Zuclopenthixol acetate 50mg/1ml solution for injection ampoules
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Zuclopenthixol, also known as Zuclopentixol or Zuclopenthixolum, is an antipsychotic agent.
Shortage warning
Current supply issues
High shortage warning
Healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for delayed onset of angioedema and the distinction between bradykinin- and histamine-mediated cases, as treatment strategies differ significantly and bradykinin-medi…
Affected areas: UK
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Zuclopenthixol acetate
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Zuclopenthixol acetate
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Part of the Clopixol brand family (generic: Zuclopenthixol acetate)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Zuclopenthixol acetate on the MHRA register
Clopixol Acuphase 50mg/1ml solution for injection ampoules
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
30 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 14 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 3 · 2001–2026
Showing all 14 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Hamza T, Chalkou K, Pellegrini F, et al.
2026
OBJECTIVES: Network meta-analysis (NMA) with individual participant data can estimate how treatment effects change with patient characteristics. Yet cost-effectiveness analyses typically use population-average effects. We introduce a framework that incorporates NMA-derived heterogeneous treatment effects into cost-effectiveness analysis using a risk-modelling approach. METHODS: We first derived a baseline risk score for each patient using a prognostic model. This risk score was then used as effect modifier in a network meta-regression to estimate risk-specific treatment effects. These effects were incorporated into the cost-effectiveness model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefits (NMBs) as functions of the baseline risk score. We demonstrated the approach using data from observational and randomized studies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, comparing dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, and placebo. RESULTS: Risk-dependent treatment effects from the prediction-NMR framework led to substantial variation in cost-effectiveness across the baseline risk distribution. When these treatment effects were incorporated into the cost-effectiveness model, ICERs increased steadily across baseline risk quintiles, from 48,811 CHF/QALY in the lowest-risk group to 212,870 CHF/QALY in the highest. Dimethyl fumarate has a higher NMB up to a baseline risk of 55%, after which glatiramer acetate becomes the preferred option. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that integrating baseline risk modelling with NMA and cost-effectiveness analysis provides more informative decision-making than relying on average effects. Treatment value can vary substantially across the risk spectrum, indicating that optimal therapy selection is strongly dependent on individual patient risk.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Kaushadh Jayakody, R. Gibson, Ajit Kumar, et al.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012
- Acute Disease
- Aggression
- Benzodiazepines
M. Fenton, E. Coutinho, C. Campbell
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001
- Acute Disease
- Clopenthixol
- Psychotic Disorders
Vellar K, Khalid U, Coleman M
2023
- Clopenthixol
- Quality Improvement
- Health Services
Piñar-Morales R, Guirado-Ruiz PA, Barrero Hernández FJ
2025
- Fatigue
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Quality of Life
INTRODUCTION: Fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS) is defined as the lack of physical and/or mental energy perceived by the individual that interferes with normal activities. It is the most common symptom in MS, present in up to 90% of people with MS. Fatigue along with disability, depression, cognitive impairment, and disease-modifying therapy (DMT) affect quality of life (QoL). METHOD: We designed a prospective observational study in patients with MS and DMT of moderate efficacy to assess the association between fatigue and the epidemiological, clinical, and pharmacological aspects that influence in the QoL. We analysed variables related to patients, disability, fatigue (MFIS), clinical and radiological activity, depression (BDI), cognitive impairment (SDMT), and QoL (EQ-5D). RESULTS: we included 91 people, 65.9% women, mean age 43.9 years. The DMT were: 27.4% interferon-β, 15.38% glatiramer acetate, 9.89% teriflunomide, and 47.25% dimethyl fumarate. The median of the EDSS was 1.5 points. 40.9% have presented fatigue, 36.3% cognitive deterioration and 30.7% of the patients depression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fatigue are older, more disabled, have a higher prevalence of depression and worse QoL. Evolution time, relapses, MRI lesion load, and DMTs are not associated with fatigue. Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients with MS that influences in the QoL, hence the importance of its diagnosis and treatment.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Aliyu M, Saboor-Yaraghi AA, Sahraian MA, et al.
2025
- Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Disease Models, Animal
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disorder that is characterized by demyelination, neurodegeneration, and immune dysregulation. The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model has helped to elucidate MS pathophysiology and test therapies. This review synthesizes current literature on the development, applications, and translational significance of EAE models in MS research. It discusses various EAE induction protocols, including active and passive immunization, and highlights advancements such as humanized mice and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neuronal models. The review evaluates the role of EAE in identifying immune pathways, validating therapeutic agents like glatiramer acetate and natalizumab, and exploring precision medicine approaches through biomarker discovery. The EAE model replicated the key features of MS, including inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss, facilitating therapy development. However, its predictive validity faces limitations, such as heterogeneity in disease induction, underrepresentation of chronic progression, and species differences. Innovations, such as humanized mouse models and iPSC-derived neurons, show promise in addressing these challenges. EAE research has advanced biomarker-based personalized treatments, although further validation is required. Despite its widespread use, EAE has limitations in terms of variability in disease induction, incomplete MS feature replication, species-specific responses, and clinical translation. Addressing these limitations remains crucial for therapeutic development, focusing on analyzing model limitations and strategies to overcome translational barriers. This review offers immunologists a comprehensive overview of EAE's contributions of EAE to MS research and its potential to inform the development of novel therapeutic approaches for this debilitating disease.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Bondili Sesharamsingh, J. Suresh Kumar, I. V. Kasi Viswanath, et al.
Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2023
Abstract Background The present study focused to develop a simple and sensitive HPLC method for resolution and estimation process-related impurities of zuclopenthixol and further assessment of forced degradation behavior of zuclopenthixol. Results The chromatographic separation of drug substance, process-related impurities and its degradation products (DPs) was achieved on KNAUER C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5µ id) column at that was maintained at 35 °C temperature using 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.3 and methanol in 20:80 (v/v) as mobile phase A, 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile in 75:25 (v/v) as mobile phase B. Equal volume of mobile phase A and B was pumped in isocratic elution at 0.8 mL/min. Detection wavelength was selected as 257 nm. In the proposed conditions, zuclopenthixol is identified at 6.91 and 1.91 min and 2.89 min, respectively, for impurity B and A min with acceptable system suitability and specificity. The method produces LOD at 0.009 for impurities with calibration range of 30–180 µg/mL for zuclopenthixol and 0.03–0.18 µg/mL for impurities. The other validation parameters were notices to be with in the acceptable levels for zuclopenthixol and its impurities. The drug was exposed to different stressed conditions (acid, base, peroxide, thermal and UV light) according to ICH Q1A (R2) guidelines. The DPs formed during the stress study were identified and characterized by LCMS/MS in ESI positive mode. Conclusion The analysis involved a comparison of collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry data between the degradation products and zuclopenthixol. As a result, potential structures for six degradation compounds were suggested. The results from additional validation studies were similarly pleasing and demonstrated their suitability for the routine analysis of zuclopenthixol and its associated impurities in both bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Additionally, these findings can be extended to assess the mechanism of stress degradation in zuclopenthixol.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Abdallah FF, Abdelaleem EA, Korany AG, et al.
2026
- Drug Contamination
- Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
- Chromatography, Thin Layer
Schiller M, Steiner K, Bonnet U, et al.
2026
Reda MD, Siva A, Tahir Turanlı E
2026
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Glatiramer Acetate
- Pharmacogenetics
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous, immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, with substantial interindividual variability in disease course and response to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Over the past three decades, the MS therapeutic landscape has expanded considerably; however, treatment selection and switching remain guided primarily by clinical phenotype and imaging findings rather than molecular predictors of response. Despite extensive clinical trial evidence, prospectively identifying responders and non-responders to specific DMTs remains challenging. Genetic variability appears to influence differences in treatment efficacy, tolerability, and long-term outcomes in people with MS. Numerous candidate pharmacogenomic variants have been reported across interferon-β, glatiramer acetate, oral agents, and monoclonal antibodies; nevertheless, replication has been inconsistent, effect sizes are modest, and no genetic marker has yet been clinically validated for routine use. Consequently, pharmacogenomics is largely absent from current MS treatment algorithms. This review critically evaluates the existing pharmacogenomic literature across approved DMTs, highlighting reproducible findings, methodological limitations, and gaps that hinder clinical translation. We further discuss requirements for integrating pharmacogenomic markers into routine practice, emphasizing the need for large, multiethnic cohorts, standardized response definitions, and functional validation. Overall, these insights underscore both the potential and current limitations of pharmacogenomics in advancing precision medicine for MS.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
37 found
Half-life
20 hours
Mechanism
Zuclopenthixol is a typical antipsychotic neuroleptic drug of the thioxanthene class.
Food interactions
2 warnings
Human targets
7 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Half-life
20 hours
Protein binding
98-99%
Volume of distribution
20 L/kg
Metabolism
Elimination
10%
Clearance
0.9 L
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 1779 interactions
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome may occur. Zuclopenthixol may potentiate anticholinergic effects of concurrent medications. Zuclopenthixol has a demonstrated antiemetic effect in animals, and may mask signs of toxicity due to other drug overdoses, or may mask symptoms of disease.
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:21645528
Positively regulates postnatal regression of retinal hyaloid vessels via suppression of VEGFR2/KDR activity, downstream of OPN5 (By similarity)
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
ATC N05AF05
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
11264
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
191
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
190
ChemSpider
4470984
BindingDB
79209
ZINC
ZINC000000601293
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:3020
GenAtlas
DRD1
GeneCards
DRD1
GenBank Gene Database
X55760
GenBank Protein Database
30397
Guide to Pharmacology
214
UniProt Accession
DRD1_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:3026
GenAtlas
DRD5
GeneCards
DRD5
GenBank Gene Database
X58454
GenBank Protein Database
32049
Guide to Pharmacology
218
UniProt Accession
DRD5_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:3023
GenAtlas
DRD2
GeneCards
DRD2
GenBank Gene Database
M30625
GenBank Protein Database
181432
Guide to Pharmacology
215
UniProt Accession
DRD2_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:277
GenAtlas
ADRA1A
GeneCards
ADRA1A
GenBank Gene Database
D25235
GenBank Protein Database
433201
Guide to Pharmacology
22
UniProt Accession
ADA1A_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:281
GenAtlas
ADRA2A
GeneCards
ADRA2A
GenBank Gene Database
M23533
GenBank Protein Database
178196
Guide to Pharmacology
25
UniProt Accession
ADA2A_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:5293
GenAtlas
HTR2A
GeneCards
HTR2A
GenBank Gene Database
S42168
GenBank Protein Database
36431
Guide to Pharmacology
6
UniProt Accession
5HT2A_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:5182
GenAtlas
HRH1
GeneCards
HRH1
GenBank Gene Database
Z34897
GenBank Protein Database
510296
Guide to Pharmacology
262
UniProt Accession
HRH1_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2637
GenAtlas
CYP3A4
GeneCards
CYP3A4
GenBank Gene Database
M18907
Guide to Pharmacology
1337
UniProt Accession
CP3A4_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2625
GenAtlas
CYP2D6
GeneCards
CYP2D6
GenBank Gene Database
M20403
GenBank Protein Database
181350
Guide to Pharmacology
1329
UniProt Accession
CP2D6_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q228143), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.