Ceftolozane 1g / Tazobactam 500mg powder for solution for infusion vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Ceftolozane + Tazobactam on the MHRA register
Zerbaxa 1g/0.5g powder for concentrate for solution for infusion vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(5)
Antimicrobial prescribing: ceftolozane with tazobactam for treating hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (ES22)
Complicated urinary tract infections: ceftolozane/tazobactam (ESNM74)
Complicated intra-abdominal infections: ceftolozane/tazobactam (ESNM75)
Pyelonephritis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG111)
Cefiderocol for treating severe drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections (AMR2)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 20 · Randomised trials: 12 · 2013–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Marin H. Kollef, Martin Nováček, Ülo Kivistik, et al.
The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2019
- Meropenem
- Tazobactam
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
Joseph S. Solomkin, Ellie Hershberger, Benjamin Miller, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2015
- Tazobactam
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Bacterial Infections
Florian Wagenlehner, Obiamiwe Umeh, Judith N. Steenbergen, et al.
The Lancet, 2015
- Tazobactam
- Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary
- Cephalosporins
David van Duin, Robert A. Bonomo
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2016
- Ceftazidime
- Cephalosporins
- Azabicyclo Compounds
Yulong Chi, Juan Xu, N. Bai, et al.
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2023
- Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
- Pseudomonas Infections
- Cephalosporins
Marzieh Rahim khorasani, S. Rostami, Arash Bakhshi, et al.
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 2023
Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Maria Mazzitelli, Enrico Maria Trecarichi, et al.
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2020
- Tazobactam
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Cephalosporins
Pimenta-de-Souza P, Ramos-Silva A, Sandes V, et al.
2026
- Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
- Cephalosporins
- Ceftazidime
BackgroundThe growing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli poses major challenges to the management of severe paediatric infections. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) are newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with established efficacy in adults.ObjectiveTo synthesize current evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of CZA and C/T in hospitalized children with severe infections.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map (PROSPERO CRD420251025715). Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, LILACS, SciELO, and Web of Science. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case series, and case reports evaluating CZA or C/T for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), pneumonia, or bacteraemia in patients aged 0-18 y. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality; secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological cure and adverse events.ResultsNineteen studies (4 RCTs, 9 case series, 6 case reports) involving 472 patients were included. Sixteen studies evaluated CZA and three evaluated C/T. All RCTs were phase II, industry-sponsored, and excluded critically ill children and carbapenem-resistant infections. According to the updated RoB 2 assessment, two trials had overall low risk of bias, and two presented some concerns, mainly related to missing outcome data. No deaths occurred in RCTs, whereas observational studies reported 8% mortality. Clinical and microbiological cure exceeded 80% across study designs. Adverse events were generally infrequent; neonatal events clustered in case series, but evidence was insufficient for statistical comparison across age groups. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate (cUTI with susceptible pathogens) to very low (pneumonia and resistant infections).ConclusionsCZA and C/T appear promising for paediatric cUTI and complicated intra-abdominal infections, but the evidence base remains narrow and largely dependent on small, industry-funded trials. Independent RCTs including critically ill children and resistant infections are urgently needed.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Martin-Loeches I, Shields R, Yücel E, et al.
2026
Gatti M, De Paola R, Giorgi B, et al.
2026
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.