Connaught strain Bacillus of Calmette-Guerin 81mg powder for reconstitution for instillation vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Connaught strain Bacillus of Calmette-Guerin on the MHRA register
ImmuCyst 81mg powder for reconstitution for instillation vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
1.8 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 32 · Randomised trials: 10 · 1972–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
J. Martinez-Pineiro, L. Martínez-Piñeiro, E. Solsona, et al.
The Journal of urology, 2005
Boehm BE, Cornell JE, Wang H, et al.
2017
- Mycobacterium bovis
- BCG Vaccine
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
Tempo J, Bolton D, O'Callaghan M
2023
- Carcinoma in Situ
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
- Urology
The South West Oncology Group's 2000 randomised-control trial investigated the addition of maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (NMIUC) treatment. The results were published when the efficacy of BCG immunotherapy maintenance was unclear.Randomisation produced two arms, each containing 192 patients assessed to be at high risk of recurrence following induction BCG therapy for NMIUC. The treatment arm went on to receive three successive weekly intravesical and percutaneous BCG administrations at three months, six months and then six monthly for three years from the start of induction therapy.Recurrence free-survival (RFS), was higher in the maintenance arm with 41% (95%CI 35-49) RFS at five years in the control arm and 60% RFS (53-67 95% CI) in the maintenance arm (p < 0.0001). Only 16% of patients in the treatment arm received all of the scheduled maintenance courses of BCG.The study's seminal results correlate with contemporary systematic review and have guided international guidelines.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Oh C, Bourlotos G, O'Callaghan M, et al.
2025
- BCG Vaccine
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
BackgroundMost patients with localized bladder cancer are initially managed with endoscopic resection. For high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is the gold standard adjuvant treatment. However, 30%-40% of patients fail BCG treatment with lack of response or disease relapse. An understudied area of treatment failure is BCG intolerance, where patients drop out of treatment due to adverse effects.ObjectivesTo examine the incidence and underlying reasons for BCG intolerance among adult patients with NMIBC.MethodsWe conducted a search on Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies from January 1, 1974 to January 10, 2023, retrieving 3340 articles. Two authors independently conducted screening and data extraction with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria include English-language studies reporting dropout rates and reasons for discontinuation of BCG therapy in NMIBC patients.ResultsBCG dropout rates reported among the 28 included studies varied widely from 0% to 52% (estimated summary proportion 12.8%, 95% CI 9%-17%). There was significant heterogeneity in study design. Subgroup analyses show a dose-dependent effect on dropout rates (3.3% vs. 20%, X2 = 83.6, p = -16). Dropout rates vary with BCG strains: the Connaught strain had the highest at 21.1%, while the Pasteur strain had 2%. Clinical outcomes for BCG intolerance are not widely reported.ConclusionsDropout rates due to BCG intolerance average 12.8%. As cessation of treatment could lead to an increased risk in progression or recurrence of disease, strategies to mitigate BCG intolerance would be valuable.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Jain H, Odat RM, Hussein AM, et al.
2024
IntroductionThe Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine has a beneficial "off-target" effect that offers heterologous protection against respiratory tract infections by inducing trained immunity. The need for producing antigen-specific COVID-19 vaccines leads to delays in vaccine administration. Current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report conflicting data on BCG's efficacy in COVID-19 infection.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using major bibliographic databases to identify RCTs evaluating the outcomes of BCG re-vaccination in COVID-19. For dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Statistical significance was set at P less than 0.05.ResultsThirteen RCTs with 13 939 participants (7004 in the BCG re-vaccination group and 6935 in the placebo group) were included. BCG re-vaccination did not lead to a statistically significant difference in the incidence of COVID-19 infection [OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.19; P=0.56], COVID-19-related hospitalizations [OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.38, 1.72; P=0.58), ICU admissions [OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.13, 1.46; P=0.18], or mortality [OR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.15, 3.04; P=0.60]. For safety outcomes, BCG re-vaccination led to a significant increase in the local injection site complications [OR: 99.79; 95% CI: 31.04, 320.80; PP=0.33].ConclusionsBCG re-vaccination does not decrease the incidence of COVID-19 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalizations, ICU admissions, COVID-19-related mortality, and serious adverse events; however, it leads to a rise in local injection site complications. Caution should be exercised when overstating BCG's efficacy in COVID-19 prevention.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Azuri W, Jaunarena JH, Camean JJ, et al.
2023
Inauen J, LaBroome S, Maldari A, et al.
2025
Garras Y, Alsaadi D, Kinnear N, et al.
2026
Mukherjee N, Wheeler KM, Svatek RS
2019
- BCG Vaccine
- Administration, Intravesical
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.