Tuberculin purified protein derivative (RT 23) 100 tuberculin units/ml solution for injection 1.5ml vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) is a sterile aqueous solution of a purified protein fraction for intradermal administration as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Tuberculin purified protein derivative
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Tuberculin purified protein derivative
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Tuberculin purified protein derivative on the MHRA register
Tuberculin PPD RT 23 SSI 100 tuberculin units/ml solution for injection 1.5ml vials
Tuberculin purified protein derivative (RT 23) 100 tuberculin units/ml solution for injection 1.5ml vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 16 · Randomised trials: 10 · 1973–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Y. Hamada, Rishi K. Gupta, Matteo Quartagno, et al.
eClinicalMedicine, 2023
M. Krutikov, L. Faust, V. Nikolayevskyy, et al.
The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021
Irshad T, Ali S, Usman M, et al.
2026
- Warts
- Acyclovir
- Antiviral Agents
BackgroundCutaneous warts are exophytic, benign proliferative lesions caused by human papillomavirus infection of basal keratinocytes. Many intralesional immunomodulatory agents are used by dermatologists these days including Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, purified protein derivative (PPD), Candida extract, vitamin D3, interferon alpha, zinc sulphate, and hepatitis B vaccine. Intralesional acyclovir is considered a novel intralesional therapy for warts as it directly destroys the viral cells. The objectives of this study are to provide the latest comparison among different intralesional therapies and to specifically compare acyclovir with PPD.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy was implemented to identify relevant randomized controlled trials, and those with single-arm studies were excluded. After this, 5 studies were finally included in the review. Statistical analysis was done using a frequentist random-effects model. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed using odds ratio and 95% confidence interval with statistical significance set as P-value ResultsUse of saline had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving a complete response (probability to be the best 96%, P-score = .96) and partial response (98% probability, P-score = .98) when compared with other modalities. The forest plot shows no statistically significant differences among the treatment arms except for saline (P ConclusionThis network's meta-analysis concludes the superiority of intralesional saline in achieving response to treatment when compared with other modalities such as cryotherapy and vaccines. A higher risk of adverse events was noted on use of vaccines. Future research is needed to strengthen these findings.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Tobaiqi MA, Alshamrani MN, Sriram S, et al.
2025
Background: The world health goal of eliminating tuberculosis (TB) is heavily hinged on timely and efficient diagnosis and treatment. The interferon-γ release assays (I.G.R.A.s) can diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and offer an alternative to the centuries-old tuberculin skin test (T.S.T.). Yet there is disagreement over replacing the T.S.T. with I.G.R.A.s as a standard tool. Objective: We aim to assess the diagnostic ability of I.G.R.A.s compared with T.S.T. for detecting active TB cases. Methods: A systematic review identified relevant studies from four databases. In the diagnostic meta-analysis conducted with OpenMeta Analyst software, we calculated the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) for active TB detection via I.G.R.A. and T.S.T. methods compared to TB culture. Results included pooled estimates for SN and SP with 95% confidence intervals (CI), stratified by age, immunity, I.G.R.A. type, and T.S.T. cut-off. Results: Our meta-analysis revealed that TB diagnosis using T.S.T. showed an SN of 72.4% and SP of 79.3%, while I.G.R.A. demonstrated higher accuracy with an SN of 78.9% and SP of 85.7%. Subgroup analysis by age indicated that I.G.R.A. consistently outperformed T.S.T. in both adult and pediatric populations. Among immunocompromised individuals, T.S.T. had low SN (23%) but high SP (91.2%), whereas I.G.R.A. had higher SN (65.6%) but lower SP (81.9%). Immunocompetent subjects showed that T.S.T. had SN of 72% and SP of 87.3%, while I.G.R.A. had higher SN (82.9%) and SP (89.1%). Evaluation by I.G.R.A. type revealed that T-SPOT.GIT demonstrated a higher SN but lower SP compared to QFT-GIT. Assessing T.S.T. cut-offs, SP was highest (88.8%) at ≥15 mm, while SN peaked (71.6%) at ≥5 mm. Conclusions: I.G.R.A. consistently showed higher diagnostic accuracy than T.S.T. across most studied subgroups, indicating its potential superiority in active TB diagnosis.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Lara Goscé, Kasim Allel, Yohhei Hamada, et al.
PLOS Global Public Health, 2024
Rana N, Noseworthy R, Jabbour E, et al.
2026
BackgroundWe aimed to estimate the sensitivity of skin and blood-based tuberculosis (TB) infection tests and assess variation in sensitivity by test type and population characteristics.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of studies involving individuals with microbiologically confirmed TB disease (surrogate reference standard) who underwent TB infection testing. Searches were performed across databases up to February 24, 2025. Data were extracted using a standardized form and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Primary analyses focused on tests performed before or during TB disease treatment.ResultsFrom 103 031 records, 307 studies were included: 110 evaluated tuberculin skin testing (TST), 185 QuantiFERON (QFT), 107 T-SPOT.TB, 10 antigen-based skin tests, and 5 TB-IGRA. Sensitivity was consistently lower among people with HIV. Among populations without vs with HIV, respectively, TST ≥5 mm sensitivity was 80.3% (95% CI, 73.7%-85.5%) and 53.6% (95% CI, 41.5%-65.4%), TST ≥10 mm sensitivity was 75.1% (95% CI, 68.8%-80.5%) and 64.5% (95% CI, 36.8%-85.0%), antigen-based skin test sensitivity was 77.7% (95% CI, 69.7%-84%) and 61.3% (95% CI, 39.6%-79.3%), QFT sensitivity was 82.6% (95% CI, 80.7%-84.3%) and 66.5% (95% CI, 59.8%-72.6%), and T-SPOT.TB sensitivity was 88.2% (95% CI, 86.2%-90.0%) and 69% (95% CI, 56.6%-79.2%). TB-IGRA was only evaluated in populations without HIV (sensitivity, 85.4%; 95% CI, 81.3%-88.7%). Sensitivity in other populations targeted for TB infection testing generally fell between estimates among people with and without HIV. In comparative analyses, TST ≥5 mm and TST ≥10 mm had comparable sensitivity to QFT; however, T-SPOT.TB had superior sensitivity to both TST ≥5 mm and QFT.ConclusionsTB infection test sensitivity varies by test type and population. All tests showed reduced sensitivity in people with HIV. T-SPOT.TB demonstrated the highest sensitivity across populations.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Abu-Zaid A, Hilali S, Albasheer Z, et al.
2026
Background: Cutaneous warts, caused by HPV, are common, and conventional destructive treatments often fail to prevent recurrence. Intralesional immunotherapy offers a promising alternative. Specifically, purified protein derivative (PPD) and vitamin D have demonstrated efficacy; however, a direct comparison of their therapeutic value and safety profiles is needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional PPD versus intralesional Vitamin D for cutaneous warts. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was conducted for RCTs up to November 2025. Primary outcomes were the complete and partial clinical response rates of warts. Secondary outcomes included recurrence and adverse events. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values were pooled using STATA 19.5. Results: Seven RCTs involving 520 patients were included. The analysis found no significant difference in the rate of complete clinical response (RR: 1.07, 95% CI [0.95, 1.21]; p = 0.24) or partial clinical response (RR: 0.90, 95% CI [0.56, 1.46]; p = 0.68) between the two groups. Also, the two groups showed no significant difference in recurrence rate (RR: 1.14, 95% CI [0.48, 2.68]; p = 0.77). Regarding safety, PPD was associated with a significantly higher risk of injection site erythema (RR: 4.76, 95% CI [2.08, 10.93]; p p = 0.01). Still, no significant differences were found for injection site pain (p = 0.12) or swelling (p = 0.68). Conclusions: With uncertain evidence, intralesional PPD and vitamin D demonstrate comparable overall efficacy in clearing cutaneous warts. However, PPD carries a higher risk of systemic adverse events (fever) and injection site erythema, with a more effective potential to clear distant warts. The choice between the two agents should be based on the clinical profile and patient preference.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Souza F, Steffen R, Pinto M, et al.
2026
BackgroundThe World Health Organization has recommended three new tuberculosis (TB) antigen-based skin tests (TBST) (Diaskintest®, C-TST®, Cy-TB®) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection (TBI). Household contacts (HHC) of people with pulmonary TB are at increased risk for TBI. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the use of TBST and of QuantiFERON-TB Plus® (QFT-Plus®) compared to the tuberculin skin test (TST) in Brazil.MethodsA state-transition Markov model simulating four distinct hypothetical cohorts of 10,000 HIV-negative contacts of different ages (3 months-4 years, 5-9 years, 10-14 years, and 15 or older) was built over five annual cycles for TBI testing and tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) under the Brazilian public health system perspective. Effectiveness was estimated from systematic reviews and costs were raised from the Brazilian government (TST and QFT-Plus®) and from the manufacturers (TBST). Incremental cost-effectiveness per TB case averted was calculated.FindingsTBST has similar accuracy to QFT-Plus®, and all are more specific than TST. TBST are less costly compared with TST or QFT-Plus®. All TBST were cost-saving regardless of the age group compared to TST or QFT-Plus®. Cy-Tb® was the most cost-saving, followed by Diaskintest® and C-TST®.InterpretationThe incorporation of the new TBST for screening in the Brazilian public health system would be a cost-saving alternative for contacts. Because these tests require the same infrastructure and human resources skills as TST, the tests could be readily implemented.FundingCNPq and Stop TB Partnership.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Andryszkiewicz W, Bodziony M, Chmielewska M, et al.
2026
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Tuberculosis
- Hypersensitivity, Delayed
Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTb) antigens is a crucial component of the cellular immune response presented during tuberculosis infection. This reaction is driven primarily by T lymphocytes, which recognize mycobacterial antigens and trigger a focused inflammatory cascade. Cytokines produced by T lymphocytes stimulate the formation of granulomas, organized structures that help contain the bacteria and prevent their spread. DTH is essential for controlling the infection and forms the basis of diagnostic tools, including the still widely practiced tuberculin skin test despite its limitations. This immunological mechanism is also used as an important therapeutic target in the treatment of tuberculosis by modulating the cellular response. These approaches include immunomodulatory agents, therapeutic vaccines and host-directed treatment. Ongoing research offers promising opportunities for future interventions aimed at decreasing the global mortality associated with tuberculosis.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Cai S, Xia Y, Zhou Y, et al.
2026
- BCG Vaccine
- Tuberculin Test
- Latent Tuberculosis
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
When exposed to *M. tuberculosis* antigen, the sensitization initiates in the re…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:17889651 PMID:21078852
Acts via MYD88 and TRAF6, leading to NF-kappa-B activation, cytokine secretion and the inflammatory response. May also activate immune cells and promote apoptosis in response to the lipid moiety of lipoproteins .
PMID:10426995 PMID:10426996
Recognizes mycoplasmal macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2kD (MALP-2), soluble tuberculosis factor (STF), phenol-soluble modulin (PSM) and B.burgdorferi outer surface protein A lipoprotein (OspA-L) cooperatively with TLR6 .
PMID:11441107
Stimulation of monocytes in vitro with M.tuberculosis PstS1 induces p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 activation primarily via this receptor, but also partially via TLR4 .
PMID:16622205
MAPK activation in response to bacterial peptidoglycan also occurs via this receptor .
PMID:16622205
Acts as a receptor for M.tuberculosis lipoproteins LprA, LprG, LpqH and PstS1, some lipoproteins are dependent on other coreceptors (TLR1, CD14 and/or CD36); the lipoproteins act as agonists to modulate antigen presenting cell functions in response to the pathogen .
PMID:19362712
M.tuberculosis HSP70 (dnaK) but not HSP65 (groEL-2) acts via this protein to stimulate NF-kappa-B expression .
PMID:15809303
Recognizes M.tuberculosis major T-antigen EsxA (ESAT-6) which inhibits downstream MYD88-dependent signaling (shown in mouse) (By similarity).
Forms activation clusters composed of several receptors depending on the ligand, these clusters trigger signaling from the cell surface and subsequently are targeted to the Golgi in a lipid-raft dependent pathway. Forms the cluster TLR2:TLR6:CD14:CD36 in response to diacylated lipopeptides and TLR2:TLR1:CD14 in response to triacylated lipopeptides .
PMID:16880211
Required for normal uptake of M.tuberculosis, a process that is inhibited by M.tuberculosis LppM (By similarity)
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Tuberculin purified protein derivative
Additional database identifiers
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72