Zanubrutinib 80mg capsules

Background and Objective: Zanubrutinib, a next-generation Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has demonstrated promising efficacy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients. However, evidence synthesis across clinical trials remains limited. We conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of zanubrutinib in CLL. Methods: This study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane recommendations. PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to August 2025 using terms related to zanubrutinib and CLL/SLL. Eligible studies included clinical trials of zanubrutinib in TN or R/R CLL/SLL patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI tool for non-randomized studies and for RCTs. Pooled estimates of efficacy outcomes were calculated using a random-effects model. Pooled estimates were calculated using the DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model, which accounts for both within- and between-study variability. Results: Seven studies (n > 1000) were included, enrolling both TN and R/R patients across diverse global populations. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 93.3% (95% CI, 86.7–99.8%) in mixed TN and R/R populations, 94.4% (95% CI, 91.6–97.3%) in TN patients, and 83.9% (95% CI, 75.0–92.8%) in R/R patients. Complete response (CR) rates were 12.2% (95% CI, 0.3–24.2%) overall, 13.8% (95% CI, 1.5–26.2%) in TN patients, and 5.0% (95% CI, 0.3–9.8%) in R/R patients. Partial response (PR) rates reached 86.0% (95% CI, 82.6–89.5%) in TN and 63.2% (95% CI, 53.5–73.0%) in R/R patients. Progressive disease was rare (≤1% in R/R cohorts). Heterogeneity was moderate to high across several outcomes. Conclusions: Zanubrutinib demonstrates favorable efficacy in CLL, achieving high ORR in both TN and R/R patients, with particularly durable responses in TN populations. Although complete response rates remain modest, especially among R/R patients, overall disease control appears consistent. These findings support zanubrutinib as an effective treatment option across CLL settings; however, variability among studies and the modest CR rates highlight the need for longer follow-up and direct comparative trials to further define its clinical role.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: In a multinational, phase 3, head-to-head trial, ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was compared with zanubrutinib, a BTK inhibitor with greater specificity, as treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In prespecified interim analyses, zanubrutinib was superior to ibrutinib with respect to overall response (the primary end point). Data from the final analysis of progression-free survival are now available. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL who had received at least one previous course of therapy to receive zanubrutinib or ibrutinib until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. In this final analysis, progression-free survival (a key secondary end point) was assessed with the use of a hierarchical testing strategy to determine whether zanubrutinib was noninferior to ibrutinib. If noninferiority was established, the superiority of zanubrutinib was assessed and claimed if the two-sided P value was less than 0.05. RESULTS: mutation, or both, those who received zanubrutinib had longer progression-free survival than those who received ibrutinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.88); progression-free survival across other major subgroups consistently favored zanubrutinib. The percentage of patients with an overall response was higher in the zanubrutinib group than in the ibrutinib group. The safety profile of zanubrutinib was better than that of ibrutinib, with fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and fewer cardiac events, including fewer cardiac events leading to treatment discontinuation or death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received zanubrutinib than among those who received ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib was associated with fewer cardiac adverse events. (Funded by BeiGene; ALPINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03734016.).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

ABSTRACT Background Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterised by low platelet count. Treatment discontinuation or heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of ITP heightens the occurrence of relapsed or refractory ITP. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) has emerged as a promising target for autoimmune disorders. Case In this case series, we have explored the efficacy and safety of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) in treating relapsed/refractory ITP, by retrospective analysis of the diagnostic history and efficacy of four patients with relapsed/refractory ITP who attended the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and were treated with BTKi. All four patients received > 4 lines of ITP treatment and did not respond to splenectomy or other interventions before and after treatment with BTK inhibitor. After adjusting to the treatment with BTKi, one patient achieved a complete response, and two patients achieved a partial response. All three patients achieved sustained remission with platelet counts of > 50 × 10 9 /L maintained for 1045, 390 and 334 days, respectively. Another patient died of intracranial haemorrhage due to a decline in the platelet count after discontinuation of the drug, and the duration of sustained remission before discontinuation of the drug was 120 days. Four patients had no significant abnormalities in the functions of the liver and kidney monitored during the treatment period. Conclusion For patients with relapsed/refractory ITP, BTK inhibitor therapy can be considered as an option, with promising preliminary efficacy and safety. However, more clinical trials are needed to verify the exact data.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ABSTRACT: The ALPINE trial established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; here, we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.84), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). Although median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common nonhematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs 6 cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03734016.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

ABSTRACT: TP53-mutant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with poor survival outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study of zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (BOVen) in untreated patients with MCL with a TP53 mutation. Patients initially received 160 mg zanubrutinib twice daily and obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg was given on cycle 1 day 1, 8, and 15, and on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. After 2 cycles, venetoclax was added with weekly dose ramp-up to 400 mg daily. After 24 cycles, if patients were in complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) using an immunosequencing assay, treatment was discontinued. The primary end point was met if ≥11 patients were progression free at 2 years. The study included 25 patients with untreated MCL with a TP53 mutation. The best overall response rate was 96% (24/25) and the complete response rate was 88% (22/25). Frequency of uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-5 and uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-6 at cycle 13 was 95% (18/19) and 84% (16/19), respectively. With a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the 2-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were 72%, 91%, and 76%, respectively. Common side effects were generally low grade and included diarrhea (64%), neutropenia (32%), and infusion-related reactions (24%). BOVen was well tolerated and met its primary efficacy end point in TP53-mutant MCL. These data support its use and ongoing evaluation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03824483.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

ABSTRACT: The phase 3 ASPEN trial (NCT03053440) compared Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), zanubrutinib and ibrutinib, in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Post-hoc biomarker analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing on pretreatment bone marrow samples from 98 patients treated with zanubrutinib and 92 patients treated with ibrutinib with mutated (MUT) MYD88 and 20 patients with wild-type (WT) MYD88 treated with zanubrutinib. Of 329 mutations in 52 genes, mutations in CXCR4 (25.7%), TP53 (24.8%), ARID1A (15.7%), and TERT (9.0%) were most common. TP53MUT, ARID1AMUT, and TERTMUT were associated with higher rates of CXCR4MUT (P < .05). Patients with CXCR4MUT (frameshift or nonsense [NS] mutations) had lower very good partial response (VGPR) and complete response rates (CR; 17.0% vs 37.2%, P = .020) and longer time to response (11.1 vs 8.4 months) than patients with CXCR4WT treated with BTKis. CXCR4NS was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 3.39; P = .017) in patients treated with ibrutinib but not in those treated with zanubrutinib (HR, 0.67; P = .598), but VGPR + CR rates were similar between treatment groups (14.3% vs 15.4%). Compared with ibrutinib, patients with CXCR4NS treated with zanubrutinib had a favorable major response rate (MRR; 85.7% vs 53.8%; P = .09) and PFS (HR, 0.30; P = .093). In patients with TP53MUT, significantly lower MRRs were observed for patients treated with ibrutinib (63.6% vs 85.7%; P = .04) but not for those treated with zanubrutinib (80.8% vs 81.9%; P = .978). In TP53MUT, compared with ibrutinib, patients treated with zanubrutinib had higher VGPR and CR (34.6% vs 13.6%; P < .05), numerically improved MRR (80.8% vs 63.6%; P = .11), and longer PFS (not reached vs 44.2 months; HR, 0.66; P = .37). Collectively, patients with WM with CXCR4MUT or TP53MUT had worse prognosis compared with patients with WT alleles, and zanubrutinib led to better clinical outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND