Sodium polystyrene sulfonate powder sugar free
Available from a pharmacy with pharmacist advice
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Sodium polystyrene sulfonate
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Sodium polystyrene sulfonate on the MHRA register
Resonium A powder
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
45 gram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 30 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 4 · Randomised trials: 1 · 2019–2025
Showing all 30 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Gabriel Peixoto Aver, Guilherme Ferreira Ribeiro, V. R. Ballotin, et al.
World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2023
BACKGROUND Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is commonly prescribed for the management of hyperkalemia, a critical electrolyte imbalance contributing to over 800000 annual visits to emergency departments. AIM To conduct a systematic review of documented cases of SPS-induced colitis and assess its associated prognosis. METHODS Following the PRISMA-P guidelines, our study employed Medical Subject Headings and Health Sciences Descriptors, skillfully combined using Boolean operators, to conduct comprehensive searches across various electronic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE (PubMed), BIREME (Biblioteca Regional de Medicina), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), Embase, and Opengray.eu. Language criteria were confined to English, Spanish, and Portuguese, with no limitations on the publication date. Additionally, we manually scrutinized the reference lists of retrieved studies. To present our findings, we utilized simple descriptive analysis. RESULTS Our search strategy yielded a total of 442 references. After rigorous evaluation, we included 51 references, encompassing 59 documented cases of colitis. Predominant clinical presentations included abdominal pain, observed in 35 (60.3%) cases, and bloating, reported in 18 (31%) cases. The most frequently affected sites of inflammation were the cecum, rectum, and small intestine, accounting for 31%, 25.8%, and 22.4% of cases, respectively. Colonoscopy findings were described in 28 (48.2%) cases, and 29 (50%) of patients required surgical intervention. Among the subset of patients for whom outcome data was available, 39 (67.2%) experienced favorable outcomes, while 12 (20.6%) unfortunately succumbed to the condition. The mean time required for resolution was 36.7 d, with a range spanning from 1 to 120 d. CONCLUSION SPS demonstrates the capacity to effectively lower serum potassium levels within 24 h. However, this benefit is not without the risk of bowel injury. Our study highlights the absence of high-quality data pertaining to the incidence of adverse events associated with SPS usage, making it challenging to determine whether the potential risks outweigh the benefits. However, a significant mortality rate related to SPS-induced colitis was noted. Future investigations should prioritize randomized controlled trials with a sufficiently large patient cohort to ascertain the true utility and safety profile of this medication.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
M. Elsayed, Marwa Ahmed Abdelrahman, Abdelrazik Mohamed Sorour, et al.
BMC Nephrology, 2025
- Renal Dialysis
- Hyperkalemia
BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a frequent life-threatening condition in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Data comparing the usage of various K + binders in HD patients is still scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) for treatment of hyperkalemia in HD patients. METHODS: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized multicenter clinical trial enrolled 120 HD patients with predialysis serum potassium > 5 mmol/L. Patients were randomized to receive SZC (5 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 15 gm/wk) or SPS (15 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 45 gm/wk) for 8 weeks. The change in serum potassium through the 8 weeks of the study was our primary outcome. RESULTS: Serum potassium significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline values from the first week till the end of the study with p value of < 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. Serum K levels in the SZC group were significantly lower (achieved normokalemia after 2 weeks) than K levels in the SPS group (achieved normokalemia after 6 weeks) through the study period (p < 0.001). Rescue therapy for hyperkalemia was less frequent in the SZC group (3.3%) than the SPS group (6.6%) (p = 0.678). Gastrointestinal side effects were non significantly fewer with SZC (5%) compared to SPS (11.6%). However, SPS was less palatable (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to SPS treatment, SZC was associated with a more rapid and efficacious resolution of hyperkalemia with potentially a better safety profile and palatability among HD patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06029179. First registration date: 9/01/2023.
Abstract licence: CC BY
J. Noel, S. Bota, W. Petrcich, et al.
JAMA internal medicine, 2019
- Cation Exchange Resins
- Enterostomy
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
Jimmy Gonzalez, D. Nayyar
Hospital Pharmacy, 2023
Joi Lin, Catherine Chun, Spencer Lee, et al.
Critical Care Medicine, 2021
Shiv Narayan Yadav, Summi Rai, Ajaya Bhattarai, et al.
Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2024
Joyce O, Corpman M
2024
- Hyperkalemia
- Polystyrenes
- Silicates
Eileen Sullivan, Melanie C. Ruegger, Ian Dunne, et al.
American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2023
- Hyperkalemia
- Polystyrenes
- Potassium
Noah Yoo, Yong-Bum Song, I. Dubinsky, et al.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2023
- Hyperkalemia
- Hypertension
- Polystyrenes
Chikao Onogi, Yu Watanabe, Akihito Tanaka, et al.
Clinical Kidney Journal, 2024
Background: Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), a novel drug used for treating hyperkalaemia, is effective in reducing serum potassium levels. The effects of potassium adsorbents on the mortality and hyperkalaemia-associated hospitalisation rates remain unclear. We aimed to examine how mortality and hyperkalaemia-associated hospitalisation rates vary with usage of various potassium adsorbents. Methods: This retrospective study used patients' data between April 2008 and August 2021 obtained from a large-scale Japanese medical claims database. Consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) prescribed potassium adsorbents were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the adsorbent type [SZC, calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS), and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS)] and were observed for 1 year. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality and hyperkalaemia-associated hospitalisation. Results: In total, 234, 54 183, and 18 692 patients were prescribed SZC, CPS, and SPS, respectively. The SZC group showed a higher event-free survival rate than the other two groups. The hazard ratio for the primary outcome in the CPS and SPS groups was similar in the analyses of the subgroups of patients who did not receive renal replacement therapy and those who received haemodialysis. The SZC group had a higher renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) continuation rate compared to CPS and SPS groups, the difference being especially significant for SPS. Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrated the therapeutic effect of SZC in reducing mortality and hyperkalaemia-associated hospitalisations. The high RAASi continuation rate in the SZC group might be a contributing factor for improvement of the primary outcome.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Molecular structure

ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q3395465), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. Molecular structure images from Wikimedia Commons.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.