Tafluprost 15micrograms/ml eye drops 0.3ml unit dose preservative free

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in individuals with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2025 comparing latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost in adults with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Primary outcomes were IOP reduction and conjunctival hyperemia. We assessed study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated with the CINeMA framework. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted in RStudio. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251034803). Results: 25 RCTs published between 2001 and 2024, involving 4,045 participants, were included. All studies compared monotherapy with latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, or tafluprost. Among these, bimatoprost showed the most effective reduction in intraocular pressure compared to latanoprost [mean difference (MD) 0.69; 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.28-1.1; SUCRA 95.6%; moderate confidence]. It also performed significantly better than travoprost (MD 0.64; 0.14-1.09; 39.2%; low confidence). No other comparisons showed statistically significant differences. Overall, the quality of evidence for this outcome ranged from low to moderate. In terms of safety, 16 trials, including 3,119 participants, reported on conjunctival hyperemia. Both bimatoprost [odds ratio (OR) 3.3; 2.5-4.5; 18.4%, high confidence] and travoprost (0.46; 0.33-0.63; 55%, high confidence) were associated with a higher risk of hyperemia compared to latanoprost. Bimatoprost also posed a significantly greater risk than travoprost (1.51; 1.06-2.16, high confidence). Conclusion: Bimatoprost provided the greatest IOP reduction but carried a higher risk of conjunctival hyperemia. Latanoprost and tafluprost offered balanced efficacy with better tolerability, making them suitable for patients with mild disease. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251034803.

Abstract licence: CC BY

AIM: Within the clinical setting, some patients have been identified as lacking in response to PGAs. This meta-analysis study aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, and tafluprost in OAG/OHT patients, latanoprost nonresponders (LNRs), and the IOP-reducing efficacy and safety. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The primary clinical endpoint was the number of responders at the end of the study. The secondary clinical endpoint was the IOP reduction at the endpoint from baseline. Safety evaluation included five common adverse events: conjunctival hyperemia, hypertrichosis, ocular burning, ocular itching, and foreign-body sensation. RESULTS: Eleven articles containing ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis study. The results highlighted that, in the OAG/OHT population, there was no statistically significant difference in the responsiveness of the four PGAs. Bimatoprost had a better IOP-reducing efficacy than latanoprost. There was no significant difference in the IOP-reducing efficacy of travoprost, latanoprost, and tafluprost. In LNRs, the responsiveness of bimatoprost, travoprost, and latanoprost did not show statistical differences. Bimatoprost reduced IOP with a greater extent than latanoprost and travoprost in LNRs, while there was no significant difference in the IOP-reducing efficacy of travoprost and latanoprost. No serious adverse events occurred with the treatment of the four PGAs. The prevalence of conjunctival hyperemia due to bimatoprost or tafluprost was significantly higher than that of latanoprost. Other adverse events had no significant difference between the four drugs. CONCLUSION: The existing studies cannot prove that latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, and tafluprost have different responsiveness in OAG/OHT patients. Switching to bimatoprost or travoprost cannot achieve a significant improvement in responsiveness in LNRs. Bimatoprost has a better IOP-reducing efficacy than latanoprost and travoprost. No serious adverse events occurred during treatment with any medication we studied.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Prostaglandin analogs (PGA’s) or ocular hypotensive lipids are a significant class of medications primarily used in the management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Since their introduction in the late 20 th century, these compounds have revolutionized treatment protocols, offering a potent and effective means of lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). By mimicking the activity of naturally occurring prostaglandins, these analogs enhance the outflow of aqueous humor from the eye, thus reducing IOP and preventing damage to the optic nerve. Their role in clinical practice has expanded due to their relatively favorable side effect profile and once-daily dosing regimen, which promotes patient adherence. This review article delves into the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the PGA’s, including latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, tafluprost, and unoprostone. In addition, this article explores the molecular mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects, the latest clinical trial data, and comparative studies that highlight their relative benefits and limitations. By synthesizing current knowledge and recent advancements, this article aims to provide a comprehensive overview for healthcare professionals, researchers, and students interested in the evolving landscape of glaucoma treatment.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA

Purpose: This review aims to consolidate and evaluate the clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved and BAK-free latanoprost in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). The primary research question addresses whether BAK-free formulations offer comparable efficacy with improved safety profiles compared to BAK-preserved formulations. Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed up to February 2025. Keywords included "latanoprost", "primary open-angle glaucoma", "ocular hypertension", "efficacy", and "safety". Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical trials and meta-analyses comparing latanoprost with placebo or other treatments (eg. bimatoprost, travoprost, tafluprost, latanoprostene bunod). Exclusion criteria included observational studies, review articles, and studies comparing preservative-free prostaglandin analogues and omidenepag. Results: Thirty-two studies (17 randomized clinical trials and 7 meta-analyses) were reviewed. Latanoprost, the first FDA-approved prostaglandin analogue, primarily increases uveoscleral outflow. Comparative studies indicate that latanoprost achieves a good balance between IOP reduction and tolerability compared to bimatoprost, travoprost, tafluprost, and unoprostone. Latanoprost also reduces visual field progression and maintains central corneal thickness (CCT). It improves ocular perfusion pressure (OPP), reducing the risk of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Safety profiles show fewer side effects, such as conjunctival hyperemia, hypertrichosis, and periocular pigmentation, compared to other PGAs. BAK-free formulations demonstrate improved corneal health and patient compliance due to reduced ocular surface toxicity. Conclusion: Latanoprost remains a first-line therapy for POAG and OHT due to its efficacy, safety, and patient adherence. The availability of BAK-free formulations enhances its therapeutic profile, with reduced corneal toxicity making it a preferred choice for long-term glaucoma management.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Increasing evidence indicates that improving ocular blood flow (OBF) can be a therapeutic direction for glaucoma therapy. Tafluprost, a prostaglandin analogue which lowers the intraocular pressure (IOP), has been shown to improve OBF in animals and humans. Several animal experiments showed that topical tafluprost significantly increased optic nerve head and retinal blood flow. Clinical trials also showed a beneficial effect of tafluprost on optic nerve head and macula blood flow, and a good ocular pulse amplitude-lowering effect. But, there are still a few conflicting results. Overall, tafluprost seems to have a beneficial effect on OBF, and the positive effect is probably independent from its IOP-lowering effect, which also is expected to improve OBF. Moreover, reducing the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration may be a possible mechanism of tafluprost’s effect on OBF. More well-designed studies are required to reveal the truth.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Background: As prostaglandin medications, crucial in glaucoma treatment, become more widely used, their local adverse events are increasingly observed. Objectives: To evaluate the common adverse events of four clinically commonly used prostaglandin F (FP) receptor agonists in the treatment of glaucoma in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Design: We screened and analyzed the generic and brand names of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost in the FAERS database and summarized and cleaned the baseline information of subjects receiving the above-mentioned drugs. Methods: Perform descriptive statistical analysis on the baseline information of subjects using the drugs. Conduct disproportionality analysis of drug-related adverse events. The criteria for positive signals of adverse events are established by simultaneously meeting the thresholds set by four methods: the ratio of reported odds, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. Additionally, assess the cumulative risk curves for drug-induced time of the aforementioned drugs and use one-way ANOVA to compare differences in drug-induced time across different groups. Results: The study included 1567 latanoprost, 1517 bimatoprost, 696 travoprost, and 82 tafluprost subjects. Adverse events mainly affected eye disorders, with significant issues in iris hyperpigmentation, ocular pemphigoid, corneal endothelial cell loss, periorbital fat atrophy, corneal irritation, eyelash growth, and ocular hyperemia. The time to onset varied among drugs, with latanoprost showing the longest (mean days = 344.37) and bimatoprost the shortest duration (mean days = 155.65; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although signal detection analysis based on the FAERS database cannot establish a definitive causal relationship, our study found that FP receptor agonists used in glaucoma can cause various adverse events. Assessing their clinical suitability and potential side effects is crucial for providing personalized treatment and ensuring medication safety.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

AIM: To investigate the treatment pattern and safety of tafluprost for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH) in clinical practice in China. METHODS: This post-marketing observational study included patients who received tafluprost to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) within 30d between September 2017 and March 2020 in 20 hospitals in China. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during tafluprost treatment and within 30d after the treatment were collected. RESULTS: A total of 2544 patients were included in this study, of them 58.5% (1488/2544) had primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 21.9% (556/2544) had OH and 19.7% (500/2544) used tafluprost for other reasons. Of 359 ADRs occurred in 10.1% (258/2544) patients, and no serious adverse event occurred. The most common ADR was conjunctival hyperemia (128 ADRs in 124 patients, 4.9%). Totally 1670 participants (65.6%) combined tafluprost with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs; 37.1%, 620/1670), sympathomimetics (33.5%, 559/1670), β-blockers (33.2%, 555/1670), other prostaglandin analogs (PGAs; 15.6%, 260/1670) and other eye drops (15.1%, 253/1670). The highest incidence of conjunctival hyperemia was noted in patients who received tafluprost in combination with other PGAs (23 ADRs in 23 patients, 8.8%, 23/260) and the lowest was in combination with CAIs (16 ADRs in 16 patients, 2.6%, 16/620). Tafluprost was applied in primary angle-closure glaucoma (41.6%, 208/500), after glaucoma surgery (17.8%, 89/500) and after non-glaucoma surgery (15.8%, 79/500). CONCLUSION: Tafluprost is safe for POAG and OH, and tolerable when combined with other eye drops and under various clinical circumstances.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the preservative-free (PF) fixed-dose combination (FC) of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) in treatments-naive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: This was a retrospective, real-world clinical practice setting study that included 107 eyes of 107 subjects with POAG who had never been treated for glaucoma. All subjects were received PF tafluprost/timolol FC once daily. Intraocular pressure (IOP) levels were documented for each eye at the untreated baseline and up to 6 months after the initiation of medical treatment. All adverse events, including ocular and systemic adverse reactions, were recorded. Additionally, the reasons for medication discontinuations were thoroughly documented. RESULTS: A total of 32 POAG patients with high-baseline IOP (>21 mmHg) and 75 with normal-baseline IOP were included in the study. The subjects' baseline mean age was 62.4 ± 8.7 years (range, 26.0-85.0 years); among them, 42 were female (39.3%). Mean IOP at baseline for all patients was 18.6 ± 4.3 mmHg. The mean IOP at 6 months was 12.6 ± 4.7 mmHg, representing a significant decrease compared to the baseline (-32%, p < 0.001). In POAG patients with high-baseline IOP, mean IOP was significantly lowered from 28.0 ± 5.7 mmHg at baseline to 18.0 ± 5.5 mmHg (-35%, p < 0.001); in patients with normal-baseline IOP, from 14.6 ± 3.4 mmHg at baseline to 10.3 ± 4.1 mmHg (-29%, p < 0.001). PF tafluprost/timolol FC was well-tolerated and safe. After 6 months, 97.2% of all patients remained on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world observational study, once-daily treatment with PF tafluprost/timolol FC demonstrated clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy, as well as safety and good tolerability, in treatment-naive patients diagnosed with POAG.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC