Sodium hyaluronate 0.15% / Trehalose 3% eye drops 0.4ml unit dose preservative free

Artificial tears are the mainstay of dry eye disease management, but also have a role in corneal abrasion and wound healing, pain and inflammation management, conjunctivitis, keratitis, contact lens rewetting and removal, and foreign body removal. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (PROSPERO registration CRD42022369619) comparing the efficacy of artificial tears in patients with dry eye to inform prescribing choices using Web of Science, PubMed and Medline databases identified 64 relevant articles. There is good evidence that artificial tears improve symptoms of dry eye disease within a month of regular use, applied about four times a day, but signs generally take several months to improve. Not all patients with dry eye disease benefit from artificial tears, so if there is no benefit over a month, alternative management should be considered. Combination formulations are more effective than single active ingredient artificial tears. Artificial tears containing polyethylene glycol are more effective than those containing carboxymethylcellulose/carmellose sodium and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Those classified as having evaporative dry eye disease, benefit from artificial tears with liposomes, especially of higher concentration. The data available is limited by the definition of dry eye disease applied in published studies being variable, as well as the disease severity examined and compliance with artificial tears being rarely quantified.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

The purpose of the research project was to extensively review the efficacy and safety of a trehalose tear-substitute treatment in cases of dry eye disease (DED). A systematic review that included only full-length randomized controlled studies (RCTs) reporting the effects of trehalose tear-substitute treatment in three databases, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The search period included papers published before 8 August 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to analyze the quality of the studies selected. A total of 10 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Trehalose tear-substitute treatments achieved a higher improvement than did control group interventions in all reported variables. The mean differences between both groups were in favor of trehalose, and were as follows: ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire score of -8.5 ± 7 points, tear film breakup time (TBUT) of 1.9 ± 1 s, tear film thickness (TFT) of 0.25 ± 0.1 μm, tear meniscus height (TMH) of 0.02 ± 0.02 mm, Schirmer test (ST) of 0.8 ± 1.4 mm, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) of -0.7 ± 0.1 points and visual acuity (VA) of 0.3 ± 2.1 letters. No adverse events after trehalose tear-substitute treatments were reported. Trehalose tear substitutes are a safe and effective treatment for DED. Therefore, trehalose tear substitutes should be recommended for patients with dry eye disease. In addition, there is specific evidence to support its use in the preoperative cataract surgery period.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background/Objectives: This Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hyaluronic acid hydrogel cross-linked with hexamethylenediamine (HMDA-HA) compared to a conventional 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linked HA (BDDE-HA) in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: A total of 223 adults (mean age 63.5 years; 167 women) with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-III knee OA were randomised 1:1 to receive two intra-articular injections of HMDA-HA or BDDE-HA at baseline and at 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline in weight-bearing pain (WBP) on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at Week 12, assessed in the per-protocol population. A non-inferiority margin of 10 mm was predefined. Secondary outcomes included global assessments, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index scores, responder rates, and rescue medication use [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06307847]. Results: At Week 12, least squares mean change (standard error [SE]) in WBP was -23.72 (1.88) mm in the HMDA-HA group (n = 83) and -25.99 (1.76) mm in the BDDE-HA group (n = 95), yielding a difference of 2.26 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.83 to 7.34; p = 0.3825), thus demonstrating the non-inferiority of HMDA-HA to BDDE-HA. Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. A total of 136 adverse events were reported: 44 (41.1%) in the HMDA-HA group and 32 (28.1%) in the BDDE-HA group, with no treatment-related adverse drug reactions. Conclusions: A single-injection intra-articular regimen of HMDA-HA was effective and safe for the treatment of adult patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA.

Abstract licence: CC BY