Verapamil 180mg modified-release / Trandolapril 2mg capsules

Background: Amlodipine has recently been incidentally reported with angioedema and is frequently prescribed with renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAAS-i) for hypertension management. While RAAS-i drugs are known to cause angioedema, the risk associated with amlodipine alone or in combination with RAAS-i drugs remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between amlodipine use and angioedema using pharmacovigilance data. Methods: We analyzed adverse event reports from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System using both frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Drug–drug interactions were assessed using multiplicative models. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of published case reports of amlodipine-associated angioedema. Results: Among 29,661,136 reports, 2076 cases of angioedema were identified (1067 with amlodipine alone, 1009 with amlodipine–RAAS-i combinations). Significant safety signals were detected for amlodipine alone and in combination with aliskiren, specific ACE inhibitors (quinapril, benazepril, trandolapril, fosinopril, perindopril), and certain ARBs (candesartan, losartan). No significant interactions were observed between amlodipine and RAAS-i drugs except for the amlodipine–trandolapril combination. A review of published cases demonstrated definite causality in two cases and possible association in others, with most patients presenting with oropharyngeal/facial edema and achieving complete recovery following drug discontinuation and standard therapy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a potentially increased risk of angioedema with amlodipine, both as monotherapy and in specific RAAS-i combinations. While these results should not discourage appropriate clinical use, they emphasize the importance of monitoring for angioedema, particularly during therapy initiation. The findings from this study need to be validated in prospective studies for further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Verapamil is a well-known drug used for treating angina and hypertension. Emerging data from current clinical trials suggest that this calcium channel blocker has a potential benefit for pancreatic β-cells through the elevation and sustenance of C-peptide levels in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). This is intriguing, given the fact that the current therapeutic options for DM are still limited to using insulin and incretins which, in fact, fail to address the underlying pathology of β-cell destruction and loss. Moreover, verapamil is widely available as an FDA-approved, cost-effective drug, supported also by its substantial efficacy and safety. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the β-cell protective potentials of verapamil are yet to be fully elucidated. Although, verapamil reduces the expression of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), a molecule which is involved in β-cell apoptosis and glucotoxicity-induced β-cell death, other signaling pathways are also modulated by verapamil. In this review, we revisit the historical avenues that lead to verapamil as a potential therapeutic agent for DM. Importantly, this review provides an update on the current known mechanisms of action of verapamil and also allude to the plausible mechanisms that could be implicated in its β-cell protective effects, based on our own research findings.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), originally developed for cardiovascular indications, have gained attention for their therapeutic potential in neuropsychiatric, endocrine, and pain-related disorders. In neuropsychiatry, nimodipine and isradipine, both L-type CCBs, show mood-stabilizing and neuroprotective effects, with possible benefits in depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. In endocrinology, verapamil, a non-dihydropyridine L-type blocker, has been associated with the preservation of pancreatic β-cell function and reduced insulin dependence in diabetes. CCBs may also aid in managing primary aldosteronism and pheochromocytoma, particularly in patients with calcium signaling mutations. In pain medicine, α2δ ligands and selective blockers of N-type and T-type channels demonstrate efficacy in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. However, their broader use is limited by challenges in central nervous system (CNS) penetration, off-target effects, and heterogeneous trial outcomes. Future research should focus on pharmacogenetic stratification, novel delivery platforms, and combination strategies to optimize repurposing of CCBs across disciplines.

Abstract licence: CC BY