Empagliflozin 10mg / Linagliptin 5mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Empagliflozin + Linagliptin
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Empagliflozin + Linagliptin on the MHRA register
Glyxambi 10mg/5mg tablets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 13 · Randomised trials: 28 · 2009–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Odd Johansen, Dietmar Neubacher, Maximilian von Eynatten, et al.
Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2012
Baptist Gallwitz, Julio Rosenstock, Thomas Rauch, et al.
The Lancet, 2012
S. Del Prato, A. H. Barnett, H. Huisman, et al.
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2011
Lin R, Hsu CL, Shih MC, et al.
2026
- Diabetic Nephropathies
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Hypoglycemic Agents
AimsTo investigate the renal outcomes of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose transport protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with chronic renal disease (CKD).Materials and methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through July 2025 for randomized controlled trials with ≥24 weeks of follow-up in patients with T2DM and CKD. Outcomes included composite renal outcome, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). A network meta-analysis was conducted, and the certainty of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation used to evaluate evidence certainty (GRADE).ResultsTwenty RCTs enrolling 80,670 participants were included. Compared with placebo, several agents significantly reduced composite renal outcomes, with dapagliflozin 10 mg showing the greatest efficacy (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.72; high-certainty evidence), followed by canagliflozin, empagliflozin, efpeglenatide, sotagliflozin 400 mg, semaglutide, and dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Canagliflozin 100-300 mg significantly reduced UACR, whereas dapagliflozin had no effect. None of the novel antidiabetic agents significantly altered eGFR. Certainty of evidence ranged from high for placebo-controlled comparisons to low or very low for indirect estimates.ConclusionsIn patients with T2DM and CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors provide the most consistent renal protection, while GLP-1 receptor agonists offer additional but variable benefits. Dapagliflozin showed the greatest efficacy, and canagliflozin most strongly reduced albuminuria, highlighting meaningful heterogeneity across agents. DPP-4 inhibitors conferred no renal benefit. Overall, evidence from placebo-controlled trials was robust, whereas certainty was lower for indirect estimates, highlighting the need for drug-specific evaluation in clinical practice.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Joongpan W, Boonmuen N, Sinchai P, et al.
2026
- Muscle, Skeletal
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are growing global health concerns, particularly in older adults who are at higher risk of sarcopenia. While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors show promise for glycemic control and weight loss, their effects on muscle health remain unclear. We examined the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on body weight, fat mass, and muscle mass in T2DM patients. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three reviewers screened the studies, and two extracted data and assessed their quality. R software was used to evaluate heterogeneity via Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Eight RCTs (n = 541) were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced body weight (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.85, p 2 = 0%) and fat mass (SMD = -0.53, p 2 = 51.1%). A small reduction in muscle mass was observed (SMD = -0.35, p 2 = 22.9%), though substantially smaller than fat loss. Subgroup analysis confirmed that fat mass was reduced with dapagliflozin/ipragliflozin (SMD = -0.67, p 2 = 26.4%) and empagliflozin (SMD = -0.53, p 2 = 66.4%). SGLT2 inhibitors effectively reduce body weight primarily through fat loss in older adults. Although muscle mass declined modestly, the predominance of fat loss suggests weight reduction occurs through favorable metabolic changes. Given the slight muscle mass changes and study heterogeneity, careful monitoring in older adults is warranted, and further studies in diverse populations are needed.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Harzalina Zilfi Amly, Evi Ananta Ulisa Sitepu, Igna Laurensus Sitorus
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 2025
Saleem T, Rasool MF, Saeed H, et al.
2026
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Benzhydryl Compounds
- Glucosides
L. M. Laffel, T. Danne, G. Klingensmith, et al.
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2023
Arjun Baidya, A. Mitra, S. Ray, et al.
Medical Research Journal, 2025
N. Katsiki, R. Ofori-Asenso, E. Ferrannini, et al.
Diabetes, 2020
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.