally well-tolerated. Comparative data suggested superior tolerability versus topiramate and a safety profile like CGRPmAbs. Although botulinum toxin type A is widely used as a preventive treatment for chronic migraines, the available evidence supports its efficacy at a moderate level. Further head-to-head and long-term analyses are needed to clarify its comparative role alongside newer biologic treatments.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Importance: Migraine and major depressive disorder are frequently comorbid; however, evidence evaluating the efficacy of preventive migraine therapy in patients with both diseases is limited. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in adults with migraine and comorbid major depressive disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: The UNITE study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial consisting of a 4-week screening period, 12-week double-blind period, and 12-week open-label extension (OLE), conducted between July 9, 2020, and August 31, 2022. The trial was conducted at 55 centers across 12 countries. Eligible patients were adults with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), history of major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria for 12 or more months before screening, and active symptoms of depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score of 10 or more) at screening. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive monthly fremanezumab (225 mg) or matched placebo. All patients in the OLE received quarterly fremanezumab (675 mg). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days during the 12-week double-blind period. Results: Of the 540 patients screened for the study, 353 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.3] years; 310 female [88%]; EM, 48%; CM, 52%) were eligible and randomized to receive fremanezumab (n = 175) or placebo (n = 178). Mean (SE) change from baseline in monthly migraine days during the 12-week double-blind period was -5.1 (0.50; 95% CI, -6.09 to -4.13) for fremanezumab and -2.9 (0.49; 95% CI, -3.89 to -1.96) for placebo (P <.001). Mean (SE) change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 Items score at week 8 was -6.0 (0.55; 95% CI, -7.10 to -4.95) for fremanezumab and -4.6 (0.54; 95% CI, -5.66 to -3.55) for placebo (least squares mean [SE] difference: -1.4 [0.61]; 95% CI, -2.61 to -0.22; P = .02). Adverse events were consistent with other fremanezumab trials. Results were maintained throughout the OLE. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with fremanezumab compared with placebo resulted in significant reductions in monthly migraine days and depressive symptoms. No new safety concerns were observed. To the authors' knowledge, this was the first placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, specifically designed to assess patients with migraine and comorbid depressive disorder, to demonstrate significant improvements in migraine and depressive symptoms with a single pharmacological intervention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04041284.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

INTRODUCTION: Long-term (1-year) fremanezumab treatment proved to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in individuals with migraine and < 2 medication clusters in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We aimed to assess real-world evidence (RWE), long-term effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of fremanezumab in people with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) with > 3 treatment failures and various comorbidities. METHODS: A 48-week, prospective, multicenter (n = 26), cohort study assessed fremanezumab's effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in consecutive adults with HFEM or CM with > 3 treatment failures. Primary endpoint was variation from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHD) in CM at weeks 45-48. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly analgesic medications, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores and ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responder rates. RESULTS: Of 533 participants who had received ≥ 1 fremanezumab dose, 130 were treated for ≥ 48 weeks and considered for effectiveness analysis. No participant missed any treatment dosage every other consecutive month during the 12-month period. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: fremanezumab significantly (p < 0.001) reduced both MMD (- 6.4) in HFEM and MHD (- 14.5) in CM. Secondary endpoints: a significant reduction (p < 0.001) was observed in monthly analgesic medications (HFEM - 6.0; CM -16.5), NRS (HFEM - 3.4; CM - 3.4), HIT-6 (HFEM - 16.9; CM - 17.9) and MIDAS score (HFEM - 50.4; CM - 76.6). The ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates to fremanezumab were 75.5%, 36.7%, and 2% in HFEM and 71.6%, 44.4%, and 3.7% in CM. Corresponding response rates were 60.5%, 37.2%, and 2.3% in individuals with psychiatric comorbidities, 74.2%, 50%, and 4.8% in CM with medication overuse, and 60.9%, 39.1%, and 4.3% in CM with medication overuse and psychiatric comorbidities. Mild and transient treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 7.8% of the participants. No subject discontinued the treatment for any reason. CONCLUSION: This RWE study documents that long-term fremanezumab treatment is highly effective and remarkably well tolerated in subjects with HFEM or CM with multiple (> 3) therapeutic failures, even in the presence of concomitant medication overuse, psychiatric comorbidities, or both. The effectiveness-to-tolerability ratio appears to be better in RWE than in RCTs.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Background/Objectives: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a primary pain condition that can develop in a limb after a trauma. Although the condition is rare, it may cause lifelong pain and disability. Evidence-based treatments are limited. Neurogenic inflammation induced by the release of neuropeptides, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is thought to play an important role in the pathophysiology of CRPS. Recently, drugs targeting CGRP have proven to be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of migraine, but their efficacy in other pain conditions, including CRPS, is unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the anti-CGRP antibody fremanezumab on pain in CRPS. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study, 60 adult patients with CRPS with a disease duration of 3–36 months are randomized to treatment for eight weeks with fremanezumab 225 mg or placebo administered subcutaneously at a 1:1 rate. The primary objective is to compare the change in pain intensity from baseline to the last week of treatment between fremanezumab and the placebo. Other objectives are to assess pain relief and differences in clinical signs between the groups and to examine if the effect can be predicted by CGRP biomarkers. Adverse events and blinding will also be assessed. Conclusions: If found effective, fremanezumab and other anti-CGRP antibodies may emerge as a mechanism-based treatment option for patients with CRPS, which could hopefully improve the overall care of patients with this devastating disease.

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: Fremanezumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, and gepants, small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists, are both approved for the treatment of migraine or its symptoms. This study assessed effectiveness, tolerability, and migraine-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) after the addition of fremanezumab for preventive migraine treatment in patients using gepants for acute treatment. METHODS: Data were extracted during a retrospective chart review from electronic medical records from the Dent Neurologic Institute. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, using gepants (rimegepant or ubrogepant), who initiated fremanezumab between January 1, 2020, and May 1, 2021 (index date: date of fremanezumab initiation) and continued concomitant use of gepants and fremanezumab for ≥ 1 month (post-index; between 7-9 months of follow-up). Outcomes included monthly migraine days (MMD), adverse events (AEs), reasons for discontinuation, and migraine-related HCRU. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients [female, 93%; mean (SD) age, 43.5 (13.5) years] met the inclusion criteria. All patients were diagnosed with chronic migraine. Patients had an average (SD) MMD of 15.8 (7.4) at the index date. Average (SE) change in MMD from index date to post-index was - 6.5 (1.0) days (p < 0.0001). Five patients (9.1%) experienced AEs post-index; no serious AEs (SAEs) were reported. The number of migraine-related medications used decreased from the index date to post-index by a mean of 0.6 for preventive medications (p = 0.070), and 0.8 for acute medications (p = 0.050). The number of outpatient office-based visits also decreased [mean (SD): 6 months pre-index, 5.8 (4.4) vs. 6 months post-index, 4.1 (4.0); p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: The addition of fremanezumab preventively to gepants for acute migraine treatment was effective, resulted in fewer outpatient office visits, and yielded no SAEs or AEs that were novel to these migraine medication classes.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC