Choriogonadotropin alfa 250micrograms/0.5ml solution for injection pre-filled syringes
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Minimal controls; includes benzodiazepines and anabolic steroids
Legal requirements and restrictions
Anabolic steroids and related substances. Possession for personal use is not an offence, but supply is controlled.
Legal requirements
- Prescriptions valid for 28 days
- No controlled drugs register required
- No safe custody requirements
- Import/export restrictions apply
Other medicines in this category
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Choriogonadotropin alfa
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Choriogonadotropin alfa on the MHRA register
Ovitrelle 250micrograms/0.5ml solution for injection pre-filled syringes
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
250 microgram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 16 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 3 · Randomised trials: 1 · 1990–2025
Showing all 16 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Doroftei B, Ilie OD, Dabuleanu AM, et al.
2024
- Algorithms
- Ovulation Induction
- Pregnancy Outcome
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in an individualized algorithm-based manner is inferior to recombinant human-follicle stimulating's follitropin alfa or follitropin beta conventional dosing regarding a series of established primary endpoints. METHODS: We conducted a registered systematic review (CRD42024512792) on PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science™, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our search was designed to cover all relevant literature, particularly randomized controlled trials. We critically and comparatively analyzed the outcomes for each primary endpoint based on the intervention, reflected by the positive βhCG test, clinical pregnancy, vital pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, live birth at 4 weeks, and multiple pregnancies. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials were included in the quality assessment as priority manuscripts, revealing an 83.3% low risk of bias. Follitropin delta led to non-significant differences in each parameter of interest from positive βhCG test (691; 53.44% vs. 602; 46.55%), ongoing pregnancies (603; 53.79% vs. 518; 46.20%), clinical and vital pregnancies (1,073; 52.80% vs. 959; 47.19%), to live birth and at 4 weeks (595; 54.14% vs. 504; 45.85%) with only 2 losses, and even multiple pregnancies (8; 66.66% vs. 4; 33.33%). However, follitropin delta was well-tolerated among hypo- and hyper-responders without significant risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or preventive interventions in contrast with follitropin alfa or follitropin beta. CONCLUSION: The personalized individualized-based algorithm dosing with follitropin delta is non-inferior to conventional follitropin alfa or follitropin beta. It is as effective in promoting a similar response in women without significant comparable adverse effects.
Abstract licence: CC BY
J. M. Kirkwood, M. H. Strawderman, M. Ernstoff, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023
Luca Richeldi, C. Schiffman, Jürgen Behr, et al.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2024
Abstract Rationale A phase II trial reported clinical benefit over 28 weeks in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who received zinpentraxin alfa. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of zinpentraxin alfa in patients with IPF in a phase III trial. Methods This 52-week phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pivotal trial was conducted at 275 sites in 29 countries. Patients with IPF were randomized 1:1 to intravenous placebo or zinpentraxin alfa 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in FVC. Secondary endpoints included absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted FVC and 6-minute walk distance. Safety was monitored via adverse events. Post hoc analysis of the phase II and phase III data explored changes in FVC and their impact on the efficacy results. Measurements and Main Results Of 664 randomized patients, 333 were assigned to placebo and 331 to zinpentraxin alfa. Four of the 664 randomized patients were never administered study drug. The trial was terminated early after a prespecified futility analysis that demonstrated no treatment benefit of zinpentraxin alfa over placebo. In the final analysis, absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in FVC was similar between placebo and zinpentraxin alfa (−214.89 ml and −235.72 ml; P = 0.5420); there were no apparent treatment effects on secondary endpoints. Overall, 72.3% and 74.6% of patients receiving placebo and zinpentraxin alfa, respectively, experienced one or more adverse events. Post hoc analysis revealed that extreme FVC decline in two placebo-treated patients resulted in the clinical benefit of zinpentraxin alfa reported by phase II. Conclusions Zinpentraxin alfa treatment did not benefit patients with IPF over placebo. Learnings from this program may help improve decision making around trials in IPF. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04552899).
