Sumatriptan 85mg / Naproxen 457mg tablets

ObjectiveTo compare all licensed drug interventions as oral monotherapy for the acute treatment of migraine episodes in adults.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, as well as websites of regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies without language restrictions until 24 June 2023.MethodsScreening, data extraction, coding, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate. Random effects network meta-analyses were conducted for the primary analyses. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who were pain-free at two hours post-dose and the proportion of participants with sustained pain freedom from two to 24 hours post-dose, both without the use of rescue drugs. Certainty of the evidence was graded using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) online tool. Vitruvian plots were used to summarise findings. An international panel of clinicians and people with lived experience of migraine co-designed the study and interpreted the findings.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesDouble blind randomised trials of adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders.Results137 randomised controlled trials comprising 89 445 participants allocated to one of 17 active interventions or placebo were included. All active interventions showed superior efficacy compared with placebo for pain freedom at two hours (odds ratios from 1.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 2.34) for naratriptan to 5.19 (4.25 to 6.33) for eletriptan), and most of them also for sustained pain freedom to 24 hours (odds ratios from 1.71 (1.07 to 2.74) for celecoxib to 7.58 (2.58 to 22.27) for ibuprofen). In head-to-head comparisons between active interventions, eletriptan was the most effective drug for pain freedom at two hours (odds ratios from 1.46 (1.18 to 1.81) to 3.01 (2.13 to 4.25)), followed by rizatriptan (1.59 (1.18 to 2.17) to 2.44 (1.75 to 3.45)), sumatriptan (1.35 (1.03 to 1.75) to 2.04 (1.49 to 2.86)), and zolmitriptan (1.47 (1.04 to 2.08) to 1.96 (1.39 to 2.86)). For sustained pain freedom, the most efficacious interventions were eletriptan and ibuprofen (odds ratios from 1.41 (1.02 to 1.93) to 4.82 (1.31 to 17.67)). Confidence in accordance with CINeMA ranged from high to very low. Sensitivity analyses on Food and Drug Administration licensed doses only, high versus low doses, risk of bias, and moderate to severe headache at baseline confirmed the main findings for both primary and secondary outcomes.ConclusionsOverall, eletriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan had the best profiles and they were more efficacious than the recently marketed drugs lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant. Although cost effectiveness analyses are warranted and careful consideration should be given to patients with a high risk cardiovascular profile, the most effective triptans should be considered as preferred acute treatment for migraine and included in the WHO List of Essential Medicines to promote global accessibility and uniform standards of care.Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework https://osf.io/kq3ys/.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundMenstrual migraine is a subtype of migraine disease that is typically more disabling, longer-lasting, and more challenging to treat. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the relative efficacy of treatments for menstrual migraine.MethodsWe systematically searched databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, and included all eligible randomized controlled trials in the study. We conducted the statistical analysis using Stata version 14.0, based on the frequentist framework. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials version 2 (RoB2) to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.ResultsThis network meta-analysis included 14 randomized controlled trials with 4601 patients. For short-term prophylaxis, frovatriptan 2.5 mg twice daily had the highest probability of effectiveness [OR = 1.87 (95% CI: 1.48 to 2.38)] compared to placebo. For acute treatment, the results showed that sumatriptan 100 mg [OR = 4.32 (95% CI: 2.95 to 6.34)] was the most effective treatment compared to placebo.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that frovatriptan 2.5 mg twice daily was best for short-term prevention, sumatriptan 100 mg were best for acute treatment. More high-quality randomized trials are required to determine the most effective treatment.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background and objectivesAbout a quarter of migraine cases among women have menstrual migraine (MM), which is usually more severe, longer lasting, and less responsive to treatment than typical migraine. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of several medication in the acute and preventive treatment of MM; this meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of these treatments.MethodsWe conducted systematic searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. The primary outcomes of acute treatment trials were pain relief at 2 and 24 h after treatment compared with placebo or another treatment. The three endpoints we checked for studying MM prevention were: no recurrence of headaches each month, a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days from baseline, and a decrease in the mean number of headache days per month.ResultsOut of 342 studies, 26 RCTs met the criteria. Triptans, combined with or without other analgesics, were superior to placebo in providing pain relief in the acute treatment and prevention of MM. Among the treatments, sumatriptan and lasmiditan demonstrated superior pain relief at 2 h (OR: 4.62) and 24 h (OR: 4.81). Frovatriptan exhibited effectiveness in preventing headache recurrence, whereas galcanezumab and erenumab displayed significant preventive benefits in reducing headache days per month.ConclusionSumatriptan and lasmiditan are effective first-line treatments for acute MM. For prevention, frovatriptan may be the more effective of triptans. Compared with triptans, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, here including erenumab and galcanezumab, are more effective in reducing headache days, and therefore, in preventing MM.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether a single dose of intravenous dexamethasone, when added to standard abortive therapy, reduces relapse of migraine after emergency department (ED) discharge in children and adolescents.BackgroundMigraine is a leading cause of headache presentations to the ED for children and adolescents. Although corticosteroids have been suggested to reduce relapse in adults with acute migraine, their efficacy in children remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial at the tertiary pediatric ED of the CHU Sainte-Justine in Montréal, Canada. Patients 8-17 years old with acute migraine attack requiring intravenous rescue therapy (metoclopramide with diphenhydramine) were randomized to receive dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg iv, max 15 mg) or placebo before discharge. All participants were discharged on oral naproxen for 48 h. The primary outcome was relapse within 48 h, defined as recurrence or worsening of headache after initial improvement. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, return to school and activities, health care revisits, and adverse events. Analyses were performed using a modified intention-to-treat approach including all children who provided data for the primary outcome.ResultsBetween July 2013 and February 2025, 116 patients were enrolled, and 87 patients (75%) provided outcome data at 48 h. Median age was 14 years, and 85 patients (73%) were female. Relapse occurred in 39% (16 of 41) of the dexamethasone group versus 44% (20 of 46) of the placebo group (risk difference: -4%; 95% confidence interval, -32% to 24%). Pain scores, return to school, functional recovery, and health care consultations did not differ significantly between groups. Adverse events were infrequent and mild in both arms.ConclusionsIn this small clinical trial of children and adolescents with acute migraine attack treated in the ED, adjunctive dexamethasone did not reduce relapse rates nor improve functional outcomes compared with placebo. Although limited by low statistical power, these findings raise questions about the routine use of dexamethasone in migraine management of children and adolescents.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND