Tramadol 75mg / Paracetamol 650mg tablets
Some safe custody exemptions; written records required
Legal requirements and restrictions
Schedule 3 medicines that do not require locked storage or register entries.
Legal requirements
- Prescriptions valid for 28 days
- No controlled drugs register required
- No safe custody (locked storage) required
Other medicines in this category
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Tramadol + Paracetamol
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(2)
Caesarean birth (NG192)
Osteoarthritis in over 16s: diagnosis and management (NG226)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 13 · Randomised trials: 36 · 2000–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Rudolf Duehmke, Sheena Derry, Philip J Wiffen, et al.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Neuralgia
Ewan D McNicol, McKenzie Ferguson, Simon Haroutounian, et al.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016
- Acetaminophen
- Analgesics
- Injections, Intravenous
Weiya Zhang, A Jones, M Doherty
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2004
- Acetaminophen
- Osteoarthritis
- Patient Satisfaction
M. Soledad Cepeda, Francisco Camargo, Carlota Zea, et al.
PubMed, 2007
- Acetaminophen
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Osteoarthritis
Ulderico Freo, Chiara Ruocco, Alessandra Valerio, et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021
Zachodnik J, Bech-Azeddine R, Sandberg M, et al.
2026
- Lumbar Vertebrae
- Analgesics
- Diskectomy
BackgroundInadequate postoperative pain management after lumbar discectomy may delay recovery, increase the risk of chronic pain, and prolong hospitalization. Effective analgesic strategies must balance pain control with minimal adverse effects.ObjectiveTo identify the most effective postoperative analgesic interventions for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy.Databases and data treatmentThis systematic review was preregistered in PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials were identified through systematic searches in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was opioid consumption within 24 h postoperatively. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan, with Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to adjust for random errors. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE.ResultsA total of 76 RCTs comprising 5617 participants were included, covering 11 analgesic strategies. Paracetamol, NSAIDs, epidural and intrathecal anaesthetics, local infiltration, nerve blocks, gabapentin, and pregabalin significantly reduced 24-h opioid consumption. Several interventions-including paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, ketamine, epidural and intrathecal anaesthetics, local anaesthetics, nerve blocks, gabapentin, and pregabalin-were also associated with lower pain scores at 6 and 24 h. However, evidence certainty ranged from low to very low due to methodological limitations, small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and inconsistent baseline analgesia.ConclusionsMultiple analgesic strategies show potential for reducing opioid use and improving early postoperative pain control after lumbar discectomy. Nevertheless, the low certainty of evidence highlights the urgent need for high-quality, standardized trials to inform clinical practice.SignificanceThe findings demonstrate that the following analgesics significantly reduce supplemental opioid consumption and pain levels in the immediate postoperative period: PCM, NSAIDs, intrathecal anaesthetics, epidural anaesthetics, LIA/wound infiltration, nerve blockade, gabapentin, and pregabalin. However, the high risk of bias and low quality of evidence in many of the included trials necessitate cautious interpretation of the findings.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Kelidari K, Samani D
2026
- Analgesics
- Root Canal Therapy
- Postoperative Pain
BACKGROUND: Post-endodontic pain is a common complication that negatively impacts patients’ daily lives. Single-dose oral analgesics are often prescribed after non-surgical root canal treatments to manage discomfort; however, their relative efficacy remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different single-dose postoperative medications for pain relief following root canal treatment (RCT). METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to February 2025 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single-dose postoperative analgesics with placebo in patients undergoing non-surgical endodontic treatment. Pain outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scales (VAS) at 6–8, 12, and 24 h post-treatment. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Pairwise and frequentist network meta-analyses were performed, and treatments were ranked using P-scores. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were qualitatively analyzed, while five of them were eligible for quantitative analyses and were included in our meta-analysis. They were from four countries with a combined sample size of 347 participants. At 6–8 h, Diclofenac + Acetaminophen provided the greatest pain reduction (MD: -6.28, 95% CI: -11.99 to -0.56), followed by Novafen and Ibuprofen + Acetaminophen. At 12 and 24 h, Novafen and Naproxen consistently demonstrated superior analgesic effects, whereas Tramadol and Ibuprofen offered moderate relief. Ibuprofen combinations with Acetaminophen or Alprazolam showed variable efficacy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose oral medications administered after non-surgical root canal treatments effectively reduce post-endodontic pain. Diclofenac + Acetaminophen is most effective for immediate short-term relief, while Novafen and Naproxen provide sustained efficacy at later time points. These results can guide clinicians in selecting optimal single-dose medications for post-RCT pain management. Keywords: postoperative endodontic pain; network meta-analysis; pain management; endodontic treatment TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Xu S, Song Z, Wang D, et al.
2026
BackgroundSerotonin syndrome (SS) is a potentially life-threatening condition increasingly driven by complex drug-drug interactions (DDIs) as serotonergic agents expand beyond psychiatry into pain management and infectious disease treatment. Current clinical decision support tools often exhibit inconsistencies in detecting these risks, leading to potential under-recognition of severe interactions.ObjectivesThis study aimed to detect and validate clinically significant DDIs associated with SS by integrating multisource real-world data. We sought to identify high-priority drug combinations, evaluate the concordance of major DDI checking tools, and highlight critical information gaps to improve patient safety strategies.DesignA multisource, retrospective study combining a systematic literature review, a disproportionality analysis of spontaneous adverse event reports, and a comparative cross-sectional evaluation of online DDI databases.MethodsThis study employed a multisource approach to detect and evaluate SS-related DDIs. We integrated findings from a systematic literature review (up to June 2025), a disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) with four frequency statistical models, and a comparative assessment of five major DDI checkers (Micromedex, Lexi-Interact, Epocrates, Medscape, and Drugs.com).ResultsThe systematic review identified high-risk interactions involving not only antidepressants but also non-psychotropic drugs such as linezolid, fentanyl, and methylene blue. FAERS data revealed strong signals for combinations such as linezolid-sertraline and fentanyl-venlafaxine, indicating a rising trend in SS reporting over the past two decades. Evaluation of DDI checkers demonstrated significant discrepancies in sensitivity and severity grading. Notably, 10.16% were not indexed in any of the five databases, including several clinically documented DDIs (e.g., aripiprazole-paracetamol and trazodone-pantoprazole), highlighting critical information gaps.ConclusionSS remains a significant clinical risk driven by increasingly complex polypharmacy. Relying on a single DDI checker may lead to an underestimation of risk due to inconsistent indexing and severity ratings. Hospital pharmacists should integrate multisource data and maintain high clinical vigilance, particularly for "hidden" serotonergic agents such as certain opioids and antibiotics, to ensure medication safety.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
M. Soledad Cepeda, Francisco Camargo, Carlota Zea, et al.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006
- Acetaminophen
- Osteoarthritis
- Tramadol
Iolter Cattabriga, Davide Pacini, Gaia Lamazza, et al.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Acetaminophen
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.