Trometamol 7.2% solution for infusion 10ml ampoules
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
An organic amine proton acceptor.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Trometamol
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Trometamol
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Trometamol
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 12 · Randomised trials: 19 · 1992–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
F. Wagenlehner, D. Abramov-Sommariva, Martina Höller, et al.
Urologia Internationalis, 2018
Abdelmonem H, Abdelhay HM, Abdelwadoud GT, et al.
2023
- Metoclopramide
- Migraine Disorders
- Headache
BackgroundMany drugs are prescribed in relieving acute migraine attacks, we aim to compare metoclopramide with other antimigraine drugs.MethodsWe searched online databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science till June 2022 for RCTs that compared metoclopramide alone with placebo or active drugs. The main outcomes were the mean change in headache score and complete headache relief. The secondary outcomes were the rescue medications need, side effects, nausea and recurrence rate. We qualitatively reviewed the outcomes. Then, we performed the network meta-analyses (NMAs) when it was possible. which were done by the Frequentist method using the MetaInsight online software.ResultsSixteen studies were included with a total of 1934 patients: 826 received metoclopramide, 302 received placebo, and 806 received other active drugs. Metoclopramide was effective in reducing headache outcomes even for 24 h. The intravenous route was the most chosen route in the included studies and showed significant positive results regarding headache outcomes; however, the best route whether intramuscular, intravenous, or suppository was not compared in the previous studies. Also, both 10 and 20 mg doses of metoclopramide were effective in improving headache outcomes; however, there was no direct comparison between both doses and the 10 mg dose was the most frequently used dosage. In NMA of headache change after 30 min or 1 h, metoclopramide effect came after granisetron, ketorolac, chlorpromazine, and Dexketoprofen trometamol. Only granisetron's effect was significantly higher than metoclopramide's effect which was only significantly higher than placebo and sumatriptan. In headache-free symptoms, only prochlorperazine was non-significantly higher than metoclopramide which was higher than other medications and showed significantly higher effects only with placebo. In rescue medication, metoclopramide's effect was only non-significantly lower than prochlorperazine and chlorpromazine while its effect was higher than other drugs and showed higher significant effects only than placebo and valproate. In the recurrence rate, studies showed no significant difference between metoclopramide and other drugs. Metoclopramide significantly decreased nausea more than the placebo. Regarding side effects, metoclopramide showed a lower incidence of mild side effects than pethidine and chlorpromazine and showed a higher incidence of mild side effects than placebo, dexamethasone, and ketorolac. The reported extrapyramidal symptoms with metoclopramide were dystonia or akathisia.ConclusionA dose of 10 mg IV Metoclopramide was effective in relieving migraine attacks with minimal side effects. Compared to other active drugs, it only showed a lower significant effect compared with granisetron regarding headache change while it showed significantly higher effects only with placebo in both rescue medication needs and headache-free symptoms and valproate in only rescue medication need. Also, it significantly decreased headache scores more than placebo and sumatriptan. However, more studies are needed to support our results.
Abstract licence: CC BY
T. Cai, I. Tamanini, C. Tascini, et al.
Journal of Urology, 2020
D. Freitas, D. Moreira
Arab Journal of Urology, 2019
Jesús Sojo-Dorado, I. López-Hernández, A. Hernández-Torres, et al.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2023
- Escherichia coli Infections
- Urinary Tract Infections
- Fosfomycin
Mahmut Erkal, C. Eroğlu
Head & Face Medicine, 2025
- Molar, Third
- Tooth, Impacted
- Tromethamine
Senol A, Arslan S, Can NO, et al.
