Eptinezumab 100mg/1ml solution for infusion vials

Migraine is a leading cause of global disability, and conventional preventive therapies often suffer from poor tolerability and low adherence. Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs: erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab) represent a targeted therapeutic advance, but long-term adherence and safety remain under investigation. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science (2018-2024) for randomized controlled trials, real-world studies, and systematic reviews reporting adherence, tolerability, or discontinuation outcomes in adults with episodic or chronic migraine. Eleven studies (n > 50,000) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled 12-month adherence was approximately 55% (vs. ~35% for oral preventives), while discontinuation due to adverse events ranged from 5.9%-20%, most commonly constipation and injection-site reactions (relative risk, 1.32-1.55); serious adverse events were rare (<5%). Responder rates (≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days) improved from 44% at three months to 64% at 12 months, with network meta-analyses suggesting greater efficacy compared with topiramate and OnabotulinumtoxinA, though direct head-to-head RCTs remain lacking. Overall, anti-CGRP mAbs demonstrate favorable adherence, sustained tolerability, and comparative advantages over conventional therapies, but further research is needed to assess long-term safety beyond 12 months, cost-effectiveness, and use in special populations such as pregnancy.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7-100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning "missing information" arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveCalcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants), have transformed migraine treatment. Although clinical trials established their efficacy and initial safety, post-marketing surveillance is essential for understanding their real-world safety profile in a broader population. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review and synthesize findings from published pharmacovigilance studies that analyze potential safety signals for CGRP inhibitors using major international databases, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the World Health Organization's (WHO's) VigiBase, and EudraVigilance, in order to establish a comprehensive real-world safety profile to guide clinical practice.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in major electronic databases for studies published up to September 2025. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent researchers. We included original research articles analyzing FAERS, VigiBase, or EudraVigilance for AEs associated with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab, rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, or zavegepant. Data on key signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) and quantitative measures of disproportionality were extracted and synthesized thematically.ResultsThe search identified 30 eligible studies. For mAbs, consistent SDRs included injection site reactions, alopecia (e.g., fremanezumab reporting odds ratio (ROR) ranging from 2.73 to 6.9), constipation (primarily for erenumab, RORs ranging from 4.92 to 17.94), and a range of cardiovascular events. For gepants, common SDRs included nausea and fatigue or somnolence, with highly specific SDRs for severe constipation for atogepant (ROR025 = 19.99) and dysgeusia for zavegepant (ROR025 = 212.07), linked to its nasal administration. A critical divergence was observed for rare but serious cerebrovascular events: SDRs for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS [erenumab ROR 9.43, 95% confidence interval {CI} 4.5-19.8]) and cervical artery dissection (CeAD [galcanezumab ROR 14.0, 95% CI 6.22-31.4]) were associated with certain mAbs. Conversely, no such SDRs have been detected for gepants to date, although this distinction requires confirmation as real-world exposure increases. However, a class-level SDR for cerebrovascular diseases as a whole was identified for CGRP inhibitors as a group (ROR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33). Also notable were shared SDRs for Raynaud's phenomenon and alopecia across both subclasses. Finally, concerning safety in pregnancy, the data are complex: while comprehensive class-level analyses did not identify a disproportionality signal compared to triptans, some analyses of individual drugs have identified reporting patterns that warrant cautious interpretation, underscoring the need for further dedicated pharmacovigilance studies to fully clarify the safety profile in this population.ConclusionsThis systematic review confirms that CGRP inhibitors have a manageable yet complex safety profile. It distinguishes rare, serious cerebrovascular events (RCVS, CeAD) associated with some mAbs but not with gepants, as well as shared adverse effects such as Raynaud's phenomenon and alopecia. Significant heterogeneity in safety profiles-from erenumab's pronounced constipation SDR to zavegepant's unique dysgeusia-challenges the view of CGRP inhibitors as a monolithic category. These findings provide a clear rationale for personalized risk assessment, enabling clinicians to tailor treatment to individual patient profiles.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundCluster headache (CH) is one of the most severe types of pain, yet pharmacological treatment options are limited. In the present study, we aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the prevention of episodic cluster headache (eCH) and chronic (cCH) cluster headache.MethodsWe searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science. Included were all clinical trials, case series and single case reports that reported the effects of anti-CGRP treatment on CH. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were used for abstracting data. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized trials and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized studies. The collected data from all studies were summarized using descriptive statistics. Data from randomized trials were additionally reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects meta-analysis. Given the variability in study design and the diverse formats of reported outcome data, we primarily focused on the ≥ 50% responder rate reported closest to the 4-week point following drug administration, which was consistently reported in almost all studies.ResultsFrom 734 identified records, 25 articles were included, comprising a total of 1587 patients. Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials suggests that anti-CGRP treatment had a statistically significant positive effect in eCH (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07-2.55, p = 0.02), with galcanezumab 300 mg and eptinezumab 400 mg being more effective than placebo in achieving a ≥ 50% responder rate in eCH attacks at the 4-week mark following administration. Simultaneously, a significant mean reduction in weekly attack frequency at week 4 was observed only for galcanezumab 300 mg (p = 0.04). Despite findings from some non-randomized trials, the meta-analysis showed no statistically significant effect in cCH (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.78-1.48, p = 0.68).ConclusionsOur analysis revealed a beneficial effect of anti-CGRP mAbs in eCH, while no effect was observed in cCH. Despite these positive findings, the favourable results with galcanezumab and eptinezumab in eCH should be interpreted with caution due to discrepancies in the outcome data and the challenges associated with selecting endpoints in CH trials. The discrepancy between real-world data and findings from controlled trials further highlights the need for continued discussions among experts to develop more adequate methods for conducting CH trials.Trial RegistrationPROSPERO ID: CRD420250609351.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Chronic migraine is one of the debilitating neurological conditions affecting the lives of several patients. This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the pharmacological treatment of chronic migraine. We conducted this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The literature search encompassed extensive databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The analysis included studies published from 2014 to 2024, and the quality of the included studies was evaluated using the appropriate tools according to the study design. The synthesis and data analysis included a summary of study characteristics, interventions, outcomes measured, and main study results/conclusions. Sample sizes in the included studies ranged from 1,072 to 2,436 participants. The most common pharmacological treatments used for chronic migraine were eptinezumab, onabotulinumtoxinA, and galcanezumab, which emerged from 14 quality randomized controlled trials. Studies observed significant improvements across various metrics, including headache frequency, severity, quality of life measures, and patient-reported outcomes. The Headache Impact Test-6 score, monthly migraine headache days, Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life score, and Migraine Disability Assessment score were particularly useful in quantifying the treatment's effectiveness. This systematic review concludes the effectiveness and safety of newer treatments such as eptinezumab, galcanezumab, and onabotulinumtoxinA in managing chronic migraine, illustrating notable improvements in both clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients.

Abstract licence: CC BY