Amphotericin B liposomal 50mg powder for dispersion for infusion vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
3 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Amphotericin B liposomal on the MHRA register
Amphotericin B liposomal 50mg powder for dispersion for infusion vials
Amphotericin B liposomal 50mg powder for dispersion for infusion vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
35 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 10 · Randomised trials: 10 · 1964–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Oliver A. Cornely, Johan Maertens, Mark Bresnik, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
- Aspergillosis
Ernst-Rüdiger Kuse, Ploenchan Chetchotisakd, Clóvis Arns da Cunha, et al.
The Lancet, 2007
- Micafungin
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
John R. Wingard, Mary H. White, E. Anaissie, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
- Drug Carriers
Bart Rijnders, Jan J. Cornelissen, Lennert Slobbe, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Administration, Inhalation
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
Michael Ellis, David J. Spence, Ben de Pauw, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
- Aspergillosis
Richard J. Hamill, Jack D. Sobel, Wafaa El‐Sadr, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
- Canada
Neil Stone, Tihana Bicanic, Rahuman Salim, et al.
Drugs, 2016
- Amphotericin B
- Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
- Clinical Trials as Topic
He L, Chen L, Liu C
2026
ObjectiveTo investigate the rapid progression and key treatment strategies for invasive pulmonary mucormycosis caused by Rhizopus in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).MethodsWe report a fatal case of severe Rhizopus pneumonia in a patient with DKA and conducted a systematic review of relevant cases from PubMed and Web of Science for descriptive analysis.ResultsA 39-year-old male with DKA developed severe lung lesions within days post-admission. Despite confirmation via pathological diagnosis and the initiation of liposomal amphotericin B therapy, the patient succumbed rapidly. Incorporating 15 cases identified from the literature, the total cohort comprised 16 patients, yielding an overall mortality rate of 25% (4/16). Cases involving DKA frequently exhibited narrow diagnostic windows and rapid progression to respiratory failure. Most cases (11/15) received amphotericin B-based therapy, and some with localized lesions (7/15) underwent surgical resection.ConclusionPulmonary mucormycosis with DKA can progress rapidly and carries high risk. Treatment typically involves amphotericin B preparations, supplemented by surgery for focal disease. Key strategies include maintaining a high index of clinical suspicion in high-risk hosts, early pathological/molecular diagnosis, prompt antifungal therapy alongside metabolic correction, and timely surgical evaluation for localized lesions.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Cavalcante DVS, de Oliveira LML, Husain N, et al.
2026
- Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous
- Leishmaniasis, Visceral
- Amphotericin B
Marit D Moen, Katherine A. Lyseng‐Williamson, Lesley J. Scott
Drugs, 2009
- Amphotericin B
- Antifungal Agents
- Mycoses
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q412223), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.