Sodium perborate 1.5g powder for mouthwash sachets
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Sodium perborate
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Randomised trials: 2 · Trials: 1 · 1978–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Anles RD, Kottaigandhi GD, Sherwood IA, et al.
2026
AimThis study compared the effectiveness, color stability, and patient satisfaction of Opalescence Endo and 30% hydrogen peroxide (HP) with sodium perborate in internal (walking) bleaching of discolored, root canal-treated maxillary anteriors.Materials and methodsA total of 122 discolored teeth were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1: Opalescence Endo (n = 61) and Group 2: 30% hp with sodium perborate (n = 61). Patients were recalled at 7-day intervals, with a maximum of three bleaching sessions. Bleaching efficacy was assessed subjectively using a 5-point Visual Analog Scale and objectively using CIELAB (∆E, Lightness Deviation Percentage, Lightness Recovery Percentage, L*).Statistical analysisMann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon test were conducted for intergroup and intragroup comparisons, respectively.ResultsSignificant differences were observed in the L* value after treatment (Group 1: 81.66 and Group 2: 83.52), total days taken for bleaching (Group 1: 16.76 days and Group 2: 21.80 days), and the first-time color change noted by the patient (Group 1: 1.95 days and Group 2: 3 days), favoring the Opalescence Endo. For severely discolored teeth (n = 15), a significant difference was observed in Lightness Recovery Percentage between the groups (Group 1: 72.97% and Group 2: 53.17%). Both groups showed high patient satisfaction and color stability over 12 months.ConclusionOpalescence Endo demonstrated superior performance and faster bleaching compared to 30% HP with sodium perborate.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Odofin AD, Taiwo J, Solanke IA, et al.
2023
Alexander McKillop, William R Sanderson
Tetrahedron, 1995
Alexander McKillop, Duncan Kemp
Tetrahedron, 1989
Alexander McKillop, Jonathan A. Tarbin
Tetrahedron Letters, 1983
Yang L, Cheng H, Li H, et al.
2024
Single-atom catalysts (SACs) are flourishing in various fields because of their 100% atomic utilization. However, their uncontrollable selectivity, poor stability and vulnerable inactivation remain critical challenges. According to theoretical predictions and experiments, a heteronuclear CoZn dual-single-atom confined in N/O-doped hollow carbon nanotube reactors (CoZnSA@CNTs) is synthesized via spatial confinement growth. CoZnSA@CNTs exhibit superior performance for H2O2 electrosynthesis over the entire pH range due to dual-confinement of atomic sites and O2 molecule. CoZnSA@CNTs is favorable for H2O2 production mainly because the synergy of adjacent atomic sites, defect-rich feature and nanotube reactor promoted O2 enrichment and enhanced H2O2 reactivity/selectivity. The H2O2 selectivity reaches ∼100% in a range of 0.2-0.65 V versus RHE and the yield achieves 7.50 M gcat -1 with CoZnSA@CNTs/carbon fiber felt, exceeding most of the reported SACs in H-type cells. The obtained H2O2 is converted directly to sodium percarbonate and sodium perborate in a safe way for H2O2 storage/transportation. The sequential dual-cathode electron-Fenton process promotes the formation of reactive oxygen species (•OH, 1O2 and •O2 -) by activating the generated H2O2, enabling accelerated degradation of various pollutants and Cr(VI) detoxification in actual wastewater. This work proposes a promising confinement strategy for catalyst design and selectivity regulation of complex reactions.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Halil Şenol
Energy Technology, 2025
Mehrotra A, Singh S, Podar RS, et al.
2023
AimThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of different bleaching agents on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when using either GC Fuji type 2 glass ionomer cement (GIC) or Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE as intraorifice barriers (IOB).Materials and methodsA total of 80 single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were prepared and obturated. Three millimeters of gutta-percha was then removed from the orifice. The specimens were divided into two primary groups based on the type of IOB material used: GC Fuji type 2 GIC and Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE (n = 40). Each group was further divided into four subgroups based on the bleaching agent used: Carbamide peroxide (CP) 37%, sodium perborate (SP), hydrogen peroxide (HP) 35%, and distilled water used as the control (n = 10). The teeth were subjected to fracture resistance testing.ResultsThe study found that the order of root fracture resistance was control > CP > SP > HP. There was no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance between GC Fuji type 2 GIC and Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE when used as IOB materials.ConclusionThe study concluded that the choice of bleaching agent significantly affects the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. It was observed that fracture resistance is lowest with HP, followed by SP and CP. Both GC Fuji type 2 Glass Ionomer and Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE are effective as IOB.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
Albayrak MGB, Yanar S, Korak T, et al.
2025
- Borates
- Neuroprotective Agents
- Proteomics
Patel MP, Parmar VB, Rami DS, et al.
2024
Introduction Older adults experience significant improvement in their quality of life by using removable prosthetics to replace missing teeth. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) has become the most popular material for denture bases due to its ease of use and affordability. Recently, scientists have started adding nanoparticles like titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zirconium oxide (ZrO2) to PMMA to enhance its physical properties. These resins with nanoparticles need to stay the same color after being disinfected in different ways if they are going to be used for a long time. So, the purpose of this investigation was to assess whether or not there exists any difference between two kinds of thermally cured acrylic resin for artificial tooth bases strengthened with nanoparticles when subjected to various chemical sterilizers alongside microwave irradiation, as well as determine their comparative colorfastness levels. Materials and methods In this lab experiment, we tested how well 5% TiO2 and 7% ZrO2 nanoparticle-reinforced PMMA resins held their color when exposed to microwave irradiation, 1% sodium hypochlorite, or sodium perborate disinfection. We made 120 specimens shaped like discs; half were treated using one method, while the other half were treated using a different method. Color was measured at baseline (T0), after one cycle (T1), after five cycles (T2), and after six months (T3) using a reflectance spectrophotometer, which calculates the color difference (∆E). Results All three methods of disinfection caused significant color changes (p<0.001); however, sodium perborate caused the least amount of change, followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite and microwave irradiation. The mean ∆E values showed that after one day, there was a change in color by 1.1 due to microwave disinfection, which increased to 5.7 after five days; on the other hand, for 1% sodium hypochlorite, the change was recorded as 0.7 after one month and 1.6 after three months and finally reached up to 2.6 after six months, while sodium perborate showed the least amount of change, with ∆E values recorded as 0.2 after one month, 0.5 after three months, and 0.8 after six months. Conclusion Sodium perborate proved to be the most effective disinfectant for maintaining color stability in 5% TiO2 and 7% ZrO2 nanoparticle-reinforced PMMA resins, thus making it ideal for routine disinfection. Therefore, according to this study, sodium perborate should be used as a disinfection method because it results in minimal color change in nanoparticle-reinforced PMMA dentures.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.