Amphotericin B phospholipid complex 100mg/20ml dispersion for infusion vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 13 · Randomised trials: 2 · 1980–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
J. Wingard, M. White, E. Anaissie, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
Fan Y, Gu Y, Tong X, et al.
2025
- Leishmaniasis
- Antiprotozoal Agents
- Leishmaniasis, Visceral
ObjectivesLeishmaniasis is a vector-borne neglected tropical infectious disease hat can be fatal if visceral leishmaniasis is left untreated. At present, many drugs have been used to treat leishmaniasis. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different drugs to treat leishmaniasis through a network meta-analysis.MethodsAll studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, and the search time was from the date of database establishment to February 21, 2024. We assessed rates of clinical cure, mortality, and adverse effects (diarrhea, vomiting, injection site pain, and liver-enzyme abnormalities). We performed subgroup analyses of rates of clinical cure according to geographic region. All statistical analyses were performed using R and STATA 14.0 software for network meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023478585.Results12 articles with 2483 patients were included in this study, and the therapeutic effects of 5 drugs were evaluated. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that the clinical cure rate of miltefosine, pentavalent antimony, and paromomycin was inferior to amphotericin B (RR 0.31; 95%CI 0.07-11.4, RR 0.23; 95%CI 0.04-1.39, RR 0.12; 95% CI 0.01-1.55), and amphotericin B may have the highest clinical cure rate. The mortality of pentavalent antimony was higher than that of amphotericin B and miltefosine (RR 4.81; 95%CI 0.42-41.45, RR 3.75; 95% CI 0.57-24.74), pentavalent antimony may be the drug with the highest mortality during treatment. About adverse effects, vomiting, and diarrhea were most common with miltefosine, and pain at the injection site and abnormalities in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were most common with paromomycin. Subgroup analysis showed that clinical cure rates using Pentavalent antimony treatment were better in Brazil than in Ethiopia and India.ConclusionsThis systematic review and network meta-analysis provide a new comparative framework for the clinical management of leishmaniasis. The results of network meta-analysis suggest that amphotericin B may be the first choice for the treatment of leishmaniasis, pentavalent antimony may be the drug with the highest mortality during treatment, miltefosine causes the highest incidence of gastrointestinal reactions, and paromomycin causes the highest incidence of injection site pain, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase abnormalities. More high-quality studies are still needed to further determine the optimal drug for the clinical treatment of leishmaniasis in the future.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023478585.
Abstract licence: CC BY
R. Caputo, M. Asprea, L. Giovannetti, et al.
Archives of Medical Science : AMS, 2020
Thomas J. Walsh, J. Hiemenz, N. Seibel, et al.
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1998
D.A. Bossio, K.M. Scow
Microbial Ecology, 1998
Simon A. Levin
Ecosystems, 1998
K. Akinosoglou, Emmanouil-Angelos Rigopoulos, Despoina Papageorgiou, et al.
Journal of Fungi, 2024
Ian M. Hann, H.Grant Prentice
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2001
M. Aigner, C. Lass-Flörl
Journal of Fungi, 2020
A. Safdar, Jonathan Ma, F. Saliba, et al.
Medicine, 2010
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.