Spiramycin 1.5million unit tablets

Toxoplasmosis is a globally prevalent zoonotic parasitic disease. Neonates with congenital infection can develop severe long-term sequelae, which can be mitigated or prevented through early diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. In this context, the main objective of this study was to describe the main treatments and evaluate the effectiveness of the current treatment protocols for gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis to prevent vertical transmission and to reduce clinical manifestations in neonates. This systematic review with a meta-analysis searched digital databases (PUBMED, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE) for observational cohort studies published between 1 January 2013 and 29 January 2025, evaluating treatment effectiveness in gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models to assess infection risk and clinical manifestations in neonates. The study quality was assessed following the Joanna Briggs Institute protocol and fifty-six studies from 16 countries were included, comprising 11,090 pregnant women and 4138 children. Studies were predominantly from Brazil (38%), France, and Italy. Only 9% of the studies indicated knowledge of the serological status of the pregnant woman before the gestational stage. Of 10,148 women with confirmed toxoplasmosis, 8600 received treatment, with 18% of their children infected, compared to a 58% infection rate in untreated mothers' children. Meta-analysis showed that treatment reduced infection risk (RR = 0.34 [0.21; 0.57]) and clinical manifestations (RR = 0.30 [0.17; 0.56]). While spiramycin or triple therapy showed similar effects, triple therapy demonstrated more consistent results (RR: 0.22 [0.15; 0.32]) compared to spiramycin alone (RR: 0.54 [0.06; 4.67]). In conclusion, treatment protocols for congenital or gestational toxoplasmosis have proven to be effective in reducing the risk of infection and clinical manifestations in neonates. Regarding the type of treatment, although they have similar responses, the use of triple therapy shows more consistent responses than isolated spiramycin. It can be also concluded that prevention and mitigation of congenital toxoplasmosis require standardized treatment protocols, improved diagnostic methods, and educational programs for women of childbearing age, as treatment initiation timing and protocol choice are crucial factors in determining outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

The increased risk of hearing loss with macrolides remains controversial. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze data on the clinical risk of hearing loss, tinnitus, and ototoxicity following macrolide use. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases from database inception to May 2023. Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and text keywords were utilized, without any language restrictions. In addition to the electronic databases, two authors manually and independently searched for relevant studies in the US and European clinical trial registries and Google Scholar. Studies that involved (1) patients who had hearing loss, tinnitus, or ototoxicity after macrolide use, (2) intervention of use of macrolides such as azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, fidaxomicin, roxithromycin, spiramycin, and/or telithromycin, (3) comparisons with specified placebos or other antibiotics, (4) outcomes measured as odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), hazard ratio (HR), and mean difference for ototoxicity symptoms using randomized control trial (RCT)s and observational studies (case-control, cross-section, and cohort studies) were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two extractors, and a crosscheck was performed to identify any errors. ORs along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines for RCTs and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for observational studies were followed. We assessed the hearing loss risk after macrolide use versus controls (placebos and other antibiotics). Based on data from 13 studies including 1,142,021 patients (n = 267,546 for macrolide and n = 875,089 for controls), the overall pooled OR was 1.25 (95% CI 1.07-1.47). In subgroup analysis by study design, the ORs were 1.37 (95% CI 1.08-1.73) for RCTs and 1.33 (95% CI 1.24-1.43) for case-control studies, indicating that RCT and case-control study designs showed a statistically significant higher risk of hearing loss. The group with underlying diseases such as multiple infectious etiologies (OR, 1.16 [95% CI 0.96-1.41]) had a statistically significant lower risk than the group without (OR, 1.53 [95% CI 1.38-1.70] P = .013). The findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that macrolide antibiotics increase the risk of hearing loss and that healthcare professionals should carefully consider this factor while prescribing macrolides.

Abstract licence: CC BY