Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (iron 500mg) chewable tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Sucroferric oxyhydroxide
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Sucroferric oxyhydroxide
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Sucroferric oxyhydroxide
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Sucroferric oxyhydroxide on the MHRA register
Velphoro 500mg chewable tablets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
1.5 gram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 10 · Randomised trials: 7 · 2014–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Georgopoulos C, Duni A, Stamellou E, et al.
2025
- Ferric Compounds
- Sucrose
- Sevelamer
IntroductionPhosphate binders are commonly used in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT), aiming to reduce and maintain serum phosphorus. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder has been linked to reduced lifespan and worsened quality of life. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate in patients receiving KRT.MethodsThe data sources examined were MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials with a search deadline of October 2023. We examined randomized controlled trials that compared sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate in the adult population receiving KRT. We performed a meta-analysis combining the data from trials, using R-studio.FindingsInclusion criteria were met by five randomized trials. There was no statistically significant difference in the reduction of serum phosphorus between the two groups (MD: -0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI-random effects: -0.15 to 0.02). In the same line, a non-statistically significant difference was observed in serum i-PTH reduction between the two drugs (MD = -1.53 mg/dL, 95% CI = (-4.45, 1.4), p = 0.26, random effects model). No statistically significant difference was observed in all adverse events between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.88, random effects model). Further analysis of gastrointestinal adverse events revealed that sevelamer carbonate increases gastrointestinal adverse events by up to 60% (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.31-1.97, common (fixed) effect model).DiscussionThis meta-analysis of randomized trials showed that both drugs, sucroferric oxyhydroxide and sevelamer equally and effectively controlled serum phosphorus levels, whereas sucroferric oxyhydroxide revealed a better profile in terms of gastrointestinal adverse events. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a valuable option for patients receiving KRT when sevelamer carbonate is more difficult to tolerate.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Christos Georgopoulos, Anila Duni, Eleni Stamellou, et al.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2024
Katherine Ruth Oracion-Relato, Gian Paulo Flores
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2024
Hou W, Xie P, Fu Y, et al.
2026
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 phosphorus-lowering drugs for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease 3-5 stages.Study design & methodsSystematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched 3 databases from inception through September 2023 for RCTs evaluating 12 phosphorus-lowering drugs. We performed frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and present mean differences and 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses were performed between the dialysis and nondialysis patients to assess robustness, source of heterogeneity, and risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.ResultsWe included 121 trials (18,376 participants) and compared 13 drugs or placebo. In terms of efficacy, except for sodium ferrous citrate, all drugs lowered the level of serum phosphorus compared with placebo. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21), nicotinic acid, and tenapanor were most likely to be ranked the best, second best, or third best. Calcium/magnesium carbonate, nicotinic acid, and colestilan posed lower risks for hypercalcemia than calcium-based phosphorus binders. All phosphorus-lowering drugs significantly affect serum intact parathyroid hormone levels compared with placebo. Colestilan, tenapanor, and PA21 posed a higher risk for gastrointestinal discomfort. In addition, iron-containing drugs showed positive effects on iron parameters.LimitationsFew high-quality RCTs; unclear allocation concealment and blinding; low evidence quality reduced reliability.ConclusionsPA21 has the best phosphorus-lowering effect in hyperphosphatemic adults with chronic kidney disease; considering efficacy and safety, calcium carbonate shows evidence of being the most appropriate drug with or without dialysis.RegistrationRegistered at PROSPERO (CRD42024500243).
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Yong Zhang, feifei Li, yubin Li
2026
Ursula Thiem, Ina Soellradl, Bernhard Robl, et al.
Clinical Kidney Journal, 2020
Abstract Background Calcification propensity is associated with the risk for cardiovascular events and death in end-stage renal disease patients. Here we investigated the effect of lowering serum phosphate with oral phosphate binder therapy on calcification propensity. Methods We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled, crossover study in chronic haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia. Patients (n = 39) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either low-dose (250 mg/day) sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) followed by high-dose (2000 mg/day) SO or vice versa, with washout phases before and after SO treatment. The primary endpoint was changed in calcification propensity as measured by calciprotein particle formation time (T50 test) between washout and high-dose SO treatment in patients with ≥85% adherence to the prescribed SO dose (per-protocol analysis). Results In the primary per-protocol analysis (n = 28), 2000 mg/day SO treatment resulted in a mean increase in T50 of 66 min (95% CI 49–84 min, P < 0.0001), from 243 ± 63 to 309 ± 74 min compared with phosphate binder washout. Serum phosphate decreased from 2.28 ± 0.5 to 1.63 ± 0.43 mmol/L (P < 0.0001). SO at 250 mg/day did not influence T50 (P = 0.4) or serum phosphate concentrations (P = 0.9) compared with phosphate binder washout. The secondary intention-to-treat analysis (n = 39) showed similar results: an increase in T50 of 52 min (95% CI 31–74 min, P < 0.0001) and a decrease in serum phosphate from 2.18 ± 0.5 to 1.64 ± 0.46 mmol/L. No major adverse cardiovascular event, case of calciphylaxis or death occurred during the study. Conclusion Phosphate binder treatment with SO improves serum calcification propensity of haemodialysis patients and might lead to improved outcomes.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
Ursula Thiem, Rodrig Marculescu, Andreas Pasch, et al.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2020
Ursula Thiem, Tim D. Hewitson, Nigel D. Toussaint, et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2020
Evgeny Shutov, Galina Kotlyarova, Ksenia Lysenko, et al.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2022
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
6 hours
Mechanism
Following intravenous administration, iron sucrose is dissociated into iron and…
Food interactions
1 warning
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
10 min
Half-life
6 hours
Protein binding
Volume of distribution
7.3 L
Metabolism
Elimination
5%
While,…
Clearance
20.5 ml/min
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 131 interactions
Monitor iron toxicity through the periodic evaluation of lab works which monitor the body concentration of iron. Lab monitoring of the following parameters: transferrin saturation, serum ferritin concentrations, hemoglobin, and hematocrit could be helpful to avoid iron overload.
Severe allergic symptoms include: rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue; unusual hoarseness); burning or pain at the injection site; burning, numbness, or tingling; chest pain; fainting; loss of consciousness; severe or persistent dizziness, headache, or light-headedness; seizures; shortness of breath; swelling of the hands, ankles, or feet.
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
While, renal elimination of sucrose accounts for 68-75% of the administered dose after 4 and 24 hours respectively.
ATC B03AB02
ATC V03AE05
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Iron sucrose
Matched from: Sucroferric oxyhydroxide
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72