Zinc hyaluronate 0.15% eye drops preservative free
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 12 · Randomised trials: 6 · 1979–2024
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
B. Ang, J. Sng, Priscilla X. Wang, et al.
Scientific Reports, 2017
Hyemin Kim, Hyeonseon Jeong, Seulgi Han, et al.
Biomaterials, 2017
Mengke Peng, Xiannong Tang, Kang Xiao, et al.
Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2023
Yan Liu, Jia-shun Wu, W. Fei, et al.
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2017
Qinglin Wu, Zuqing Wu, Zhifu Lu
2023
Background: The efficacy of acupotomy combined with hyaluronic sodium acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of acupotomy combined with hyaluronic sodium acid compared with hyaluronic sodium acid alone in the treatment of KOA. Methods: Studies from 8 Online databases were searched on KOA treatment using acupotomy combined with sodium hyaluronate until May 2022. The primary outcome indicator was clinical effectiveness, and the secondary outcome indicators included the visual analogue scale scores and Lysholm scores. We calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) or relative risk for all relevant outcomes. Results: Nine studies were identified, involving 644 cases. The results showed that acupotomy combined with intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injection for KOA was superior to sodium hyaluronate injection alone in terms of clinical effectiveness (relative risk = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.25, P < .001) and visual analogue scale (WMD = −2.1, 95% CI: −2.25 to 1.95, P < .001), Lysholm score (WMD = 13.83, 95% CI: 3.47–24.19, P = .009). Conclusion: Acupotomy combined with intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injection for KOA is superior to sodium hyaluronate injection alone. Limited by the number and quality of included studies, this conclusion still needs to be verified by more high-quality Research. INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202350029.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
Y. Wen, Xiaocheng Zhang, Mao-sheng Chen, et al.
Annals of palliative medicine, 2020
Yong-Beom Park, C. Ha, Choong-hee Lee, et al.
Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 2016
Weijiang Yu, Guohua Jiang, Yang Zhang, et al.
Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2017
J. de Grauw, M. Visser-Meijer, F. Lashley, et al.
Equine veterinary journal, 2016
X. Bao, Jiewen Tan, Michael Flyzik, et al.
Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2018
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.