Vitamin E 400unit / Selenium 100microgram capsules

Micronutrients and nutraceuticals play crucial roles in wound healing and tissue regeneration, supporting various physiological processes. This review aims to synthesize and evaluate the functions of various micronutrients and nutraceuticals, emphasizing the synergistic interactions among different nutrients that facilitate wound healing processes. A thorough literature review was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, to identify molecular studies, animal models, randomized controlled trials, and observational human studies published up to January 2000. Two independent reviewers screened the articles, extracted data, and evaluated the Risk of Bias using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for the 190 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests that bioactive compounds found in functional foods and dietary supplements can help prevent chronic conditions and promote wellness beyond basic nutrition. Vitamins A, C, and E, as well as minerals such as zinc, selenium, and iron, are essential for cell proliferation and the formation of new tissues. Additionally, nutraceuticals, including omega-3 fatty acids, glutamine, arginine, and polyphenols, exhibit anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which promote healing and reduce the risk of infection. Probiotics and other bioactive compounds in nutraceuticals contribute to maintaining the balance of microbiota, reducing inflammation, and stimulating cell regeneration. Significant variability was noted in study design, sample size, intervention dosage, and outcome measures. This evidence underscores the necessity for further well-designed clinical trials to determine the optimal dosages and combinations for specific wound types across diverse patient populations. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID: 1072091).

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background and Objectives: The significance of periodontal disease as a public health issue prompts the exploration of effective treatments, including the potential use of tocopherol (Vitamin E) due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Materials and Methods: The PICO statement (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) was as follows: In patients with periodontal disease, does tocopherol (Vitamin E) supplementation compared to no supplementation or insufficient Vitamin E intake improve clinical outcomes such as gingival inflammation, pocket depth, and clinical attachment levels? This study searched through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to June 2024 focused on studies involving human subjects with various forms of periodontal disease, analyzing the impact of tocopherol through dietary or supplementary intake. Primary outcomes evaluated included improvements in gingival inflammation, pocket depth, and clinical attachment levels, with data synthesis conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Quality assessment and risk of bias were meticulously performed for the included observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Results: The meta-analysis incorporated 8 studies that were used for data extraction, totaling 12,832 patients, revealing a heterogeneous response to tocopherol supplementation, with a pooled odds ratio for efficacy in reducing periodontal disease severity at about 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). Noteworthy findings indicated a statistically significant increase in clinical attachment loss and pocket depth with odds ratios ranging from 1.15 to 9.33 when Vitamin E was insufficient. However, the considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 88.35%) underscores variations in tocopherol's effectiveness across different populations and study designs. Conclusions: While tocopherol supplementation shows a modest benefit in managing periodontal disease, particularly in reducing clinical attachment levels and pocket depth, the variability in outcomes emphasizes the necessity for more research to establish standardized treatment protocols and dosages.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Cancer survivors experience a range of side effects during and after treatment. There is a need for a rigorous synthesis of the most recent and best available evidence on the role of nutritional supplements for supportive care in cancer, to inform shared decision-making. We searched 5 databases for umbrella reviews, meta-analyses and systematic reviews on nutritional supplements for supportive cancer care, excluding studies on pain, anxiety and depression, which are covered in recent guidelines. We found 52 reviews that reported on 250 RCTs on 18 supplements for 16 indications. Almost all reviews were of low/critically low quality (assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews version 2). There was moderate-certainty evidence for benefit from the following supplements: amino acids and oral proteolytic enzymes for severity of radiation-induced dermatitis, N-acetyl cysteine for prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in individuals with gastrointestinal cancers. There was low to very low certainty evidence that glutamine, zinc, probiotics and melatonin may be effective for oral mucositis; Vitamin E, omega-3 fatty acids, glutamine and other amino acids may be effective for preventing CIPN. Serious adverse events were reported for high-dose Vitamin A, and dose-related adverse events were reported with zinc and Vitamin E. However, the majority of nutritional supplements were associated with only minor adverse events. Due to the low to very low certainty of the majority of evidence, firm clinical recommendations cannot be made. Further research to conclusively evaluate benefit and harm, including potential impact on efficacy of standard treatments, should be conducted.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive, inflammatory airway disorder characterized by a gradual decline in lung function and increased oxidative stress. Both oxidative stress and inflammation are central to its pathophysiology, with trace elements such as zinc, copper, iron, manganese, magnesium, selenium, and calcium playing key roles in various cellular processes.ObjectiveThis article reviews the role of trace elements in COPD, focusing on their involvement in disease pathogenesis and their therapeutic potential. Specifically, we examine the effects of zinc, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, selenium, and calcium in COPD.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive narrative review of the literature across databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, identifying studies that explore the therapeutic effects of trace elements in COPD. The studies included in the review consisted of cohort analyses, randomized controlled trials, and clinical investigations.ResultsZinc, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, selenium, and calcium are critical to both the pathophysiology and management of COPD. These trace elements contribute to the regulation of inflammation, the modulation of oxidative stress, and the maintenance of lung function. Zinc and copper, for instance, reduce oxidative stress and modulate immune responses, while iron is essential for oxygen transport. Magnesium, manganese, selenium, and calcium are vital for muscle function, respiratory performance, reducing inflammation, and improving pulmonary function.ConclusionsThe minerals zinc, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, selenium, and calcium may contribute to beneficial effects as part of the standard therapeutic management of COPD. Maintaining optimal levels of these trace elements may support the regulation of inflammatory processes, a reduction in oxidative stress, and an improvement in the pulmonary function. However, further clinical research is necessary to confirm their efficacy and establish safe dosage recommendations in COPD treatment.

Abstract licence: CC BY