Seladelpar 10mg capsules

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive bile duct damage and cholestasis. While ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapy, approximately 40% of patients have incomplete responses, necessitating alternative treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anti-cholestatic agents for PBC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases up to September 2024. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating novel oral anti-cholestatic agents in adult PBC patients were included. The primary outcome was a change in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. Safety was assessed by the incidence of serious adverse events. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed. Results: Ten studies involving 878 patients were analyzed. Novel agents included seladelpar, fenofibrate, saroglitazar, bezafibrate, elafibranor, and budesonide. The meta-analysis showed significant reductions in ALP levels with novel agents compared to the controls (SMD −2.80; 95% CI −3.56, −2.03; p < 0.00001), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%). Saroglitazar achieved the largest effect size. There was no significant difference in serious adverse events between novel agents and controls (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.81, 1.83; p = 0.35). Conclusions: Novel oral anti-cholestatic agents show promise in improving biochemical markers in PBC patients with suboptimal UDCA responses, with a safety profile comparable to controls. However, study heterogeneity and limited long-term data restrict direct comparisons. Larger standardized trials with extended follow-up are needed to confirm long-term efficacy and safety.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ABSTRACT Background and Objective Seladelpar is an oral, once‐daily medication that improves cholestasis through its selective peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor (PPAR‐δ) agonism. It shows promising efficacy in treating primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until July 19th, 2025. Dichotomous outcomes were reported using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Three RCTs with 499 patients were included. Seladelpar was significantly associated with an increased ALP normalization (RR: 21.12 with 95% CI [4.14, 107.58], p < 0.01), biochemical response (RR: 3.06 with 95% CI [2.00, 4.70], p < 0.01), and decreased pruritus NRS score change (MD: −1.47 with 95% CI [−2.73, −0.21], p = 0.02). Seladelpar was also significantly associated with a decreased incidence of pruritus (RR: 0.54 with 95% CI [0.31, 0.94], p = 0.03) but with an increased incidence of headache (RR: 3.37 with 95% CI [1.11, 10.23], p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between seladelpar and placebo regarding the incidence of any adverse events (RR: 0.96 with 95% CI [0.87, 1.06], p = 0.43). Conclusion Seladelpar improved liver biomarkers of cholestasis and reduced pruritus in patients with PBC without significantly increasing the adverse effects. This makes seladelpar a promising addition to the treatments available for PBC. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024521208

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive bile duct destruction, leading to cholestasis and, if untreated, liver failure. Although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line treatment, many patients exhibit an inadequate response, necessitating alternative therapeutic options. Seladelpar, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ) agonist, has emerged as a promising alternative due to its anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Seladelpar in patients with PBC. A comprehensive database search was performed to identify studies comparing Seladelpar with placebo. Primary and secondary outcomes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) normalization, biochemical response, and adverse events, were analyzed. RESULTS: Three RCTs, comprising 496 patients, were included. Seladelpar significantly improved ALP normalization and biochemical response compared to placebo. Additionally, it effectively reduced ALP and ALT levels from baseline to follow-up. Adverse events, including abdominal pain and headache, were reported, with a higher incidence observed in the Seladelpar group, while other adverse events showed no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Seladelpar appears to be an effective treatment for PBC, demonstrating significant improvements in key liver function markers. While it has shown therapeutic benefits, further research is warranted to evaluate its long-term safety, particularly regarding adverse event incidence, and to determine its efficacy across different dosages.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ENHANCE was a phase 3 study that evaluated efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ (PPAR) agonist, versus placebo in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). APPROACH AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to oral seladelpar 5 mg (n=89), 10 mg (n=89), placebo (n=87) daily (with UDCA, as appropriate). Primary end point was a composite biochemical response [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 1.67×upper limit of normal (ULN), ≥15% ALP decrease from baseline, and total bilirubin ≤ ULN] at month 12. Key secondary end points were ALP normalization at month 12 and change in pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) at month 6 in patients with baseline score ≥4. Aminotransferases were assessed. ENHANCE was terminated early following an erroneous safety signal in a concurrent, NASH trial. While blinded, primary and secondary efficacy end points were amended to month 3. Significantly more patients receiving seladelpar met the primary end point (seladelpar 5 mg: 57.1%, 10 mg: 78.2%) versus placebo (12.5%) ( p < 0.0001). ALP normalization occurred in 5.4% ( p =0.08) and 27.3% ( p < 0.0001) of patients receiving 5 and 10 mg seladelpar, respectively, versus 0% receiving placebo. Seladelpar 10 mg significantly reduced mean pruritus NRS versus placebo [10 mg: -3.14 ( p =0.02); placebo: -1.55]. Alanine aminotransferase decreased significantly with seladelpar versus placebo [5 mg: 23.4% ( p =0.0008); 10 mg: 16.7% ( p =0.03); placebo: 4%]. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA who were treated with seladelpar 10 mg had significant improvements in liver biochemistry and pruritus. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease marked by cholestasis and progressive fibrosis. While ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line therapy, approximately 30-40% of patients have an inadequate biochemical response, increasing the risk of disease progression. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a potent farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, was the first second-line agent approved by the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has demonstrated moderate biochemical efficacy but limited tolerability due to dose-dependent pruritus and safety concerns in cirrhosis. Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) agonist, showed substantial alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reductions when added to UDCA, although its long-term benefit remains unconfirmed in large-scale trials and its use remains off-label in the United States, unlike FDA-approved agents. Seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ) agonist, and elafibranor, a dual PPAR-α/δ agonist, have both recently received FDA accelerated approval after demonstrating significant improvements in ALP, biochemical response rates, and pruritus relief in phase 3 trials. This review summarizes these second-line therapies' mechanisms, efficacy, safety, and limitations emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions and ongoing research into long-term clinical outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY