Ublituximab 150mg/6ml solution for infusion vials

Background: Relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), is indicated for the treatment of RMS. We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify randomized trials reporting the clinical efficacy and tolerability of ublituximab or comparator disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for treatment of RMS, and assessed their comparative effects using network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: The SLR involved a comprehensive search across various medical databases to identify relevant studies. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of an adult RMS population, focusing on treatment with at least one of ublituximab, alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, or ofatumumab. For outcomes included in the NMA (annualized relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression (CDP), and treatment discontinuation rate), rate ratios (RR) or hazard ratios (HR), along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. We performed NMA using a contrast-based random-effects model within a frequentist framework for all outcomes. Ranking probabilities among comparators, and intervention rankings for the NMA, were estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: We included 15 RCTs in the review. For the ARR outcome, there was no statistically significant difference between ublituximab and the other included mAbs [ofatumumab (RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.64-1.62)), natalizumab (RR 0.99 (0.59-1.65)), alemtuzumab (RR 0.86 (0.51-1.46)), and ocrelizumab (RR 0.75 (0.44-1.28))]. For CDP at 6 months, our results showed no statistically significant difference between ublituximab and the comparator mAbs [ofatumumab (HR 0.97 (0.49-1.92)), natalizumab (HR 1.13 (0.53-2.40)), alemtuzumab (HR 1.25 (0.56-2.81)), and ocrelizumab (HR 1.29 (0.57-2.90))]. For CDP at 3 and 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between ublituximab and placebo. The all-cause treatment discontinuation rate analysis showed no significant difference between ublituximab and other mAbs, except for alemtuzumab. Conclusions: Results of this SLR-informed NMA showed that there is no statistically significant difference between ublituximab and the other mAbs in terms of clinical efficacy. Additionally, the findings show that there is no statistically significant difference in discontinuation rates with the exception of the comparison with alemtuzumab, which may be attributed to its unique dosing schedule.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background: Ublituximab, a novel monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen, is glycoengineered for enhanced B-cell targeting through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Greater ADCC may allow lower doses and shorter infusion times versus other anti-CD20 mAbs. Objective: The objective was to determine optimal dose, infusion time, and activity of ublituximab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Methods: This is a phase 2, placebo-controlled study. Patients received three ublituximab infusions (150 mg over 1–4 hours on day 1 and 450–600 mg over 1–3 hours on day 15 and week 24) in six dosing cohorts. The primary endpoint was B-cell depletion. Results: In all cohorts ( N = 48), median B-cell depletion was >99% by week 4, maintained at weeks 24 and 48. Most common adverse events (AEs) were infusion-related reactions (all grade 1–2), with no apparent increased incidence at shorter infusion times. There were no AE-related discontinuations. At weeks 24 and 48, no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions ( p = 0.003) and a 10.6% decrease in T2 lesion volume ( p = 0.002) were detected. The annualized relapse rate was 0.07; 93% remained relapse free on study. Overall, 74% of patients had no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). Conclusion: Ublituximab was safely infused as rapid as 1 hour, producing robust B-cell depletion and profound reductions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and relapses.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

ABSTRACT: Many patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) will develop treatment resistance to Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, including umbralisib, have significant clinical activity in relapsed/refractory CLL, but prolonged exposure is associated with potential toxicities. Owing to the synergistic antitumor effects of combined PI3K and BCL-2 inhibition, we sought to explore the feasibility of response-adapted, time-limited therapy to optimize disease control while mitigating the risks of prolonged treatment. We conducted a phase 1/2 clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with umbralisib and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, ublituximab, (U2-VeN) in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL (N = 46) and Richter transformation (N = 5). After 12 cycles, treatment was stopped for patients with CLL who achieved undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD). Adverse events of special interest included diarrhea in 50% of patients (11% grade 3/4), and aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase elevation in 15 patients (33%), with 3 (7%) grade 3/4. There were no cases of tumor lysis syndrome related to venetoclax, with outpatient initiation in 96% of patients. The intent-to-treat overall response rate for CLL was 98% with best response of 100% in evaluable patients (42% complete responses). The end-of-treatment rate of uMRD at 10-4 in bone marrow was 77% (30/39), including a 71% uMRD rate among 14 patients refractory to prior BTK inhibitor. Time-limited venetoclax and U2 is safe and highly effective combination therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL including those who have been previously treated with covalent BTK inhibitors. This trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03379051.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

