Sodium glycerophosphate 4.32g/20ml solution for infusion ampoules
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Sodium glycerophosphate is one of several glycerophosphate salts.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Sodium glycerophosphate
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Sodium glycerophosphate on the MHRA register
Sodium glycerophosphate 4.32g/20ml concentrate for solution for infusion ampoules
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · Randomised trials: 3 · 1936–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Jung-Ting Chang, Yu-Jun Chang, Lih-Ju Chen, et al.
Children, 2025
Background/Objectives: Sodium glycerophosphate improves the adverse side effects of parenteral nutrition. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate different outcomes, including metabolic bone disease and electrolyte imbalance, associated with the use of sodium glycerophosphate or inorganic phosphate in parenteral nutrition for preterm neonates. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 402 newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of one medical center between January 2019 and September 2021. Of them, 205 received sodium glycerophosphate as parenteral nutrition, while the other 197 received inorganic phosphate. Baseline characteristics and growth parameters, including body weight, body length, and head circumference in the first year of life; calcium and phosphate content of parenteral nutrition in the first 4 weeks; calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and creatinine levels; and morbidities were compared. Results: During the first 4 weeks, the calcium and phosphate contents of parenteral nutrition were significantly higher in the sodium glycerophosphate vs. inorganic phosphate group. Growth parameters did not differ significantly between groups. The sodium glycerophosphate group showed a higher mean serum phosphate level (4.0 ± 1.2 mg/dL vs. 3.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL, p = 0.001), lower serum ALP level (402.8 ± 202.8 U/L vs. 466.4 ± 228.6 U/L, p = 0.004), lower seizure incidence (4.9% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.003), and higher hypocalcemia incidence (41.5% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.038). However, there were no significant intergroup differences in other common morbidities such as metabolic bone diseases of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, electrolyte imbalance, hypoglycemia, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. Conclusions: Compared to inorganic phosphate, sodium glycerophosphate is associated with higher serum phosphate levels, lower ALP levels, and reduced seizure incidence in premature infants. However, as the study was retrospective and single-center, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Manar Foura-Matar, Hazem Melad, Mohammed Taha
International Journal of Dentistry, 2026
Background Immediate dental implant placement into extraction sockets offers reduced treatment time and favorable patient outcomes. Achieving early implant stability and predictable osseointegration is essential for long‐term success. This study aimed to evaluate whether a topical combination of dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, and β‐sodium glycerophosphate could enhance early implant stability in humans. The trial was designed as a randomized split‐mouth superiority study comparing test implants treated with the osteogenic inducer (OI) to control implants placed under identical surgical conditions. Methods This split‐mouth randomized clinical trial included 18 systemically healthy adults requiring two adjacent or contralateral implants in the same jaw. All surgeries were performed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Al‐Azhar University‐Gaza. Each participant received one test implant (with a gelatin sponge saturated with the OI) and one control implant (with a plain gelatin sponge). Allocation of test and control sites was determined using centralized computer–generated randomization. The primary outcome was the implant stability, assessed using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) at baseline and after 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Outcome assessment was performed by an examiner blinded to group allocation. Results At 4 weeks, the test group demonstrated significantly higher ISQ values (70.19 ± 6.31) than the control group (65.35 ± 4.23; p = 0.036). No significant differences were observed at baseline, 8 weeks, or 16 weeks. However, implant stability increased significantly over time in both groups ( p < 0.05), with the highest ISQ values observed at 16 weeks. Conclusion The first‐in‐human clinical study investigating this topical osteogenic combination demonstrated a measurable short‐term benefit in enhancing early implant stability. Although the effect did not persist at later time points during the 16‐week follow‐up period, the findings suggest that this biological adjunct may support accelerated healing during the early phase of osseointegration. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07060859
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
M. Kates, L. Yengoyan, P. Sastry
Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1965
R. Hanning, S. Atkinson, R. Whyte
The American journal of clinical nutrition, 1991
Aipeng Deng, Xi Kang, Jing Zhang, et al.
Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2017
- Sodium Bicarbonate
- Sodium
- Chitosan
Xiaole Qi, Xiaoxue Qin, Rong Yang, et al.
Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2016
R. Lynch
International dental journal, 2004
Ludvig N.W. Daae, Jon Bremer
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Lipids and Lipid Metabolism, 1970
Kudelaiti Abudukelimu, Aikepaer Aierken, Ailifeire Tuerxuntayi, et al.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2024
Introduction: The production of bone-like structural scaffolds through bone tissue engineering technology is a promising method for bone regeneration to repair bone defects. Deer antler, an easily harvested and abundantly sourced initial bone tissue structure, resembles the composition and structure of human cancellous bone and can serve as a new material for allogeneic bone transplantation.Methods: This study involved the preparation and characterization of antler powder/chitosan/β-glycerophosphate sodium/polyvinyl alcohol (AP/CS/β-GP/PVA) porous hydrogel scaffolds to verify their material properties and osteogenic mechanisms. The microstructure, hydrophilicity, and mechanical properties of the scaffolds were studied using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), contact angle measurement, and a universal material testing machine. The interactions between the various components were investigated using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Biocompatibility, osteogenic properties, and expression of osteogenesis-related proteins of the scaffolds were evaluated through Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays, alkaline phosphatase staining, Alizarin Red staining, live/dead cell staining, and Western blot analysis.Results: The results showed that as the content of deer antler powder increased, both the hydrophilicity and mechanical properties of the scaffold materials improved, while the porosity slightly decreased with an increase in deer antler powder content. Cell culture experiments demonstrated that scaffolds with a higher proportion of deer antler powder were beneficial for the proliferation and differentiation of mouse pre-osteoblast (MC3T3-E1) cells, with the scaffolds containing 10% and 8% deer antler powder showing the best effects. The upregulation of RUNX2, OCN, OSX, and OPN protein expression may promote differentiation.Discussion: Therefore, the AP/CS/β-GP/PVA hydrogel scaffolds have the potential to become a promising biomaterial for bone tissue engineering.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
2.06h
Mechanism
Sodium glycerophosphate acts as a donor of inorganic phosphate [A32667].
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
4h
[A32667]
Half-life
2.06h
[A32667]
Metabolism
[A32667]
The extent of this reaction is dependent on serum alkaline phosphatase activity.
Elimination
[A32667]
…
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
[A32667]
[A32667]
[A32667]
The extent of this reaction is dependent on serum alkaline phosphatase activity.
[A32667]
There may be a very small amount of glycerophosphate excreted in the urine unchanged.
ATC B05XA14
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Sodium glycerophosphate
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72