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Dominique P. Germain, Aleš Linhart
Frontiers in Genetics, 2024
Fabry disease, a rare X-linked genetic disorder, results from pathogenic variants in GLA , leading to deficient lysosomal α-galactosidase A enzyme activity and multi-organ manifestations. Since 2001, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), using agalsidase alfa or agalsidase beta, has been the mainstay treatment, albeit with limitations such as rapid clearance and immunogenicity. Pegunigalsidase alfa, a novel PEGylated recombinant alpha-galactosidase, offers promise as an alternative. Produced in plant cells, pegunigalsidase alfa exhibits enhanced stability, prolonged half-life, and reduced immunogenicity due to pegylation. A phase 1/2 clinical trial demonstrated Gb3 clearance from renal capillary endothelial cells and its 48-month extension study revealed notable outcomes in renal function preservation. Three phase 3 clinical trials (BRIDGE, BRIGHT, and BALANCE) have shown favorable efficacy and safety profile, although caution is warranted in interpreting the results of BRIDGE and BRIGHT which lacked control groups. In BALANCE, the pivotal phase 3 trial comparing pegunigalsidase alfa with agalsidase beta, an intention-to-treat analysis of the eGFR decline over 2 years showed that the intergroup difference [95%confidence interval] in the median slope was −0.36 mL/min/1.73 m 2 /year [−2.44; 1.73]. The confidence interval had a lower limit above the prespecified value of −3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 /year and included zero. Despite challenges such as occasional hypersensitivity reactions and immune-complex-mediated glomerulonephritis, pegunigalsidase alfa approval by the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration represents a significant addition to Fabry disease therapeutic landscape providing an option for patients in whom enzyme replacement therapy with current formulations is poorly tolerated or poorly effective.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Y B Xie, H Wang, D L Segaloff
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1990
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Binding Sites
- Cell Line
The lutropin-choriogonadotropin (LH/CG) receptor is a cell surface receptor comprised of two domains of roughly equivalent size. The amino-terminal half of the receptor is relatively hydrophilic and is located extracellularly, whereas the carboxyl-terminal half of the receptor shares amino acid homology with other receptors that couple to G proteins and is similarly thought to span the plasma membrane seven times, ending with a relatively short carboxyl-terminal tail. In order to test the role of the extracellular domain in binding hormone, we constructed a mutated rat luteal LH/CG receptor cDNA (termed pCLHR-D2), which encodes for only the extracellular domain, and used it to transiently transfect human kidney 293 cells. Here we report that the expressed extracellular domain of the LH/CG receptor is capable of binding human CG with a high affinity, comparable with that of the full-length receptor. Thus, not only is the extracellular domain of the glycoprotein hormone receptors involved in binding hormone, but it alone is capable of conferring high affinity binding. Unexpectedly, it was also found that this truncated receptor is not secreted into the culture media but remains trapped within the cells.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Ross C. Anderson, C. Newton, R. Millar
Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2019
The follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) has been targeted therapeutically for decades, due to its pivotal role in reproduction. To date, only purified and recombinant/biosimilar FSH have been used to target FSHR in assisted reproduction, with the exception of corifollitropin alfa; a modified gonadotropin in which the FSH beta subunit is joined to the C-terminal peptide of the human choriogonadotropin beta subunit, to extend serum half-life. Assisted reproduction protocols usually entail the trauma of multiple painful injections of FSH to initiate and promote folliculogenesis, which has prompted the development of a number of orally-available low molecular weight (LMW) chemical scaffolds targeting the FSHR. Furthermore, the recently documented roles of FSHR in diverse extragonadal tissues and conditions, such as cancer, fat metabolism and bone density regulation, has highlighted the potential utility of LMW modulators of FSHR activity. Despite these chemical scaffolds encompassing a spectrum of in vitro and in vivo activities and pharmacological profiles, none have yet reached the clinic. In this review we discuss the major chemical classes of LMW molecules targeting the FSHR, and document their activity profiles and current status of development, in addition to discussing potential clinical applications.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Y. Dargaud, A. Leuci, A. R. Ruiz, et al.