B cells are critical to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. B cell depletion using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has proven to be an extremely successful treatment strategy, with profound suppression of both clinical and radiological evidence of focal inflammatory disease. Several anti-CD20 mAbs are now licensed for use in MS, with ublituximab being the latest to gain regulatory approval. The unique properties of each of the anti-CD20 mAb may result in nuanced differences in timing, duration and depth of B cell depletion, with the potential for such differences to have a clinical relevance to both drug efficacy and adverse effects. In this review, we summarize the design, development, and current place in MS therapy for ublituximab.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Background Ublituximab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The phase 3 ULTIMATE I and II studies showed significant improvements in annualized relapse rate, total number of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions, and total number of new or enlarging T2 at Week 96, as well as improvement in the proportion of participants with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) from Weeks 24–96 with ublituximab vs. teriflunomide. Methods In ULTIMATE I (NCT03277261; www.clinicaltrials.gov ) ( N = 549) and II (NCT03277248; www.clinicaltrials.gov ) ( N = 545), participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis received ublituximab 450 mg intravenous infusion every 24 weeks (following Day 1 infusion of 150 mg and Day 15 infusion of 450 mg) or teriflunomide 14 mg oral once daily for 96 weeks. Pooled post hoc analyses evaluated NEDA by treatment epoch and participant subtype: age ( ≤ 38 or >38 years), early or later disease (<3 or ≥3 years following diagnosis), treatment history (treatment naïve or previously treated), 0 or ≥1 Gd+ T1 lesions at baseline, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤ 3.5 or >3.5 at baseline. NEDA was defined as no confirmed relapses, no Gd+ T1 lesions, no new or enlarging T2 lesions, and no disability progression confirmed for ≥12 weeks. Results NEDA rates in the ublituximab vs. teriflunomide cohorts by treatment epoch were: Weeks 0–96, 44.6% vs. 12.4% (3.6 × improvement); Weeks 24–96 (re-baselined), 82.1% vs. 22.5% (3.6 × improvement); and Weeks 48–96 (re-baselined), 88.2% vs. 30.4% (2.9 × improvement) (all p < 0.0001). The primary driver of disease activity in ublituximab-treated participants was new or enlarging T2 lesions during Weeks 0–24. 41.8% of ublituximab-treated participants who had evidence of disease activity in the first year (Weeks 0–48) experienced NEDA in the second year of treatment (Weeks 48–96) compared with 17.3% of teriflunomide-treated participants. At Weeks 24–96 (re-baselined), rates of NEDA were significantly higher with ublituximab than teriflunomide in all participant subtypes (all p < 0.0001). Conclusions ULTIMATE I and II pooled post hoc analyses demonstrated a consistent NEDA benefit among ublituximab-treated participants across treatment epochs and key participant subpopulations.

Abstract licence: CC BY

OBJECTIVE: To test the safety of ublituximab, a B cell depleting agent, as add-on therapy in the acute treatment of relapses of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. METHODS: We conducted an open-label phase 1b safety and proof-of-concept trial in 5 subjects with aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG) seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) who presented with acute transverse myelitis and/or optic neuritis. In addition to treating with 1 g of daily intravenous methylprednisolone, we infused a single dose of 450 mg of ublituximab within 5 days of relapse onset. The primary outcome measure was safety, and the secondary efficacy measures included change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), durability of remission and B cell counts. RESULTS: Five NMOSD subjects were enrolled, 4 of whom presented with acute transverse myelitis and 1 with acute optic neuritis. Ublituximab proved to be safe in all 5 NMOSD subjects, with no serious adverse events recorded. There were no opportunistic infections in any of the subjects; however, 1 subject experienced a transient leukopenia. EDSS scores dropped from a median of 6.5 on admission to 4.0 on 90-day follow up. Two subjects did not achieve total B cell depletion and relapsed within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Ublituximab is a safe add-on therapy for NMOSD patients presenting with acute transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Preliminary evidence suggests a promising benefit on durability of remission when B cell depletion is achieved. A placebo-controlled trial is necessary to confirm these findings. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with NMOSD with acute transverse myelitis or optic neuritis, ublituximab is safe and may improve neurological outcome.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC