Belimumab 120mg powder for solution for infusion vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Belimumab
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Belimumab
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Belimumab on the MHRA register
Benlysta 120mg powder for concentrate for solution for infusion vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
25 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(3)
Belimumab for treating active autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (TA752)
Belimumab for treating lupus nephritis (terminated appraisal) (TA806)
Obinutuzumab with mycophenolate mofetil for treating lupus nephritis (TA1131)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 30 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 3 · Randomised trials: 3 · 2020–2025
Showing all 30 studies, sorted by most relevant.
R. Furie, B. Rovin, F. Houssiau, et al.
The New England journal of medicine, 2020
- Azathioprine
- Creatinine
- Cyclophosphamide
Yu Zhao, G. Chi, Shujun Xia, et al.
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2025
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Infections
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
E. Arends, M. Zlei, C. Tipton, et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024
- Memory B Cells
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- B-Lymphocytes
OBJECTIVES: Autoreactive memory B cells (MBCs) contribute to chronic and progressive courses in autoimmune diseases like SLE. The efficacy of belimumab (BEL), the first approved biologic treatment for SLE and LN, is generally attributed to depletion of activated naïve B cells and inhibition of B-cell activation. BEL's effect on MBCs is currently unexplained. We performed an in-depth cellular and transcriptomic analysis of BEL's impact on the blood MBC compartment in patients with SLE. METHODS: A retrospective meta-analysis was conducted, pooling flow cytometry data from four randomized trials involving 1245 patients with SLE treated with intravenous BEL or placebo. Then, extensive MBC phenotyping was performed using high-sensitivity flow cytometry in patients with mild/moderate SLE and severe SLE/LN treated with subcutaneous BEL. Finally, transcriptomic characterization of surging MBCs was performed by single-cell RNA sequencing. RESULTS: In BEL-treated patients, a significant increase in circulating MBCs, in a broad range of MBC subsets, was established at week 2, gradually returning to baseline by week 52. The increase was most prominent in patients with higher SLE disease activity, serologically active patients and patients aged ≤18 years. MBCs had a non-proliferating phenotype with a prominent decrease in activation status and downregulation of numerous migration genes. CONCLUSION: Upon BEL initiation, an increase of MBCs was firmly established. In the small cohort investigated, circulating MBCs were de-activated, non-proliferative and demonstrated characteristics of disrupted lymphocyte trafficking, expanding on our understanding of the therapeutic mechanism of B-cell-activating factor inhibition by BEL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00071487, NCT00410384, NCT01632241, NCT01649765, NCT03312907, NCT03747159.
Abstract licence: CC BY
I. Parodis, J. Lindblom, R. A. Levy, et al.
The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2024
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Remission Induction
I. Parodis, J. Lindblom, L. Palazzo, et al.
RMD Open, 2025
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Secondary Data Analysis
OBJECTIVES: To determine belimumab efficacy assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from phase III belimumab randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A post hoc analysis was carried out on five RCTs in active adult SLE: four with intravenous (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-NEA, EMBRACE) and one with subcutaneous belimumab (BLISS-SC). The 52-week landmark assessments were analysed across trials. Treatment response was defined according to BICLA criteria (BILAG improvement; no worsening of disease activity based on BILAG and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2K; no deterioration in Physician's Global Assessment ≥0.3 (scale: 0-3); no treatment failure). RESULTS: A total of 3086 patients received belimumab (n=1869) or placebo (n=1217). BICLA response frequencies at week 52 were greater with belimumab vs placebo in BLISS-52 (OR (95% CI): 1.49 (1.05-2.12); p=0.024), BLISS-NEA (1.62 (1.12-2.33); p=0.010) and BLISS-SC (1.89 (1.39-2.57); p<0.001). A highly significant difference was observed in the pooled population (1.47 (1.25-1.72); p<0.001; adjusted for trial variance). Belimumab yielded greater BICLA response frequencies than placebo irrespective of baseline glucocorticoid dose (>7.5 or ≤7.5 mg/day of a prednisone equivalent), in patients with baseline SLEDAI-2K≥10 and in patients with positive anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA and/or low C3/C4 levels at baseline. Belimumab combined with anti-malarials yielded greater frequency of BICLA response attainment. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of five RCTs evaluating belimumab in SLE, belimumab conferred superiority over placebo to yield BICLA response in the overall study population and in subgroups of patients with high global or serological activity at baseline. The benefit of belimumab was more prominent when combined with anti-malarials.
Abstract licence: CC BY
X. Mariette, F. Barone, C. Baldini, et al.
JCI Insight, 2022
- Sjogren's Syndrome
- Rituximab
BACKGROUNDPrimary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is characterized by B cell hyperactivity and elevated B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS). Anti-BLyS treatment (e.g., belimumab) increases peripheral memory B cells; decreases naive, activated, and plasma B cell subsets; and increases stringency on B cell selection during reconstitution. Anti-CD20 therapeutics (e.g., rituximab) bind and deplete CD20-expressing B cells in circulation but are less effective in depleting tissue-resident CD20+ B cells. Combined, these 2 mechanisms may achieve synergistic effects.METHODSThis 68-week, phase II, double-blind study (GSK study 201842) randomized 86 adult patients with active pSS to 1 of 4 arms: placebo, s.c. belimumab, i.v. rituximab, or sequential belimumab + rituximab.RESULTSOverall, 60 patients completed treatment and follow-up until week 68. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug-related AEs was similar across groups. Infections/infestations were the most common AEs, and no serious infections of special interest occurred. Near-complete depletion of minor salivary gland CD20+ B cells and a greater and more sustained depletion of peripheral CD19+ B cells were observed with belimumab + rituximab versus monotherapies. With belimumab + rituximab, reconstitution of peripheral B cells occurred, but it was delayed compared with rituximab. At week 68, mean (± standard error) total EULAR Sjögren's syndrome disease activity index scores decreased from 11.0 (1.17) at baseline to 5.0 (1.27) for belimumab + rituximab and 10.4 (1.36) to 8.6 (1.57) for placebo.CONCLUSIONThe safety profile of belimumab + rituximab in pSS was consistent with the monotherapies. Belimumab + rituximab induced enhanced salivary gland B cell depletion relative to the monotherapies, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02631538.FUNDINGFunding was provided by GSK.
Abstract licence: CC BY
B. Frade-Sosa, J. Sarmiento-Monroy, Ian N Bruce, et al.
Autoimmunity reviews, 2025
- Rituximab
- B-Lymphocytes
- Immunosuppressive Agents
Cynthia Aranow, C. Allaart, Zahir Amoura, et al.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2024
- Rituximab
- Antibodies, Antinuclear
OBJECTIVES: Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX). METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets. RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. CONCLUSIONS: BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03312907.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
G. Moysidou, P. Garantziotis, G. Sentis, et al.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2024
OBJECTIVES: Belimumab is a putative disease-modifying agent in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet the molecular underpinnings of its effects and the ability to predict early clinical response remain unexplored. To address these, we undertook a longitudinal, in-depth blood transcriptome study. METHODS: RNA-sequencing was performed in the blood of active SLE patients at baseline and following 6 months of belimumab treatment (n=45 paired samples). Clinical response was determined according to the SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was used to uncover gene module trait associations. Reversibility of SLE susceptibility and severity gene signatures was assessed. Machine learning was used to build models predictive of response. RESULTS: Belimumab induced widespread transcriptome changes with downregulation of pathways related to B cells, type I/II interferon, IL-6/STAT3 and neutrophil activation. These effects were more pronounced among patients with LLDAS+ compared with to SRI-4+/LLDAS- response, with amelioration of the SLE 'susceptibility' signature observed in the former group. Unsupervised analysis unveiled gene modules enriched in neutrophil degranulation, type I interferon signalling and cytokine production to correlate positively with response at 6 months. Using neural networks, a set of 50 genes (including CCL4L2, CARD10, MMP15 and KLRC2) predicted response to belimumab with a cross-validated 84% specificity (test set). Lack of response was linked to perturbations of the cell cycle checkpoints, PI3K/ Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin and TGF-beta signalling pathways. CONCLUSION: Belimumab treatment ameliorates multiple innate and adaptive immunity dysregulations of SLE and may reverse the disease signature, consistent with the drug effects on reducing activity and preventing flares. Fingerprints of innate immunity correlate with robust improvement whereas DNA damage response with less responsive disease to BAFF inhibition.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Mieke van Schaik, E. Arends, M. Wetzels, et al.
