Sodium alginate 225mg/dose / Magnesium alginate 87.5mg/dose oral powder sachets sugar free
Available from a pharmacy with pharmacist advice
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Sodium alginate + Magnesium alginate
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Sodium alginate + Magnesium alginate on the MHRA register
Gaviscon Infant oral powder sachets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 4 · Randomised trials: 1 · 2005–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Rahman MA, Abraham R, Hampson DJ, et al.
2026
- Bacteriophages
- Bacterial Infections
- Phage Therapy
Phage therapy has enormous potential in combating bacterial resistance in food animals. However, its application via the oral route remains limited due to challenges associated with the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) environment and a lack of rigorous clinical trial evidence. Therefore, we systematically searched in Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines and finally identified 111 articles on oral phage therapy in food animals from where we summarized the key physiological and chemical factors of the gut environment hindering the effectiveness of oral phage therapy (OPT), examined the methods used to evaluate phage stability in the GI environment, and highlighted potential strategies to mitigate these challenges. In addition, we performed quantitative analysis to visualize in vitro pH and thermal stability patterns of phages targeting bacteria isolated from food animals and variability in buffer and incubation period across stability studies. The GIT consists of several anatomically and functionally distinct segments, where complex interactions occur among digestive enzymes, gastric acids, electrolytes, commensal microbiota, and mucosal immune components. The acidic pH of the stomach is a major barrier to successful oral phage delivery. According to our analysis of pH stability testing data from the reviewed studies, most phages targeting antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in food animals remained stable at pH 5-9 and inactivated under highly acidic (pH ≤ 2) or highly alkaline (pH ≥ 11) conditions. In addition, phages are susceptible to high temperatures (above 60 °C), digestive enzymes (e.g., pepsin, trypsin, lipases), bile salts, and host immune responses. Several in vitro laboratory techniques are available to assess phage stability under simulated GI conditions, but variations occur in the assessment protocols. Microencapsulation using alginate and chitosan has been used to protect phages from the adverse GI environment. Additionally, enteric-coated capsules, antacids, co-encapsulation with acid-neutralizing agents, consumption of alkaline water, and daily phage administration are suggested to improve phage survival and efficacy. For the successful clinical implementation of OPT in food animals, future research should focus on elucidating the molecular and physicochemical determinants of phage stability, understanding the humoral immune response to OPT, standardizing laboratory protocol for assessing phage viability, improving the scalability of encapsulation methods, and exploring other potential delivery techniques.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Carbone F, Scheepers J, Van den Houte K, et al.
2026
- Proton Pump Inhibitors
- Deprescriptions
- Primary Health Care
IntroductionCurrent Belgian guidelines state that chronic proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is indicated for oesophagitis grade C and D, Barrett's oesophagus, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, or to prevent bleeding ulcers with chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) intake in patients at risk. Guidelines justify empiric short-term PPI therapy in other cases to control symptoms. Yet, there is insufficient PPI down-titration and/or cessation. As such, concerns have risen related to the impact of PPIs on the healthcare budget and increasing number of risks and side effects. This study aims to provide evidence to determine which strategy provides the most effective approach for stopping chronic intake of PPIs in patients in whom there is no firm medical indication for their continued use.Methods and analysisThis is a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised clinical trial. General practitioners will randomise 609 to one of three PPI deprescription strategies. Patients on a high-dose PPI are allowed to participate after down-titrating their dose to a maintenance dose for 1 month before being randomised. Patients unable to decrease the high-dose PPI are not to be randomised. Following randomisation, patients will be requested to adapt their PPI intake for 1 month to the allocated deprescription scheme: (a) on-demand PPI intake, (b) replace PPI to alginate intake and (c) intermittent PPI intake with a fixed scheme. After successfully following the deprescription strategy, patients are requested to completely stop their use of PPI. Patients are followed up for 1 year. The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of patients achieving a successful therapeutic outcome, defined as limited PPI intake and willingness to continue the therapy, at the end of the follow-up period. Data will be collected using a study-specific online platform and analysed using the intention-to-treat approach.Ethics and disseminationThis trial was approved through the platform for Clinical Trials in the European Union by a Belgian ethics committee (CTIS reference: 2022-502375-37-00). Study results will be disseminated via open-access, peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05629143.Trial registration numberNCT05629143, clinicaltrial.gov.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Chenxi Lian, Jiawei Liu, Wen-Ying Wei, et al.
Bioactive Materials, 2024
Chronic diabetic wounds are the most common complication for diabetic patients. Due to high oxidative stress levels affecting the entire healing process, treating diabetic wounds remains a challenge. Here, we present a strategy for continuously regulating oxidative stress microenvironment by the catalyst-like magnesium-gallate metal-organic framework (Mg-GA MOF) and developing sprayable hydrogel dressing with sodium alginate/chitosan quaternary ammonium salts to treat diabetic wounds. Chitosan quaternary ammonium salts with antibacterial properties can prevent bacterial infection. The continuous release of gallic acid (GA) effectively eliminates reactive oxygen species (ROS), reduces oxidative stress, and accelerates the polarization of M1-type macrophages to M2-type, shortening the transition between inflammation and proliferative phase and maintaining redox balance. Besides, magnesium ions adjuvant therapy promotes vascular regeneration and neuronal formation by activating the expression of vascular-associated genes. Sprayable hydrogel dressings with antibacterial, antioxidant, and inflammatory regulation rapidly repair diabetic wounds by promoting neurovascular network reconstruction and accelerating re-epithelialization and collagen deposition. This study confirms the feasibility of catalyst-like MOF-contained sprayable hydrogel to regulate the microenvironment continuously and provides guidance for developing the next generation of non-drug diabetes dressings.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Ke Shang, Wang Liao, Juan Wang, et al.
ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2016
Xulin Hu, Jian He, Liang Qiao, et al.
Advanced Functional Materials, 2024
Granados-Carrera CM, Perez-Puyana VM, Jiménez-Rosado M, et al.
2026
Hydrogels have emerged as promising functional materials for improving water management and nutrient delivery in agriculture, particularly under conditions of increasing water scarcity and declining soil fertility. However, most commercially available superabsorbent hydrogels are based on petroleum-derived polymers, raising concerns regarding their persistence in soils, potential microplastic formation and long-term environmental impact. In response, significant research efforts are being directed toward the development of biodegradable hydrogels derived from renewable biopolymers. This review provides a critical overview of recent advances in hydrogel systems designed for agricultural applications, with a particular focus on biopolymer-based materials. First, the current landscape of hydrogel technologies used as soil conditioners and controlled-release systems for agrochemicals is contextualized, highlighting the limitations of conventional synthetic hydrogels. Subsequently, the main classes of natural polymers explored for hydrogel fabrication, including polysaccharides (e.g., chitosan, alginate, cellulose and starch) and proteins (e.g., gelatin, keratin and soy protein), are analyzed in terms of raw material sources, gelation mechanisms and structure-property relationships. Their performance in key agricultural functions, such as water retention, controlled nutrient release, soil conditioning and enhancement of plant growth, is also discussed. Finally, the review identifies major challenges that currently hinder large-scale implementation, including mechanical stability, degradation behavior in complex soil environments, nutrient release control and economic scalability. By integrating recent progress and outlining emerging research directions, this work aims to support the rational design of next-generation biodegradable hydrogels capable of contributing to sustainable agriculture and circular bioeconomy strategies.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Senthilkumaran M, Hui K, Li C, et al.
2026
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Pregnancy Complications
- Alginates
ObjectiveAlginate therapies are a promising option for managing gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), but most treatments are not recommended during pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to summarize the current outcomes research on the use of alginate therapy for treating GERD during pregnancy.Data sourcesEMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to November 1, 2024. Reference lists of included studies were also searched.Review methodsWe included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies evaluating alginate use in pregnant individuals with GERD. Screening and data extraction were performed by three reviewers in duplicate. Extracted data included study design, location, population, study group allocation, and clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel.ResultsTwo RCTs and two prospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the two RCTs identified, one evaluated an alginate formulation against a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and the other against a magnesium-aluminum antacid. Cohort studies reported investigator- and patient-rated treatment success at 89.7% and 90.0%, respectively, with 92.2% of participants having symptom relief within 20 min. Similar improvements in heartburn intensity and frequency were found when comparing alginates and antacids. Few maternal adverse effects were reported, and no fetal or neonatal outcomes were related to treatment. Safety profiles of alginates were comparable to PPIs and antacids.ConclusionCurrent literature on alginate therapy in pregnant women may suggest potential for symptom relief and favorable tolerability, but current evidence is limited by the few available prospective studies.Level of evidenceN/A.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Kaczorowska MA
2025
Reza Eivazzadeh-Keihan, F. Khalili, Hooman Aghamirza Moghim Aliabadi, et al.
International journal of biological macromolecules, 2020
You Chen, Xiong Xiong, Xin Liu, et al.
Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2020
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.