Somatrogon 24mg/1.2ml solution for injection pre-filled disposable devices

Objective To comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of long-acting human growth hormone (LAGH) preparations with conventional short-acting daily growth hormone (SA-GH) in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD), and explore potential differences across four distinct LAGH platforms through subgroup analyses. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to September 2025 was conducted. Five electronic databases [PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)] were systematically searched without language restrictions. Eligible studies included patients aged <18 years with confirmed GHD (peak GH <10 ng·mL −1 ) and compared any approved once-weekly LAGH preparation with daily SA-GH. Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in height velocity standard deviation score (HV-SDS) and height standard deviation score (Ht-SDS); secondary outcomes included insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS and adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on LAGH platform (PEG-LAGH, somatrogon, somapacitan, lonapegsomatropin) and treatment duration. Results A total of 16 RCTs involving 2,435 children (median follow-up: 52 weeks) were included. Overall, compared with SA-GH, LAGH resulted in a modest but statistically significant improvement in first-year Ht-SDS (mean difference [MD]: 0.08; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.04–0.11). Numerically, LAGH showed superior HV-SDS compared with SA-GH (MD: 0.85; 95% CrI: −0.39 to 2.09), an effect entirely driven by the PEG-LAGH subgroup (MD: 4.35; 95% CrI: 3.78–4.92). IGF-1 SDS was consistently higher in the LAGH group (MD: 0.51; 95% CrI: 0.21–0.80). AE rates did not differ significantly between groups (LAGH: 31%–46% vs. SA-GH: 35%–50%); the PEG-LAGH subgroup exhibited the lowest AE incidence (31.1%). Conclusions Among children with isolated GHD, LAGH represents the preferred platform, offering both superior first-year height velocity and acceptable safety. In contrast, newer prodrug or albumin-binding LAGH formulations provide injection convenience but lack superior growth efficacy.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Since direct comparisons of long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) are lacking, analyses were performed to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies of once-weekly LAGHs for the treatment of pediatric GHD. Indirect comparisons (ICs) using a Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis and a random effects model were performed using daily growth hormone (GH) 0.034 mg/kg/day (base case) or 0.024–0.034 mg/kg/day (alternative analyses) as the common comparator to compare height outcomes to 52 weeks [annualized height velocity, height velocity standard deviation score (SDS), and height SDS]. Identified evidence did not allow IC of safety or longer-term efficacy outcomes so these were qualitatively described. The SLR identified two somapacitan trials, three somatrogon trials (one included in alternative analyses only), and one lonapegsomatropin trial comparing the LAGH with daily GH in treatment-naïve pre-pubertal children for IC. ICs revealed no differences at 52 weeks between somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin, as well as daily GH, with respect to all growth outcomes considered in children with GHD. All three LAGHs had sustained efficacy and were generally well tolerated, with comparable efficacy and safety to daily GH, with the exception of observed injection site pain for somatrogon. No efficacy and safety differences were identified in comparisons of once weekly somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin, as well as daily GH. All treatments were generally well tolerated, with the exception of observed injection site pain for somatrogon. It is valuable to compare similarly acting treatments to determine their relative benefits and risks. Direct comparisons of long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) are lacking, so analyses were performed to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of the LAGH somapacitan versus the LAGHs somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency. Studies of once-weekly LAGHs for the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency were identified using a systematic literature review, then the data obtained were indirectly compared using standard statistical methods with daily growth hormone 0.034 mg/kg/day (base case) or 0.024–0.034 mg/kg/day (alternative analyses) as the common comparator. Height outcomes to 52 weeks (annualized height velocity, height velocity standard deviation score, and height standard deviation score) were compared between treatments. Sufficient information to allow indirect comparison of safety or longer-term efficacy outcomes were not found so these were qualitatively described. The systematic literature review identified two somapacitan trials, three somatrogon trials (one included in alternative analyses only) and one lonapegsomatropin trial comparing the LAGH with daily growth hormone in previously untreated pre-pubertal children for inclusion in the indirect comparison. Indirect comparisons identified no differences to 52 weeks between somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin, as well as daily growth hormone, with respect to all growth outcomes considered in children with growth hormone deficiency. All three LAGHs had sustained efficacy and were generally well tolerated, with comparable efficacy and safety to daily growth hormone, with the possible exception of injection site pain with somatrogon.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Growth hormone (GH) is crucial for childhood growth and body composition. In pediatric GH deficiency (pGHD), the pituitary gland fails to produce sufficient GH, which affects linear growth in childhood. pGHD is conventionally treated with daily recombinant human GH (rhGH); however, because GH therapy lasts throughout childhood, adherence to daily rhGH treatment can be low, resulting in suboptimal effectiveness. Somatrogon is a long-acting GH analog designed to address the challenges associated with daily GH therapy for pGHD. Somatrogon administered once per week is a potential alternative to daily GH therapy. The use of somatrogon is supported by phase II and III clinical trials demonstrating that once-weekly injections are noninferior to once-daily somatropin injections in terms of efficacy, safety, and tolerability and have the advantage of reduced treatment burden. This review summarizes the clinical trials of somatrogon and discusses the therapeutic profile and effects of treating pGHD with reduced injection frequency.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

