Sodium fusidate 250mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Sodium fusidate
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
1.5 gram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Injectables
(1)Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 1 · Randomised trials: 1 · Trials: 3 · 1969–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Yuan Qin, Qian Yi
Clinical Research Communications, 2020
Journal of General - Procedural Dermatology & Venereology Indonesia, 2025
John P. Longenecker, Alan C. Moses, Jeffrey S. Flier, et al.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1987
- Absorption
- Biological Availability
- Fusidic Acid
S. Jin, Kyeong Soo Kim, D. Kim, et al.
International journal of pharmaceutics, 2016
- Bandages
- Adhesiveness
- Fusidic Acid
H. Noukrati, Y. Hamdan, O. Marsan, et al.
International journal of pharmaceutics, 2024
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Bone Cements
- Calcium Phosphates
Ahmad Eid, Ibraheem Istateyeh, Noura Salhi, et al.
International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2019
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Emulsions
- Fusidic Acid
PURPOSE: Fusidic acid (FA) and sodium fusidate (SF) have problems in their skin penetration and stability resulting in a reduction in their potency; therefore, the objective of this study was to develop FA and SF nanoemulgels to improve the antibacterial activity of the drugs. METHODS: FA and SF nanoemulgel formulations were prepared by the incorporation of FA and SF nanoemulsions with Carbopol hydrogel. First, the drugs were screened for their solubility in different oils and surfactants to choose the suitable oil and surfactants for the drugs, and then the drug nanoemulsion formulations were prepared by a self-nanoemulsifying technique using Tween 80, Span 20 and pine oil. The drug nanoemulgels were evaluated for their particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), rheological behaviour, drug release and anti-microbial activity. RESULTS: Based on the solubility test, pine oil was the best solubilising oil for both drugs, Tween 80 and Span 20 showed the highest solubilising ability for both the drugs among the surfactants; therefore, they were chosen as surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively. The optimum self-nanoemulsifying formulations showed a particle size for fusidic acid and Sodium fusidate of 140.58 nm and 151.86 nm respectively, and both showed a low PDI below 0.3. After incorporating both drug SNEDDS formulations with Carbopol at different concentrations, the results of the drugs particle size and PDI showed no significant difference. The zeta potential results for both drugs nanoemulgels showed a negative potential with more than 30 mV. All nanoemulgel formulations showed pseudo-plastic behaviour with the highest release pattern at 0.4% Carbopol. The antibacterial activity of both drug nanoemulgel formulations showed superiority over the market product. CONCLUSION: Nanoemulgel is a promising delivery system for FA and SF that helps in improving the stability and antibacterial activities of the drugs.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 3.0
Keihankhadiv S, Neugebauer D
2023
Bioactive linear choline-based copolymers were developed as micellar carriers for drug delivery systems (DDSs). The polymethacrylates containing trimethylammonium groups with p-aminosalicylate anions (PAS-based copolymers: series 1) or chloride anions (Cl-based copolymers: series 2) differing in ionic content and chain length were selected for drug loading. The diverse structures of amphiphilic copolymers made it possible to adjust the encapsulation efficiency of a well-known antibiotic, i.e., p-aminosalicylate in the form of sodium salt (PASNa) or acid (PASA), providing single drug systems. Goniometry was applied to verify the self-assembly capacity of the copolymers using the critical micelle concentration (CMC = 0.03-0.18 mg/mL) and the hydrophilicity level quantifying the surface wettability of polymer film using the water contact angle (WCA = 30-53°). Both parameters were regulated by the copolymer composition, indicating that the increase in ionic content caused higher CMC and lower WCA, but the latter was also modified to a less hydrophilic surface by drug encapsulation. The drug content (DC) in the PAS-based polymers was increased twice by encapsulation of PASNa and PASA (47-96% and 86-104%), whereas in the chloride-based polymer systems, the drug was loaded in 43-96% and 73-100%, respectively. Efficient drug release was detected for PASNa (80-100% series 1; 50-100% series 2) and PASA as complete in both series. The strategy of loading extra drug by encapsulation, which enhances the drug content in the copolymers containing anions of the same pharmaceutics, provided promising characteristics, which highlight the potential of PAS-loaded micellar copolymers for drug delivery.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Hamza Elbaza, Hanaa Mabroum, El Mehdi Toufik, et al.
Materialia, 2024
Arnold P. Oranje, O. Chosidow, Sarvajnamurthy Sacchidanand, et al.
Dermatology, 2007
- Administration, Topical
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Diterpenes
Abeydeera N, Chen G, Zarea K, et al.
2026
Background/Objectives: The widespread use of mupirocin and fusidic acid for the treatment and decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) skin infections has led to a rapid emergence of resistant strains, limiting the effectiveness of the few topical agents currently available for clinical use. Methods: In this study, we evaluate Fe(tropo)3, a neutral and lipophilic iron(III)-tropolone complex, as a non-antibiotic topical antimicrobial candidate for the management of drug-resistant SA skin and soft tissue infections. Results: Fe(tropo)3 exhibits potent in vitro activity against methicillin-susceptible SA, methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate SA, and strains with high-level resistance to mupirocin and fusidate, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2 µg/mL across all tested isolates. The compound effectively penetrates bacterial cells, induces intracellular iron accumulation, and triggers dose-dependent reactive oxygen species generation, resulting in rapid bacterial killing and significant antibiofilm activity. Importantly, Fe(tropo)3 shows a slower development of resistance compared with ciprofloxacin and displays synergistic activity with oxacillin against MRSA. When formulated as a 1% topical ointment, Fe(tropo)3 significantly reduces bacterial burden in a murine excisional wound infection model, achieving a 98% ± 1% reduction in SA load without detectable hemolysis or skin irritation. Conclusions: These pilot study results support Fe(tropo)3 as a clinically relevant, mechanism-distinct topical antimicrobial with potential utility in settings where resistance to existing topical antibiotics compromises standard care.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.