Tildrakizumab 200mg/2ml solution for injection pre-filled syringes

IntroductionModerate-to-severe plaque psoriasis is a chronic disease impacting quality of life (QoL). This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared efficacy and safety of all biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis to better inform providers on mid-term outcomes, with a focus on the interleukin-23 p19 inhibitor tildrakizumab.MethodsMEDLINE®, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCT) from inception through January 2024. RCTs comparing biologics against placebo or each other reporting Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1, or Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1 responses and safety outcomes (adverse events [AEs] or serious AEs [SAEs]) were sought. Bayesian NMAs were performed at week 28 as the primary time point of interest. Analyses were also performed at weeks 12 and 16. Findings were expressed as risk ratios (RR; efficacy outcomes), risk differences (RD; safety outcomes), and numbers needed to treat (NNT) with 95% credible intervals.ResultsOf 7418 publications screened, 187 describing 124 RCTs of 12 biologics were included in the systematic literature review, and 103 RCTs were included for NMA. All treatments demonstrated improved efficacy and QoL vs. placebo at week 28. Tildrakizumab efficacy at week 28 was comparable to risankizumab and guselkumab, respectively, for PASI 75 (RR 8.74 vs. 8.92 and 8.91), PASI 90 (RR 14.09 vs. 14.81 and 14.77), and PGA 0/1 (RR 9.34 vs. 10.29 and 10.23). No biologics exhibited an increased risk of SAEs vs. placebo; tildrakizumab exhibited no increased risk vs. placebo for AEs.ConclusionsThe investigated biologics demonstrated improved efficacy and QoL relative to placebo at week 28, with no increased risk of SAEs vs. placebo through week 16. At week 28, efficacy of tildrakizumab, risankizumab, and guselkumab was comparable. Limitations include lack of placebo comparators after week 12 or 16, which could affect results.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Expanding the systemic treatment options for patients with psoriasis, deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor is approved in the United States, European Union, China, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and other countries for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Evidence suggests the comparative efficacy of systemic therapies may be different in Asian versus White patients. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the clinical efficacy associated with deucravacitinib and other biologic or non-biologic systemic treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Asian populations. Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized trials of the interventions of interest. Multinomial random effects models adjusting for baseline placebo risk were used to estimate Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses at weeks 10-16. Of 8596 studies identified, 20 were included in the NMA. The estimated PASI 75 and 90 (95% credible interval) response rates for deucravacitinib were estimated to be 66% (49%-80%) and 40% (24%-58%) in Asian populations, notably higher than placebo (6% [4%-9%] and 1% [0.8-2%]) and apremilast (24% [12%-40%] and 9% [4%-20%]). No statistically significant difference was observed in PASI 75 and 90 responses between deucravacitinib and adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, infliximab, ustekinumab, and tildrakizumab. Deucravacitinib demonstrated robust efficacy in the Asian population, with PASI 75 and 90 responses comparable to some biologics. Deucravacitinib provides a convenient oral therapy with efficacy similar to several biologic therapies.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that impacts both the skin and joints. Currently, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors have become integral components of PsA treatment regimens. Nevertheless, the comparative effectiveness of these IL-targeted therapies remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study employs a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach to systematically evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles of various IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify eligible research articles. This NMA was implemented by Stata 14.0 software, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) serving as effect and safety measures to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety profiles. Drugs were ranked based on their efficacy and safety profiles using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, enabling a comprehensive comparative assessment of interventional strategies. The CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) online tool was utilized to evaluate the confidence level of the NMA results.ResultsThis NMA included 22 RCTs and 9,241 patients. All intervention groups demonstrated superior efficacy to the placebo group. Based on efficacy endpoints and subgroup analyses, bimekizumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab exhibited superior short-term efficacy. Notably, subgroup analyses suggested that tildrakizumab may represent a promising therapeutic option for PsA. Regarding safety and the risk of adverse events, all treatments demonstrated no significant differences compared to placebo, except bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.74). There were no significant differences in terms of serious adverse events and upper respiratory tract infection. Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W showed heightened risk of nasopharyngitis (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.26-4.22).ConclusionsThis NMA showed that IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrated remarkable efficacy in attaining ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and MDA after 12, 16, or 24 weeks of treatment. Among these, IL-17 inhibitors-particularly bimekizumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab-exhibited notably pronounced therapeutic effects. However, bimekizumab showed a less favorable clinical safety profile compared to other biological agents. In contrast, secukinumab and ixekizumab demonstrated a favorable balance of relatively high efficacy and low risk when considering safety profiles.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251023787, identifier CRD420251023787.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundPyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare disease causing painful skin ulcers, typically starting with tender pustules that quickly develop into painful ulcers. Traditional treatments like glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants often have adverse effects and limited efficacy, making them unsuitable for all patients. Recent evidence shows that biological agents are more effective and safer, leading to increased acceptance. However, selecting the most suitable biological agent from the many available options remains a significant challenge for both physicians and patients.ObjectiveTo systematically review the treatment outcomes of two biologics: TNF (tumour necrosis factors)-α inhibitors and IL (interleukin) inhibitors in pyoderma gangrenosum.MethodsA search of Pubmed was conducted on September 7, 2024. A total of 107 studies were included using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of 139 patients were included. Ninety-two were treated with TNF-α inhibitors and 47 with IL inhibitors. The number of included cases and the efficacy are Infliximab (n=52, 88.4%), Adalimumab (n=23, 91.3%), Etanercept (n=13, 84.6%), Certolizumab (n=3, 66.6%), Golimumab (n=1, 100.0%), Anakinra (n=11, 100.0%), Canakinumab (n=7, 100.0%), Secukinumab (n=5, 40.0%), Brodalumab (n=3, 100.0%), Ixekizumab (n=1, 100.0%), Ustekinumab (n=12, 100.0%), Spesolimab (n=3, 100.0%), Guselkumab (n=2, 100.0%), Tildrakizumab (n=2, 100.0%), Risankizuma (n=1, 100.0%). Among them, 46.0% (n=64) achieved complete remission, including 47 (33.8%) who used TNF-α inhibitors and 17 (12.2%) with IL inhibitors. And the total effective rate of IL- inhibitors (93.6%) was higher than that of TNF-α inhibitors (88.0%), but had no statistical significance (p>0.05). However, it takes less time for IL inhibitors to reach partial remission or complete remission. Additionally, in infliximab group, the number of adverse events that occurred was large and varied.ConclusionDifference in effective rate shows no statistical significance between two kinds of agents. However, IL inhibitors demonstrate an advantage with shorter treatment cycles. Additionally, Infliximab has a wider range of side effects and should be used with caution.PROSPERO number: CRD42024608039.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Background Biologics have significantly improved outcomes for patients with psoriasis. However, with multiple agents targeting different immunological pathways, comparative efficacy data is essential to guide optimal treatment selection. Objective To compare the efficacy of eight biologic therapies in achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 response in patients with plaque psoriasis. Methods A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Open-access randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with plaque psoriasis treated with adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, or tildrakizumab were included. Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 at approximately 12 weeks was the primary outcome. A frequentist random-effects model was used Results 29 RCTs (13923 participants) were included. 8 biologics were analyzed. All agents outperformed placebo. 11 of the combinations out of 325 had significant inconsistency. Transitivity assumptions based on randomization and study design were not addressed. Ixekizumab 80mg was the best treatment compared to placebo and all other biologics, while increasing dose of all drugs was not always associated with increasing efficacy except in the cases of Ustekinumab

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BackgroundRecently, the literature has expanded with peer-reviewed studies on immunomodulatory agents' efficacy on scalp psoriasis-which, in turn, widened knowledge gaps regarding these agents' relative effectiveness. We determined the relative efficacy of immunomodulatory monotherapies for scalp psoriasis.MethodsWe ran Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) using outcomes related to Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) and scalp-specific Physician's Global Assessment of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (Sc-PGA 0/1).ResultsWe estimated the relative efficacy of 22 interventions (including placebo), and analyzed 9 outcomes, namely: proportion of participants who attained Sc-PGA 0/1, proportion of participants who achieved 100% improvement in PSSI (PSSI-100), and proportion of participants who achieved 90% improvement in PSSI (PSSI-90) at 8, 12, and 16 weeks.ConclusionsWe are the first to provide comparative evidence on the efficacy of newly investigated agents such as deucravacitinib, tildrakizumab, roflumilast and icotrokinra. In general, the IL-17 inhibitors (bimekizumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, brodalumab) and IL-23 inhibitors (icotrokinra, guselkumab, tildrakizumab) were effective depending upon the outcome and time-point being considered. At 16 weeks, for PSSI-100, ixekizumab 150 mg at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ranked highest; at 16 weeks, for Sc-PGA 0/1 bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks ranked highest; at 8 weeks, for PSSI-100 ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks ranked highest; at 8 weeks, for Sc-PGA 0/1 secukinumab 300 mg at weeks 1, 2, 3 and then every 4 weeks ranked highest. Small-molecule therapies (apremilast, deucravacitinib, roflumilast) improved scalp psoriasis modestly. Our work would guide the design of future studies and clinical decision-making.

Abstract licence: CC BY