• For children with growth hormone deficiency, once-weekly somatrogon injections were less of a burden than once-daily somatropin injections. • The safety of weekly somatrogon was similar to that of daily somatropin. • Compared with daily somatropin injections, children with growth hormone deficiency may be less likely to miss weekly somatrogon injections. ○ This is because weekly somatrogon injections were less of a burden and were less likely to interfere with daily activities compared with daily somatropin injections. The purpose of this plain language summary is to help you to understand the findings from recent research. • Somatrogon is used to treat the condition under study that is discussed in this summary. Approval varies by country; please check with your local provider for more details. • The results of this study may differ from those of other studies. Health professionals should make treatment decisions based on all available evidence and not on the results of a single study. This original scientific article on which this summary is based was published in the Journal of the Endocrine Society and can be accessed for free at: https://academic.oup.com/jes/article/6/10/bvac117/6695276 . The details of the original article are as follows: Aristides K. Maniatis, Mauri Carakushansky, Sonya Galcheva, Gnanagurudasan Prakasam, Larry A. Fox, Adriana Dankovcikova, Jane Loftus, Andrew A. Palladino, Maria de los Angeles Resa, Carrie Turich Taylor, Mehul T. Dattani, Jan Lebl. Treatment burden of weekly somatrogon versus daily somatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency: a randomized study. J Endocr Soc 2022; 6(10): bvac117. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac117.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

OBJECTIVES: ) was initiated, after which participants could enroll into an open-label extension (OLE) evaluating the safety and efficacy of long-term somatrogon treatment. METHODS: There were five study periods, Periods I and II were 6 months each while Periods III, IV, and V were 12 months each. In the main study (Periods I and II), 53 prepubertal children with GHD were randomized to once-weekly somatrogon (0.25, 0.48, or 0.66 mg/kg/week) or once-daily Genotropin (0.034 mg/kg/day); 48 continued into the OLE, consisting of Period III (original somatrogon dose; Genotropin recipients randomized to one of three somatrogon doses), Period IV (somatrogon 0.66 mg/kg/week), and Period V (prefilled somatrogon pen [0.66 mg/kg/week]). RESULTS: At the end of Period III, the mean ± SD annual height velocity (HV) for 0.25, 0.48, and 0.66 mg/kg/week somatrogon groups was 7.73 ± 1.89, 7.54 ± 1.28, and 8.81 ± 1.12 cm/year, respectively; HV was sustained during Periods IV/V. Height SD scores (SDS) showed progressive improvement throughout the OLE, regardless of initial cohort assignment, approaching the normal range (-0.69 ± SD 0.87) at the end of Period V Year 1. Mild or moderate treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 81.3% of participants, most unrelated to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 5 years of once-weekly somatrogon was well tolerated and resulted in sustained improvement in height SDS and delta height SDS in prepubertal short children with GHD.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Introduction: The standard of care for pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) is once-daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Somatrogon, a long-acting rhGH, requires less frequent, once-weekly, dosing. We describe physicians' preference for, experiences, and satisfaction with once-weekly somatrogon vs once-daily rhGH. Methods: English-speaking investigators from somatrogon's global phase III study (NCT02968004) with prior experience using once-daily rhGH were included. Participants answered an online survey containing 14 closed- and open-ended items. Results: Twenty-four pediatric endocrinologists (41.7% men; 79.2% practiced at public/private hospitals) from 12 countries with 25.8 ± 12.0 years' experience treating pGHD completed the survey. In terms of the time and effort required to explain device instructions, injection regimen, procedure for missed injection, and address patients'/caregivers' concerns, a similar proportion of physicians chose once-weekly somatrogon and once-daily rhGH; 62.5% physicians indicated that once-daily rhGH required greater effort to monitor adherence. Overall, 75% preferred once-weekly somatrogon over once-daily rhGH, 79.2% considered once-weekly somatrogon to be more convenient and less burdensome, and 83.3% were likely to prescribe somatrogon in the future. Overall, 50% felt that once-weekly somatrogon was more beneficial to patients, while 50% chose "No difference". Most physicians (62.5%) felt both regimens were equally likely to support positive long-term growth outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization. More physicians were "very satisfied" with once-weekly somatrogon (62.5%) than with once-daily rhGH (16.7%). Reduced injection frequency, patient and caregiver burden, increased convenience, and improved adherence were reasons for these choices. Conclusion: Physicians had a positive experience with, and perception of, treating pGHD with once-weekly somatrogon.

Abstract licence: CC BY