Sorbitol 70% solution non-crystallising
A polyhydric alcohol with about half the sweetness of sucrose.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Sorbitol
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(3)
Irritable bowel syndrome in adults: diagnosis and management (CG61)
Irritable bowel syndrome in adults (QS114)
Reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran: idarucizumab (ESNM73)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 30 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · 1951–2024
Showing all 30 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Abdulaal Farhan, N. M. Hani
Food Hydrocolloids, 2017
L. Ballesteros-Martinez, Carmen Pérez-Cervera, R. Andrade-Pizarro
NFS Journal, 2020
The search to improve the characteristics of biomaterials obtained from natural biopolymers such as starch has led to the use of mixtures of various polymers with plasticizing agents such as glycerol and sorbitol. In this research, the effect of concentration (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50% starch basis) and type of plasticizer (glycerol and sorbitol) on water solubility (WS), total color difference (ΔE), mechanical properties and water vapor permeability (WVP) of films based on sweet potato starch was evaluated. The mechanical properties were determined by the Puncture Strength method, WVP and WS were performed using gravimetric methods, ΔE was determined by a colorimeter. The results showed an inverse relationship between the puncture resistance and ΔE of the films with the concentration of the plasticizers. However, an increase in plasticizer concentration led to an increase in the percentage of elongation, WS, and WVP of sweet potato starch films. The highest values for percentage elongation and WVP were found in films plasticized with glycerol. Sweet potato starch can be used for the development of film for edible candy wrappers and edible coatings fresh fruit and vegetables.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
E. Aprea, M. Charles, I. Endrizzi, et al.
Scientific Reports, 2017
- Taste
- Sugars
- Fruit
Sweetness is one of the main drivers of consumer preference, and thus is given high priority in apple breeding programmes. Due to the complexity of sweetness evaluation, soluble solid content (SSC) is commonly used as an estimation of this trait. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that SSC and sweet taste are poorly correlated. Though individual sugar content may vary greatly between and within apple cultivars, no previous study has tried to investigate the relationship between the amount of individual sugars, or ratios of these, and apple sweetness. In this work, we quantified the major sugars (sucrose, glucose, fructose, xylose) and sorbitol and explored their influence on perceived sweetness in apple; we also related this to malic acid content, SSC and volatile compounds. Our data confirmed that the correlation between sweetness and SSC is weak. We found that sorbitol content correlates (similarly to SSC) with perceived sweetness better than any other single sugar or total sugar content. The single sugars show no differentiable importance in determining apple sweetness. Our predictive model based on partial least squares regression shows that after sorbitol and SSC, the most important contribution to apple sweetness is provided by several volatile compounds, mainly esters and farnesene.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Mingjun Li, Pengmin Li, F. Ma, et al.
Horticulture Research, 2018
Both sorbitol and sucrose are synthesized in source leaves and transported to fruit for supporting fruit growth in tree fruit species of the Rosaceae family. In apple (Malus domestica), antisense suppression of aldose-6-phosphate reductase, the key enzyme for sorbitol synthesis, significantly decreased the sorbitol concentration but increased the sucrose concentration in leaves, leading to a lower sorbitol but a higher sucrose supply to fruit in these plants. In response to this altered carbon supply, the transgenic fruit had lower concentration of sorbitol and much higher concentration of glucose but similar levels of fructose, sucrose, and starch throughout fruit development relative to the untransformed control. Activities of sorbitol dehydrogenase, fructokinase, and sucrose phosphate synthase were lower, whereas activities of neutral invertase, sucrose synthase, and hexokinase were higher in the transgenic fruit during fruit development. Transcript levels of MdSOT1, MdSDHs, MdFK2, and MdSPS3/6 were downregulated, whereas transcript levels of MdSUC1/4, MdSUSY1-3, MdNIV1/3, MdHKs, and MdTMT1 were upregulated in the transgenic fruit. These findings suggest that the Sucrose cycle and the sugar transport system are very effective in maintaining the level of fructose and provide insights into the roles of sorbitol and sucrose in regulating sugar metabolism and accumulation in sorbitol-synthesizing species.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sandeep Paudel, Sumi Regmi, S. Janaswamy
Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2023
Lele Cao, Wenbo Liu, Lijuan Wang
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018
Dong Meng, Chunlong Li, H. Park, et al.
Plant Cell, 2018
- Alternaria
- Plant Diseases
- Plant Proteins
W. Lim, S. Ock, G. Park, et al.
Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2020
Iveta Pleyerová, Jaromír Hamet, H. Konrádová, et al.
Planta, 2022
- Sorbitol
- Sugar Alcohols
- Mannitol
R. L. Blakley
Biochemical Journal, 1951
- L-Iditol 2-Dehydrogenase
- Oxidoreductases
- Sorbitol
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Sorbitol exerts its laxative effect by drawing water into the large intestine, thereby stimulating bowel movements.
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Elimination
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 1025 interactions
ATC B05CX02
ATC V04CC01
ATC A06AD18
ATC A06AG07
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Sorbitol
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q245280), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.