2025
- Water
- Tromethamine
- Ketoprofen
Angkanavisan K, Sakboonyarat B, Ungthammakhun C
2026
- Urinary Tract Infections
- Carbapenems
- Fosfomycin
ObjectivesTo determine whether oral fosfomycin trometamol is noninferior to carbapenem continuation as step-down therapy for cUTIs caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales.MethodsIn this open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial, adults with 3GCRE cUTIs who received 3 days of intravenous carbapenem were assigned to oral fosfomycin trometamol or continued carbapenem to complete 7 days. The primary outcome was day-7 clinical cure; secondary outcomes included day-28 clinical and microbiological cure, readmission, and length of stay.ResultsA total of 124 participants were enrolled (62 per group). The mean age was 73 years, 62.1% were female, and Escherichia coli accounted for 91% of isolates. Clinical cure at day 7 occurred in 98.4% in both groups (risk difference 0.0; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.04). Clinical cure at day 28 was also similar (91.9% in each group). Microbiological cure at day 7 was 100% with fosfomycin and 98.1% with carbapenem, and at day 28 was 90.3% and 85.5%, respectively. Hospital stay was shorter with fosfomycin (7.9 vs 12.0 days).ConclusionsOral fosfomycin trometamol as step-down therapy was comparable to continued carbapenem therapy for cUTIs caused by 3GCRE and significantly reduced hospital stay, supporting role of carbapenem-sparing option.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Forestier E, Soudais B, Caspar Y, et al.
2026
The management of male urinary tract infections (UTIs) has historically been based on a monolithic approach, under which every episode was treated as acute prostatitis, leading to prolonged antibiotic courses. To address rising bacterial resistance and promote antimicrobial stewardship, the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) updated its guidelines in 2026, introducing a stratified management framework. This review outlines the scientific evidence underlying these updated recommendations. A comprehensive review of recent literature, including randomized controlled trials and large-scale retrospective cohorts, was conducted so as to evaluate antibiotic efficacy, resistance patterns, and optimal treatment durations for male cystitis, febrile UTIs (prostatitis/pyelonephritis), and acute epididymo-orchitis. Evidence validates distinguishing male cystitis from febrile UTI. For male cystitis, 7-day regimens using narrow-spectrum oral agents-such as fosfomycin trometamol, nitrofurantoin, or pivmecillinam-achieve satisfactory clinical success with minimal risk of complications. Conversely, febrile UTIs require initial parenteral third-generation cephalosporins or oral fluoroquinolones. For targeted oral step-down therapy in prostatitis, cotrimoxazole is preferred over fluoroquinolones so as to minimize ecological impact, while amoxicillin remains the drug of choice for enterococcal coverage. Although recent data show that seven days can be sufficient for selected bacteremic presentations, to prevent relapses a conventional 14-day duration remains the standard for acute prostatitis. Non-sexually transmitted orchitis and epididymitis require a 10-day course of fluoroquinolones or cotrimoxazole. The 2026 SPILF guidelines represent a paradigm shift toward a tailored, stratified approach.
Abstract licence: CC BY
A. Erdil, N. Akbulut, A. Altan, et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Not available
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
2 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 1 of 1 interactions
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:25122912
Involved in cell mobility and transcription regulation through protein-protein interactions. Can promote transcription activation through binding to APBB1-KAT5 and inhibits Notch signaling through interaction with Numb.
Couples to apoptosis-inducing pathways such as those mediated by G(o) and JIP. Inhibits G(o) alpha ATPase activity (By similarity). Acts as a kinesin I membrane receptor, mediating the axonal transport of beta-secretase and presenilin 1 (By similarity).
By acting as a kinesin I membrane receptor, plays a role in axonal anterograde transport of cargo towards synapses in axons .
PMID:17062754 PMID:23011729
Involved in copper homeostasis/oxidative stress through copper ion reduction. In vitro, copper-metallated APP induces neuronal death directly or is potentiated through Cu(2+)-mediated low-density lipoprotein oxidation. Can regulate neurite outgrowth through binding to components of the extracellular matrix such as heparin and collagen I and IV.
The splice isoforms that contain the BPTI domain possess protease inhibitor activity. Induces a AGER-dependent pathway that involves activation of p38 MAPK, resulting in internalization of amyloid-beta peptide and leading to mitochondrial dysfunction in cultured cortical neurons. Provides Cu(2+) ions for GPC1 which are required for release of nitric oxide (NO) and subsequent degradation of the heparan sulfate chains on GPC1
ATC B05XX02
ATC B05BB03
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Tromethamine
Matched from: Trometamol
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
13337
ChemSpider
6257
PDB
TRS
ZINC
ZINC000000896695
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:457
GenAtlas
AMD1
GeneCards
AMD1
GenBank Gene Database
M21154
GenBank Protein Database
178518
UniProt Accession
DCAM_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:620
GenAtlas
APP
GeneCards
APP
GenBank Gene Database
X06989
UniProt Accession
A4_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72