Lupus Science & Medicine, 2025
- Rituximab
- Autoantibodies
- B-Lymphocytes
OBJECTIVE: Combination therapy with rituximab and belimumab is a novel treatment strategy for severe SLE and lupus nephritis. Phase II studies have shown promising results, although long-term data are currently lacking. To address this, we analysed outcomes of patients with severe treatment-refractory SLE who previously participated in the phase II Synbiose Study, with a particular focus on immunological parameters. METHODS: Eight patients continued belimumab treatment beyond the 2-year duration of the original trial. We conducted a descriptive study to evaluate the course of treatment and immunological parameters over an extended follow-up. Our analyses include blood cell counts, immunoglobulins, autoantibodies, complement markers and clinical disease activity parameters. Additionally, we examined long-term effects on the B cell compartment employing high-sensitivity flow cytometry. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 6.8 years, six out of eight previously treatment-refractory patients maintained long-term clinical remission, while two experienced a major flare. Among those in remission, two patients achieved immunosuppression-free remission, and four continued belimumab. Long-term effects on humoral (auto-)immunity were a persistent decrease in IgM levels, while IgG normalised. Most patients maintained low autoantibody titres, and complement markers remained normal. On the cellular level, belimumab treatment after rituximab prevented B cell repopulation. Notably, patients exhibited a stable reduction of double-negative (DN) B cells, irrespective of continuing or stopping belimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Long-lasting remission was observed in patients with SLE following combination treatment with rituximab and belimumab. We observed no significant hypogammaglobulinaemia and, notably, persistent reduction of DN B cells.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
1.8 days
Mechanism
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis, a common and serious man…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
74-82%
[A251500]…
Half-life
10 mg/k
Protein binding
Volume of distribution
10 mg/k
[L42630]…
Metabolism
[L42705]…
Elimination
Clearance
10 mg/k
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Belimumab was first approved by the FDA on March 9, 2011,[A251495] making it the newest drug to be approved for the treatment of SLE in more than 50 years.[A251520] It is currently used to treat SLE and lupus nephritis.[L42630]
[L42630]
In Europe, belimumab is also used to treat SLE and lupus nephritis but only in adults.
[L42705]
The efficacy of belimumab has not been evaluated in patients with severe active central nervous system lupus. Use of belimumab is not recommended in this situation.
[L42630]
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 681 interactions
There is limited experience with overdosage of belimumab. Two doses of up to 20 mg/kg have been given intravenously to humans with no increase in incidence or severity of adverse reactions compared with doses of 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg.
[L42630]
In the case of inadvertent overdose, patients should be carefully observed and supportive care administered, as appropriate[L42705]
Belimumab is an antibody directed against BLyS: it selectively binds BLyS with high affinity, neutralizes it, and blocks its interaction with B cell receptors - transmembrane activator and calcium-modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI), B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA),[A251520] and BLyS receptor 3 (BR3).[A14436][A251520] Belimumab ultimately inhibits the survival of B cells, promotes apoptosis, and reduces the differentiation and maturation of B cells into immunoglobulin-producing plasma cells.[A14436][A251520][L42630]
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
[A251500]
Following administration of 10 mg/kg belimumab via intravenous infusion in adults with SLE, the Cmax was 313 mcg/mL and the AUC0-∞ was 3,083 day x mcg/mL. Following subcutaneous administration of 200 mg belimumab once-weekly in adults with SLE, the Cmax was 108 mcg/mL and the AUC0-∞ was 726 day x mcg/mL.
[L42630]
In healthy Japanese volunteers, the Tmax was 6.5 days after administration of a single subcutaneous dose of 200 mg/mL belimumab.
[A251505]
Steady-state exposure was reached after approximately 11 weeks of subcutaneous administration in healthy subjects of patients with SLE.
[L42705]
[L42630]
[L42630]
[L42705]
[L42630]
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
A third B-cell specific BAFF-receptor (BAFFR/BR3) promotes the survival of mature B-cells and the B-cell response
ATC L04AG04
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Belimumab
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
20836
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:11929
GenAtlas
TNFSF13B
GeneCards
TNFSF13B
GenBank Gene Database
AF136293
GenBank Protein Database
4761612
UniProt Accession
TN13B_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Molecular structure

ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q1996249), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. Molecular structure images from Wikimedia Commons. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.