Susoctocog alfa 500unit powder and solvent for solution for injection vials

Abstract Rationale A phase II trial reported clinical benefit over 28 weeks in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who received zinpentraxin alfa. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of zinpentraxin alfa in patients with IPF in a phase III trial. Methods This 52-week phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pivotal trial was conducted at 275 sites in 29 countries. Patients with IPF were randomized 1:1 to intravenous placebo or zinpentraxin alfa 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in FVC. Secondary endpoints included absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted FVC and 6-minute walk distance. Safety was monitored via adverse events. Post hoc analysis of the phase II and phase III data explored changes in FVC and their impact on the efficacy results. Measurements and Main Results Of 664 randomized patients, 333 were assigned to placebo and 331 to zinpentraxin alfa. Four of the 664 randomized patients were never administered study drug. The trial was terminated early after a prespecified futility analysis that demonstrated no treatment benefit of zinpentraxin alfa over placebo. In the final analysis, absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in FVC was similar between placebo and zinpentraxin alfa (−214.89 ml and −235.72 ml; P = 0.5420); there were no apparent treatment effects on secondary endpoints. Overall, 72.3% and 74.6% of patients receiving placebo and zinpentraxin alfa, respectively, experienced one or more adverse events. Post hoc analysis revealed that extreme FVC decline in two placebo-treated patients resulted in the clinical benefit of zinpentraxin alfa reported by phase II. Conclusions Zinpentraxin alfa treatment did not benefit patients with IPF over placebo. Learnings from this program may help improve decision making around trials in IPF. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04552899).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a bleeding disorder due to the presence of neutralizing autoantibodies named inhibitors in patients with a previously normal hemostasis. Recent international recommendations suggest the use of bypassing agents or substitutive therapy as the first-line treatment, usually preferring the former. The adequate hemostatic therapy needs an accurate balance between bleeding and thrombotic risks. We report a clinical case of acquired hemophilia A successfully treated with recombinant porcine factor VIII (Susoctocog alfa) as the first-line treatment. Despite the patient having a high-risk thrombotic score and a history of recent myocardial infarction, our experience showed the absence of thrombotic complications related to the use of Susoctocog alfa and a complete restoration of hemostatic parameters. Limited literature is present on the use of recombinant porcine factor VIII as a first-line treatment, and our report supports its use, especially when the thrombotic risk is high.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disease due to autoantibodies directed against clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Treatment of AHA consists of inhibitor eradication with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and prompt control of bleeding obtained with bypassing agents or recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII). The latter has recently been licensed for management of acute bleeding in AHA. Unlike treatment with bypassing agents, rpFVIII can be monitored to provide a successful hemostatic effect and avoid overtreatment. Correlation between rpFVIII inhibitor titers and efficacy of rpFVIII treatment remains a matter of debate. METHODS: We report three cases of AHA in which rpFVIII was successfully used with an unconventional schedule despite the presence of medium-high titers of the rpFVIII. The modified Nijmegen-Bethesda inhibitor assay (NBA) was used to dose porcine FVIII inhibitors. RESULT: The presence of rpFVIII inhibitors prior to the exposition to susoctocog-alfa, that may suggest a cross-reactivity with human FVIII inhibitors, did not affect hemostasis. CONCLUSION: In our experience, rpFVIII demonstrates safety and efficacy in the presence of rpFVIII inhibitors and using an unconventional schedule in both the perioperative and outpatient settings. Laboratory measurement of inhibitors against rpFVIII during treatment is described for the first time.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Introduction: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and serious bleeding disorder that poses significant treatment challenges due to its sudden onset and the risk of severe bleeding episodes. Material and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from 10 adult patients with AHA who were treated with recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII). Specifically, the benefits and challenges of using susoctocog alfa for the treatment of AHA were examined. Results: This case series highlights the efficacy of rpFVIII, particularly in providing essential coagulation support during surgery or invasive procedures, thereby reducing the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Despite the presence of comorbidities that increase the risk of thrombosis, none of the patients experienced thrombotic complications during rpFVIII treatment, indicating a satisfactory safety profile of the drug. Discussion: The analysis showed that rpFVIII is a versatile and effective hemostatic treatment option for patients with AHA, with a clear advantage over bypassing agents in invasive procedures. The laboratory monitoring available with rpFVIII allows for more accurate dosing to meet the individual needs of patients, potentially reducing the risk of thrombosis. This is particularly important in elderly patients with AHA, who may be more susceptible to thrombotic events. Conclusions: Overall, the article confirms that rpFVIII is a valuable and effective option in the comprehensive management of AHA.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Efanesoctocog alfa (Altuviiio,TM Sanofi-SOBI) is a B domain-deleted single-chain Factor VIII (FVIII) connected to D'D3 domain of von Willebrand Factor (vWF). Its ingenious design allows efanesoctocog alfa to operate independently of endogenous vWF and results in an outstanding 3-4 times longer half-life compared to standard and extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products. The prolonged half-life ensures sustained high levels of factor activity, maintaining normal to near-normal ranges for the majority of the week, facilitating the convenience of once-weekly administration. Efanesoctocog alfa received regulatory approval in 2023 for application in both adults and children with inherited hemophilia A in the United States and Japan. Its sanctioned use encompasses both prophylaxis and 'on demand' treatment for bleeding episodes. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of Altuviiio. TM This comprehensive review focuses on the immunological profile of efanesoctocog alfa, a highly sophisticated new class of EHL FVIII molecule. The integration of the vWF D'D3 domain, XTEN polypeptides, and potential regulatory T-cell epitopes within various segments of efanesoctocog alfa collectively serves as a mitigating factor against the development of a neutralizing T-cell-mediated immune response. We hypothesize that such distinctive attribute may significantly reduce the risk of neutralizing antibodies, particularly in previously untreated patients. The discussion extends beyond regulatory approval to encompass the preclinical and clinical development of efanesoctocog alfa, including considerations for laboratory monitoring. The review also highlights areas that warrant further investigation to deepen our understanding of this groundbreaking therapeutic agent.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BACKGROUND: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII, OBI-1, susoctocog alfa) is used for the treatment of acute bleeds in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Inhibitors in AHA can sometimes cross-react with rpFVIII. OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, strength, and determinants of cross-reactivity. PATIENTS/METHODS: Baseline samples from 70 patients of the prospective, observational cohort study GTH-AH 01/2010 were assessed for anti-human FVIII and anti-rpFVIII inhibitors using modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assays, as well as anti-human FVIII domain reactivity using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). RESULTS: Anti-human FVIII inhibitors were present in all samples ranging between 0.7 and 3891 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL. Inhibitors from 31 of 70 patients (44%) partially inhibited rpFVIII with anti-rpFVIII titers ranging between 0.5 and 471 BU/mL. Anti-rpFVIII titers were ≤5 BU in most patients. Patients with cross-reacting inhibitors, as compared to patients without, had significantly higher anti-human FVIII titers (27.8 versus 5.4 BU/mL) and lower baseline FVIII activity (<1 versus 2.6 IU/dL). The ratio between anti-rpFVIII to anti-human titers was highest for inhibitors involving the C1 domain. Cross-reactivity was very rare, if inhibitors reacted only with the C2 domain of FVIII (6%). An anti-human FVIII titer of >100 BU/mL predicted cross-reactivity with 97% likelihood, whereas an anti-human FVIII titer of <3.8 BU/mL predicted absent cross-reactivity with 90% likelihood. CONCLUSION: Cross-reacting inhibitors should be considered when choosing a treatment for bleeding patients with AHA. Cross-reactivity is frequent in patients with anti-human FVIII titers of >100 BU/mL.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Background: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa) is indicated for the treatment of bleeding events (BEs) in adults with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Objectives: To assess the safety, utilization, and effectiveness of rpFVIII in clinical practice. Design: EU post-authorization safety study (PASS) (NCT03199794) was a multicenter, noninterventional, post-authorization safety study conducted in adults with AHA. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively or prospectively for up to 180 days after the last rpFVIII dose. The primary objective was safety, as assessed by adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) (e.g. immunogenicity, hypersensitivity reactions, thromboembolic events). Secondary endpoints included immunogenicity, rpFVIII hemostatic effectiveness, and rpFVIII utilization. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled; 31 completed the study. The median (range) follow-up for patients who completed or discontinued the study was 178 (26–371) days. The median (range) first dose of rpFVIII was 54.0 (11–200) U/kg. Thirty patients reported 46 SAEs; 5 SAEs were considered probably related to rpFVIII, of which 1 was lack of rpFVIII efficacy, and 4 were AESIs: drug resistance due to FVIII inhibition (one patient), antibody test positive for anti-pFVIII inhibitors (one patient), and de novo anti-pFVIII inhibitors (two patients). No hypersensitivity reactions or thromboembolic events were reported. Of the 50 initial BEs, 37 resolved [in a median (interquartile range) of 8.0 (4.0–16.0) days]. Conclusion: Results from this real-world study support the use of rpFVIII for AHA, aligning with findings from the clinical trial of rpFVIII (NCT01178294) in the treatment of BEs in adults with AHA. Trial registration: EUPAS16055; NCT03199794.

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII, susoctocog alfa) is indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes in adults with acquired haemophilia A (AHA). AIM: To provide long-term real-world safety and effectiveness data for rpFVIII in the management of AHA bleeding episodes. METHODS: US PASS (NCT02610127) was a multicentre, uncontrolled, open-label, post-marketing safety surveillance study conducted in adults with AHA. Data were collected retrospectively or prospectively for 180 days after rpFVIII treatment. The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes included haemostatic effectiveness of rpFVIII and rpFVIII utilization. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled from December 2015 to June 2019 (prospective, n = 30; retrospective, n = 23). Six patients experienced seven treatment-related SAEs (incidence 12.0%). The most common treatment-related SAE was FVIII inhibition (inhibiting antibodies to rpFVIII; incidence 8.0%, 95% CI: 2.2-19.2). Five patients reported seven thromboembolic events; one was an SAE and possibly related to rpFVIII. Of bleeding events treated with rpFVIII, 80.3% (57/71) of bleeds resolved with rpFVIII. The median (range) dose of rpFVIII per infusion was 50 (10-300) units/kg, with a median (range) of 6.0 (1-140) infusions and a median (range) time from bleed onset to bleed resolution of 14.0 (2.0-132.7) days. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study of rpFVIII for AHA, no new safety signals were identified compared with previous clinical trial findings. Eighty percent of bleeds resolved with rpFVIII treatment.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC