Dapagliflozin 5mg / Metformin 850mg tablets

BackgroundTriple oral therapy combining metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor has been proposed as a synergistic approach to intensify glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy compared to dual therapy (metformin plus either sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor).MethodsFollowing preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2026. Studies included randomized controlled trials comparing triple versus dual therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Outcomes included hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, body weight, achievement of HbA1c ResultsEight studies encompassing 2606 participants were included. Findings indicate triple therapy significantly reduced HbA1c levels compared to dual therapy, with a SMD of - 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92 to -0.16; P = .005). Triple therapy resulted in greater reduction in fasting plasma glucose, with an SMD of -0.30 (95% CI: -0.62 to 0.01; P = .06). Patients on triple therapy were more likely to achieve HbA1c levels below 7% (RR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.55-2.63; P ConclusionTriple therapy offers superior glycemic control over dual therapy without major safety trade-offs, though tolerability may affect long-term adherence.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

AimsTo compare up-to-date efficacy and safety data of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) versus other metformin-containing oral dual-therapies (ODTs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe updated a 2016 systematic literature review (SLR), searching MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, congress abstracts and SLR/meta-analysis (MA) bibliographies to identify randomised controlled trials. Two independent reviewers determined eligible studies, which were extracted and assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. MA was conducted using random-effects pairwise models.ResultsWe included 36 publications (23 unique studies). Mean differences (MD) indicated comparable change in HbA1c from baseline at Weeks 24 and 52 between SGLT-2i plus metformin and other metformin-containing ODTs. Patients on SGLT-2i plus metformin showed a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.84) and significantly greater weight reduction (MD: -2.59; 95% CI: -4.42, -0.77), but an elevated risk of genital infection (RR: 5.08; 95% CI: 3.49, 7.38) at Week 52 compared with other ODTs. Other safety outcomes (e.g., urinary tract infections) were comparable between SGLT-2i plus metformin and other ODTs.ConclusionCompared with other ODTs, SGLT-2i plus metformin exhibited overall comparable efficacy and safety, with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and greater weight reduction at Week 52.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundPrediabetes refers to the transitional stage from normal glucose metabolism to diabetes. The International Diabetes Federation guidelines reported that, as of 2024, approximately 1.12 billion people globally were in the prediabetes stage. Without intervention, individuals with prediabetes are highly likely to progress to type 2 diabetes mellitus. It can be seen that prediabetes is posing a threat to human health and life and leads to a significant global public health concern.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched before March 29, 2025. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolled adults with prediabetes, compared the efficacy and safety of placebo and anti-prediabetic drugs (e.g., metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and thiazolidinedione) with a follow-up duration of at least 12 weeks. Bayesian network meta-analysis was employed in statistical analysis.ResultsFifty-five eligible RCTs involving 37 interventions with 16,610 participants were included in this study. Compared with placebo, most anti-prediabetic drugs significantly reduced levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (mean difference (MD), - 0.94 ~ - 0.27%), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD, - 26.42 ~ - 0.15 mg/dL), weight loss (WL) (MD, - 13.59 ~ - 5.99 kg) and body mass index (BMI) (MD, - 4.50 ~ - 0.08 kg/m2). Specifically, 2.4 mg of semaglutide SC demonstrated the most optimal efficacy in WL (MD - 13.59 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 17.30 to - 9.91) and favorable efficacy in lowering HbA1c (MD - 0.39%; 95% CI - 0.55 to - 0.25); 15 mg of tirzepatide showed significant efficacy in lowering FPG (MD - 9.58 mg/dL; 95% CI - 12.00 to - 7.15), and potent efficacy in lowering BMI. Thirty milligrams of pioglitazone showed excellent efficacy in lowering lipid and FPG. Among the interventions, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs), while 100 mg of sitagliptin demonstrated higher incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs).ConclusionsAmong all the included interventions, GLP-1RAs, GIP/GLP-1RAs, and TZDs demonstrated favorable anti-prediabetic efficacy and acceptable safety. 2.4 mg of semaglutide SC and 15 mg of tirzepatide were the best option among the included interventions considering favorable glucose and BMI control.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42025636991.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundBexagliflozin exerts definite efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, whether this novel sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor is superior to other SGLT2 inhibitors remains to be elucidated. We therefore performed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare bexagliflozin with other SGLT2 inhibitors and establish an efficacy hierarchy in T2DM management.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to January 2026. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane tool, evidence certainty was evaluated using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach, and intervention ranking was performed using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.ResultsThis NMA included 48 studies with 26,838 patients. Bexagliflozin significantly reduced HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared with placebo. For HbA1c reduction, canagliflozin (300 mg, 100 mg) and empagliflozin 25 mg were more effective than bexagliflozin, while bexagliflozin was comparable to other SGLT2 inhibitors. For FPG reduction, canagliflozin 300 mg and empagliflozin 25 mg showed slightly greater effects than bexagliflozin, with no significant differences between bexagliflozin and other comparators. Bexagliflozin was superior to dapagliflozin 5 mg but slightly inferior to canagliflozin 300 mg for weight loss, while showing comparable efficacy to other SGLT2 inhibitors. It achieved similar SBP and DBP reduction to other SGLT2 inhibitors, with a significantly greater DBP-lowering effect than empagliflozin 10 mg. Bexagliflozin had a lower incidence of urinary tract infection than dapagliflozin (5 mg, 10 mg), with comparable safety to other agents and placebo. Canagliflozin 300 mg showed the best efficacy for HbA1c, FPG and weight control.ConclusionBexagliflozin demonstrates comparable efficacy to most SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM patients, with a relatively prominent benefit in body weight reduction and a similar safety profile. Canagliflozin 300 mg provides more effective glycemic and weight control.

Abstract licence: CC BY