Haematologica, 2024
- Factor VIII
- Hemophilia A
- Clinical Trials as Topic
Efanesoctocog alfa (Altuviiio,TM Sanofi-SOBI) is a B domain-deleted single-chain Factor VIII (FVIII) connected to D'D3 domain of von Willebrand Factor (vWF). Its ingenious design allows efanesoctocog alfa to operate independently of endogenous vWF and results in an outstanding 3-4 times longer half-life compared to standard and extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products. The prolonged half-life ensures sustained high levels of factor activity, maintaining normal to near-normal ranges for the majority of the week, facilitating the convenience of once-weekly administration. Efanesoctocog alfa received regulatory approval in 2023 for application in both adults and children with inherited hemophilia A in the United States and Japan. Its sanctioned use encompasses both prophylaxis and 'on demand' treatment for bleeding episodes. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of Altuviiio. TM This comprehensive review focuses on the immunological profile of efanesoctocog alfa, a highly sophisticated new class of EHL FVIII molecule. The integration of the vWF D'D3 domain, XTEN polypeptides, and potential regulatory T-cell epitopes within various segments of efanesoctocog alfa collectively serves as a mitigating factor against the development of a neutralizing T-cell-mediated immune response. We hypothesize that such distinctive attribute may significantly reduce the risk of neutralizing antibodies, particularly in previously untreated patients. The discussion extends beyond regulatory approval to encompass the preclinical and clinical development of efanesoctocog alfa, including considerations for laboratory monitoring. The review also highlights areas that warrant further investigation to deepen our understanding of this groundbreaking therapeutic agent.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
L. Malec, F. Peyvandi, Anthony K C Chan, et al.
The New England journal of medicine, 2024
- Factor VIII
- Hemophilia A
- Hemorrhage
Kobanawa M, Iwami N, Hanaoka M, et al.
2024
Aim: This study compared the cost-effectiveness of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormones (rFSH) formulations, Follitropin Delta and Follitropin Alfa, in controlled ovarian stimulation using cumulative live birth rates as an efficacy indicator. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted across five clinics in Japan from April 2022 to December 2023, involving 446 first assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles (200 with Follitropin Delta and 246 with Follitropin Alfa) were treated with rFSH monotherapy using either Follitropin Delta or Follitropin Alfa. We compared clinical outcomes such as cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates and analyzed cost-effectiveness using the cumulative live birth rates as the efficacy indicator and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: The Follitropin Delta group had a significantly lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (15.90% vs. 27.00%, P = 0.045) and higher cumulative pregnancy rates than the Follitropin Alfa group (87.30% vs. 76.20 %; P = 0.03) after propensity score matching (PSM). Although cumulative live birth rates showed no significant differences (85.70% vs. 76.20%, P = 0.08) and Follitropin Delta demonstrated higher cost than Follitropin AlfaFollitropin Alfa (832,036 yen and 826,936 yen), ICER indicated low costs per percentage of live births (538.58 yen/%: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 275.34-12,568.69 yen). Conclusions: Using Follitropin Delta for controlled ovarian stimulation in ART may be more cost-effective than Follitropin Alfa under Japan’s Health Care Insurance System, offering higher cumulative live birth rates and minimal additional costs.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Evelyn Cottell, Damien Michalet, Monica Lispi, et al.
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2024
- Chorionic Gonadotropin
- Luteinizing Hormone
- Injections
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
6 hours
Mechanism
Choriogonadotropin alfa binds to the Follicle stimulating hormone receptor which…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
2 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
40%
Half-life
6 hours
Volume of distribution
1.0 L
Elimination
Clearance
0.04 L/h
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:11847099 PMID:24058690 PMID:24692546
Through cAMP production activates the downstream PI3K-AKT and ERK1/ERK2 signaling pathways PMID:24058690
PMID:11847099
The activity of this receptor is mediated by G proteins which activate adenylate cyclase PMID:11847099
ATC G03GA08
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Choriogonadotropin alfa
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
12389
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
14798
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:3969
GenAtlas
FSHR
GeneCards
FSHR
GenBank Gene Database
M65085
GenBank Protein Database
182771
Guide to Pharmacology
253
UniProt Accession
FSHR_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:6585
GenAtlas
LHCGR
GeneCards
LHCGR
GenBank Gene Database
M73746
GenBank Protein Database
903746
Guide to Pharmacology
254
UniProt Accession
LSHR_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q407172), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.