Varicella immunoglobulin 250mg solution for injection vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Varicella-Zoster immunoglobulin
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Varicella-Zoster immunoglobulin on the MHRA register
Varicella-Zoster immunoglobulin human 250mg solution for injection vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 21 · Randomised trials: 4 · 1984–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Pourahmad M, Tarrahi MJ, Momenzadeh M, et al.
2025
- Herpesvirus 3, Human
- Chickenpox
- Varicella Zoster Virus Infection
Almeida IR, Belo CS, Sabatine TC, et al.
2026
Infection by the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) during pregnancy is uncommon but clinically relevant, since it may compromise both the mother and the fetus. Although varicella is generally benign and self-limited in childhood, the physiological and immunological changes in pregnancy predispose individuals to more severe forms of the disease, with pneumonia representing the main maternal complication and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Vertical transmission may result in congenital varicella syndrome, the most severe fetal consequence, whose risk is greatest between the 13th and 20th weeks of gestation, or in severe neonatal varicella when maternal infection occurs in the peripartum period. This article presents a narrative review of the literature. To enhance methodological transparency and reproducibility, key principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were applied to the literature search and study selection process. Searches were conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and SciELO databases, and 32 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. The review addresses the virology, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of VZV infection, including differences between temperate and tropical regions, as well as its clinical manifestations and maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications. Diagnosis is predominantly clinical, with the polymerase chain reaction being the most sensitive and specific confirmatory method and serology being useful mainly for the assessment of maternal immunity. Management encompasses the assessment of susceptibility, post-exposure prophylaxis according to current guideline recommendations, and early antiviral treatment of established infection. Preconception and postpartum vaccination remain the main preventive strategies. Despite recent advances, important gaps persist regarding prophylactic strategies and the long-term safety of antivirals during pregnancy.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Erin M. Rice, Smathorn Thakolwiboon, M. Avila
Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2021
Ling-Xian Qiu, Hong-Xing Pan, Qi Liang, et al.
The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2026
- Chickenpox
- Viral Proteins
- Chickenpox Vaccine
Habib MA, Hughes T, Huang LM, et al.
2026
- Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
- Chickenpox Vaccine
- Immunogenicity, Vaccine
Two-dose childhood vaccination against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella is widely recommended. Quadrivalent (MMRV) vaccines can be used for one or both immunizations against these diseases. In some countries, e.g. the United States, only one MMRV vaccine is licensed. Availability of another MMRV vaccine could strengthen supply resilience, optimal vaccine coverage, and disease control. In this phase II, single-blind, multi-country study, healthy children aged 4-6 y, previously primed with a first dose of any combination of measles/mumps/rubella/varicella-containing vaccine(s) in their second year of life, were randomized 2:2:2:1:1 to receive one dose of a GSK investigational MMRV (MMRVNS; three formulations) or a licensed MMRV vaccine (two lots). Immunogenicity was assessed at Day 43 post-vaccination. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded up to Day 4 (solicited administration-site and systemic AEs), Day 43 (solicited systemic and unsolicited AEs), and Day 181 (serious AEs [SAEs]) post-vaccination. Of 801 participants enrolled, 796 were vaccinated and 765 completed the study. Antigen-specific antibody geometric mean concentrations and seroresponse rates were generally comparable between MMRVNS (regardless of formulation) and MMRV recipients. Administration-site pain (29.0%-39.0% of participants) and systemic drowsiness (9.0%-15.9%) were the most common solicited AEs. Unsolicited AEs (mostly upper respiratory tract infections) were reported in 18.5%-27.2% of participants. At least one SAE (none considered vaccine-related) occurred in each group. Except for one reported fatality, all SAEs resolved. Compared to the licensed standard-of-care MMRV vaccine, the investigational MMRVNS formulations generated comparable immune responses and had a similarly acceptable safety profile, when administered as second dose. These results support further clinical development of MMRVNS.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Nisa, Lluís, Landis, Basile Nicolas, Leuchter, Igor, et al.
Mosby, 2013
A. Hata, Taisei Ishioka, K. Oishi, et al.
Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2019
E. Miller, J. Cradock-Watson, M. Ridehalgh
Lancet, 1989
Shadravan MM, Farshchian F, Rajaei A, et al.
2025
IntroductionAcute transverse myelitis (ATM) is a rare inflammatory disorder that affects the spinal cord, leading to sudden weakness, sensory deficits, and bowel/bladder dysfunction. Also rare, this condition can be caused by infections such as the Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) or can occur as a complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It has been reported to be more prevalent in SLE patients compared to VZV infections. We present a case of a patient with a history of SLE and evidence of vesicular rash from VZV infection.Case reportA 61-year-old female presented with progressive weakness in her lower limbs. Two weeks before, she had developed a vesicular rash due to a VZV infection in the T6-T9 dermatomes, which was followed by paraparesis, sensory loss, and urinary retention. She also had a history of SLE. During the physical examination, muscle strength and sensation were decreased in the lower limbs. MRI revealed central myelopathy from T6 to T10. In laboratory tests, VZV PCR was positive, and Aquaporin-4 was also negative. The patient was treated with IV corticosteroid pulse and ganciclovir, followed by plasma exchange. resulted in partial recovery.ConclusionsThis case highlights VZV-induced TM (VZV-TM) in an immunocompromised patient with underlying SLE. Despite overlapping etiologies, a thorough clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evaluation, including a positive CSF VZV PCR and the absence of a SLE flare, supported VZV-TM as the final diagnosis. Prompt antiviral therapy and escalation to plasma exchange led to substantial neurological recovery.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Zhijiao Song, Ruohao Li, Lantao Liang, et al.
Virology Journal, 2026
- Herpesvirus 3, Human
- Myelitis
- Herpes Zoster
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.