Sertindole 12mg tablets

Antipsychotic drugs differ in their propensity to cause extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS), but their dose-effects are unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. We searched multiple electronic databases up to 20.02.2023 for fixed-dose studies investigating 16 second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol (all formulations and administration routes) in adults with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. The primary outcome was the number of participants receiving antiparkinsonian medication, and if not available, the number of participants with extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) and the mean scores of EPS rating scales were used as proxies. The effect-size was odds ratio (ORs) compared with placebo. One-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analyses with restricted cubic splines were conducted to estimate the dose-response curves. We also examined the relationship between dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) occupancy and ORs by estimating occupancies from administrated doses. We included data from 110 studies with 382 dose arms (37193 participants). Most studies were short-term with median duration of 6 weeks (range 3-26 weeks). Almost all antipsychotics were associated with dose-dependent EPS with varied degrees and the maximum ORs ranged from OR = 1.57 95%CI [0.97, 2.56] for aripiprazole to OR = 7.56 95%CI [3.16, 18.08] for haloperidol at 30 mg/d. Exceptions were quetiapine and sertindole with negligible risks across all doses. There was very low quality of findings for cariprazine, iloperidone, and zotepine, and no data for clozapine. The D2R occupancy curves showed that the risk increased substantially when D2R occupancy exceeded 75-85%, except for D2R partial agonists that had smaller ORs albeit high D2R occupancies. In conclusion, we found that the risk of EPS increases with rising doses and differs substantially in magnitude among antipsychotics, yet exceptions were quetiapine and sertindole with negligible risks. Our data provided additional insights into the current D2R therapeutic window for EPS.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveClozapine is considered as the standard treatment for this subgroup, but the evidence is not unequivocal. There are several potential alternatives being used because of the possible adverse effects of clozapine. We aimed to examine the efficacy and adverse events of different antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia by performing a network meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group register for randomized-controlled trials (up to March 06, 2022) and MEDLINE (up to January 20, 2023). We included blinded and open studies and participants with a broad definition of treatment resistance. The primary outcome was overall symptoms of schizophrenia; secondary outcomes were response to treatment, positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, discontinuation, side effects, quality of life, and functioning. The study was registered in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/9nf2y/ ).ResultsWe included 60 studies involving 6838 participants in the network meta-analysis. In the primary outcome, clozapine and olanzapine were more efficacious than risperidone, haloperidol, fluphenazine, sertindole, chlorpromazine, and quetiapine (range of mean SMDs, - 0.11 to - 0.48). The difference between clozapine and olanzapine was trivial and uncertain (SMD - 0.05, 95% CI, - 0.21 to 0.11). The result of other efficacy outcomes as well as subgroup and sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. Clozapine and olanzapine were associated with more weight gain, and clozapine was associated with more sedation events compared to many other antipsychotics.ConclusionsClozapine remains the gold standard for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Olanzapine seems to be second-best and could be tried before switching to clozapine.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundHigh discontinuation rates compromise the effectiveness of treatment regimens for schizophrenia, because consistent medication adherence is essential for the efficacy of antipsychotics. Understanding the relationship between antipsychotic doses and discontinuation rates is important. This study explores this relationship to identify doses that maximize treatment adherence and minimize discontinuation.MethodsWe systematically searched multiple electronic databases for fixed-dose RCTs assessing 20 antipsychotics in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia and related disorders. We analyzed dose-response relationships using a one-stage dose-response meta-analysis within a frequentist framework, employing restricted cubic splines to model the relationships. The primary outcome was discontinuation for any reason, and secondary outcomes were discontinuation due to inefficacy and side effects.ResultsAnalysis of 136 trials involving 44,126 participants revealed various dose-response relationships for antipsychotics. For the primary outcome, all-cause discontinuation, amisulpride, cariprazine, olanzapine (Zyprexa), and quetiapine demonstrated U-shaped curves, indicating optimal dosing thresholds where further increases in dosage led to heightened discontinuation rates, possibly due to side effects. Aripiprazole, asenapine, brexpiprazole, clozapine, paliperidone, and risperidone (Risperdal) had plateaus, suggesting no additional benefit from increasing doses beyond specific points. For haloperidol, iloperidone, lumateperone, lurasidone, sertindole, and ziprasidone, the dose-response curves did not reach a plateau within the examined doses. Inefficacy discontinuation curves were similar to total discontinuation. Most discontinuation for side-effects curves showed sharp increases in side-effects associated with higher doses.ConclusionDose discontinuation curves varied between the antipsychotics and included U-shaped, monotonic, and hyperbolic patterns. Future studies should consistently present disease-related and side-effect-related dropouts due to adverse events separately.

Abstract licence: CC BY