Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(4)
Guidance on the use of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil for metastatic colorectal cancer (TA61)
Pembrolizumab for untreated metastatic colorectal cancer with high microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency (TA709)
Caris Molecular Intelligence for guiding cancer treatment (MIB120)
Fluorouracil chemotherapy: The My5‑FU assay for guiding dose adjustment (HTG360)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 13 · Randomised trials: 30 · 1991–2025
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Chikuma Hamada, Fumihiro Tanaka, Mitsuo Ohta, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Adenocarcinoma
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Sue Ward, Eva Kaltenthaler, Jay Cowan, et al.
Health Technology Assessment, 2003
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Capecitabine
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Harubumi Kato, Yukito Ichinose, Morio Ohta, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Adenocarcinoma
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Atsushi Ohtsu, Yasuhiro Shimada, Kuniaki Shirao, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Cisplatin
Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Akio Saiura, Tadatoshi Takayama, et al.
PLoS ONE, 2016
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Leucovorin
- Tegafur
Chikuma Hamada, Masahiro Tsuboi, Mitsuo Ohta, et al.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2009
- Adenocarcinoma
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Toshifusa Nakajima, Atsushi Nashimoto, Masatsugu Kitamura, et al.
The Lancet, 1999
- Adenocarcinoma
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Lee HL, Chen PH, Huang TC, et al.
2025
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Uracil
- Tegafur
BackgroundTegafur-uracil (UFT), an oral fluoropyrimidine developed in Asia, has been investigated as a maintenance or adjuvant therapy in various malignancies. Its use in head and neck cancers, however, remains limited to small retrospective studies, primarily from East Asia. Given the need for cost-effective maintenance strategies in resource-limited settings, we conducted an exploratory systematic review to evaluate the clinical utility of UFT in non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception through 1 May 2025 for retrospective cohort studies evaluating UFT after definitive therapy in non-metastatic HNSCC or NPC. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Given the heterogeneity of included studies, we performed a structured narrative synthesis using the SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) framework to summarize survival outcomes, treatment settings, and clinical contexts.ResultsSeven retrospective studies (four HNSCC, three NPC) involving 508 patients were included. UFT was generally administered at 300-400 mg/day for 6-12 months. Across studies, UFT use was associated with favorable disease-free and overall survival trends in high-risk subgroups, including patients with extranodal extension and persistent EBV DNA. Treatment adherence and toxicity profiles were acceptable.ConclusionsWhile the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, this review highlights recurring signals of benefit associated with UFT maintenance therapy in selected high-risk patients. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings and better define a possible role of UFT in maintenance therapy in some advanced non-metastatic HNSCC and NPC.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Lee HL, Lee CH, Dai MS, et al.
2025
Toshifusa Nakajima, Taira Kinoshitá, Atsushi Nashimoto, et al.
British journal of surgery, 2007
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Tegafur
- Gastrectomy
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.